You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2011/02/28 03:52:36 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50840] New: similar bugs to apachebug45464
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50840
Summary: similar bugs to apachebug45464
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.2.17
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: mod_dav
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: songlinhai0543@gmail.com
After reading bug report of apachebug45464
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45464). I think if apr_stat
is called with APR_FINFO_NORM as the third parameter on windows platform,
similar performance problem will happen. So I check the latest httpd code
carefully, and find several places where apr_stat is called with APR_FINFO_NORM
as the third parameter.
I list them below, should they be patched? and should they be patched in the
same way as apachebug45464.
===================================================================
./modules/dav/fs/repos.c:462: rv = apr_stat(&src_finfo, src, APR_FINFO_NORM,
p);
====================================================================
./modules/dav/fs/repos.c:483: rv = apr_stat(&dst_state_finfo, dst,
APR_FINFO_NORM, p);
====================================================================
./modules/dav/fs/repos.c:796: APR_FINFO_NORM, ctx->pool);
rv = apr_stat(&parent_ctx->finfo, parent_ctx->pathname,
APR_FINFO_NORM, ctx->pool);
=====================================================================
./os/unix/unixd.c:253: APR_FINFO_NORM, ptemp)) != APR_SUCCESS)
{
if ((apr_stat(&wrapper, SUEXEC_BIN,
APR_FINFO_NORM, ptemp)) != APR_SUCCESS) {
return;
====================================================================
./srclib/apr/test/sendfile.c:149: rv = apr_stat(&finfo, fname,
APR_FINFO_NORM, p);
====================================================================
./srclib/apr/test/testdup.c:52: rv = apr_stat(&finfo, FILEPATH
"testdup.file", APR_FINFO_NORM, p);
====================================================================
./srclib/apr/test/testdup.c:97: rv = apr_stat(&finfo, FILEPATH
"testdup.readwrite.file", APR_FINFO_NORM, p);
====================================================================
./srclib/apr/test/testfileinfo.c:136: rv = apr_stat(&finfo, FILENAME,
APR_FINFO_NORM, p);
====================================================================;
./srclib/apr/test/testfileinfo.c:166: rv = apr_stat(&stat_finfo, FILENAME,
APR_FINFO_NORM, p);
====================================================================
./srclib/apr/test/testlfs.c:136: apr_stat(&finfo, TESTFN,
APR_FINFO_NORM, p));
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50840] similar bugs to apachebug45464
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50840
Linhai Song <so...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Linhai Song <so...@gmail.com> 2011-03-03 14:02:26 EST ---
I made some mistakes on my report.
Don't bother to look at this bug report.
Sorry for that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org