You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@yetus.apache.org by Allen Wittenauer <aw...@effectivemachines.com.INVALID> on 2019/01/10 17:14:30 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
I’m pleased to announce the the first release candidate for Apache Yetus 0.9.0!
Artifacts are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/yetus/0.9.0-RC1/
As of this vote the relevant SHA512 hashes are:
CHANGELOG.md: SHA512 = D126A635 166EB57E 1C66AB74 54121086 72F32A0B D3290AF4
5220466B A9A6D7A4 279E77A7 4AB49B64 70BEA686 54A1A69E
9E506721 75E56393 B321B122 B3903574
RELEASENOTES.md: SHA512 = 6A65AE86 2B67BEDA 72E713FE C3FA325A 50D9496F 3C71E38F
F5EBD819 98F368A8 DD130935 0F49CDEB 7568B6D5 9AF4ABFE
D696F354 EC821810 796E8B4C 0DC16057
apache-yetus-0.9.0-bin.tar.gz: SHA512 = 57088E7B A608866E 3715E753 C02D8645
7B1B99B0 ECD67B68 4FEBECAF 5335FBC1
12E83CD2 09F2A2FE A3CD2577 02B2EAF2
AB1B5480 0418A8E7 0AAA1603 4BDC734C
apache-yetus-0.9.0-site.tar.gz: SHA512 = ADCEF565 DCFF297F 8B0388C1 CEB07231
5C6D63C9 E87D7BC2 1980AF62 9802CD77
48C95460 73CB56D9 BBFD0FC4 38C75165
2898DDF2 AE2305C8 9E2218ED E7D334BE
apache-yetus-0.9.0-src.tar.gz: SHA512 = 3569D2FD 8F6AA006 8E3E319B CB58F48A
1B6CA49A 11EF3DBB 7E8A2AF6 0615293F
640B4913 A04C7B79 2CBCC35A C5514ABC
FFB10473 E5654009 D430CD2C BCC0C50F
Source repository commit: 856b10cbe3798db2ae621d6bd3209a588782d8f7
Maven staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheyetus-1013
Our KEYS file is at: https://www.apache.org/dist/yetus/KEYS
All artifacts are signed with my key (E846DF38)
JIRA version: https://s.apache.org/yetus-0.9.0-jira
Please take a few minutes to verify the release[1] and vote on releasing it:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Yetus 0.9.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
The vote will be subject to Majority Approval[2] until minimally Friday, January 18, 2019 at 15:00:00 UTC [3].
[1]: https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
[2]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval
[3]: https://s.apache.org/yetus-0.9.0-rc1-close
[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Allen Wittenauer <aw...@effectivemachines.com.INVALID>.
Counting my own vote, with four binding +1’s and no other votes cast, the vote for 0.9.0-RC1 passes.
Thanks everyone for contributing and participating!
I’ll start the work on getting the release finished.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Akira Ajisaka <aa...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Filed YETUS-777 for minor bug.
Thanks,
Akira
2019年1月17日(木) 7:15 Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>:
>
> oh and I almost forgot YETUS-776
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:13 PM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > ran into two things that I don't think need to be blockers, filed as
> > YETUS-774 and YETUS-775.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:38 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:26 PM Allen Wittenauer
> > > <aw...@effectivemachines.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Excellent. Thanks for putting together this RC. So far I've just been
> > > > > reading RN and looking at the shape of the artifacts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given:
> > > > >
> > > > >> releasedocmaker and shelldocs are now available as Jython-built jars.
> > > > >
> > > > > why don't these show up in the staged maven repo?
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I noticed that too, but didn’t think it was enough to stop the release. They *do* show up in the local repo. The other new bit (yetus-maven-plugin) does. I suspect my pom skullduggery is the reason. Now that things are starting to approach stable, I’m hoping those better versed in maven can step in and tell me how badly I screwed it up with a patch. :)
> > >
> > > That woks for me. I'm a big fan of roll-forward for us here in Yetus.
> > > I'll include a jira when I vote.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>.
oh and I almost forgot YETUS-776
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:13 PM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> ran into two things that I don't think need to be blockers, filed as
> YETUS-774 and YETUS-775.
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:38 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:26 PM Allen Wittenauer
> > <aw...@effectivemachines.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Excellent. Thanks for putting together this RC. So far I've just been
> > > > reading RN and looking at the shape of the artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > Given:
> > > >
> > > >> releasedocmaker and shelldocs are now available as Jython-built jars.
> > > >
> > > > why don't these show up in the staged maven repo?
> > >
> > > Yeah, I noticed that too, but didn’t think it was enough to stop the release. They *do* show up in the local repo. The other new bit (yetus-maven-plugin) does. I suspect my pom skullduggery is the reason. Now that things are starting to approach stable, I’m hoping those better versed in maven can step in and tell me how badly I screwed it up with a patch. :)
> >
> > That woks for me. I'm a big fan of roll-forward for us here in Yetus.
> > I'll include a jira when I vote.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
ran into two things that I don't think need to be blockers, filed as
YETUS-774 and YETUS-775.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:38 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:26 PM Allen Wittenauer
> <aw...@effectivemachines.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Excellent. Thanks for putting together this RC. So far I've just been
> > > reading RN and looking at the shape of the artifacts.
> > >
> > > Given:
> > >
> > >> releasedocmaker and shelldocs are now available as Jython-built jars.
> > >
> > > why don't these show up in the staged maven repo?
> >
> > Yeah, I noticed that too, but didn’t think it was enough to stop the release. They *do* show up in the local repo. The other new bit (yetus-maven-plugin) does. I suspect my pom skullduggery is the reason. Now that things are starting to approach stable, I’m hoping those better versed in maven can step in and tell me how badly I screwed it up with a patch. :)
>
> That woks for me. I'm a big fan of roll-forward for us here in Yetus.
> I'll include a jira when I vote.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Kengo Seki <se...@apache.org>.
Thanks a lot for driving the release again, Allen!
+1 (binding)
All checks described in
http://yetus.apache.org/contribute/releases/#verification passed.
I found a few minor issues which don't block this release (I think), so I
just filed them as YETUS-772 and YETUS-773.
Kengo Seki <sekikn@ <se...@gmail.com>apache.org>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:39 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:26 PM Allen Wittenauer
> <aw...@effectivemachines.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Excellent. Thanks for putting together this RC. So far I've just been
> > > reading RN and looking at the shape of the artifacts.
> > >
> > > Given:
> > >
> > >> releasedocmaker and shelldocs are now available as Jython-built jars.
> > >
> > > why don't these show up in the staged maven repo?
> >
> > Yeah, I noticed that too, but didn’t think it was enough to stop the
release. They *do* show up in the local repo. The other new bit
(yetus-maven-plugin) does. I suspect my pom skullduggery is the reason.
Now that things are starting to approach stable, I’m hoping those better
versed in maven can step in and tell me how badly I screwed it up with a
patch. :)
>
> That woks for me. I'm a big fan of roll-forward for us here in Yetus.
> I'll include a jira when I vote.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:26 PM Allen Wittenauer
<aw...@effectivemachines.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Excellent. Thanks for putting together this RC. So far I've just been
> > reading RN and looking at the shape of the artifacts.
> >
> > Given:
> >
> >> releasedocmaker and shelldocs are now available as Jython-built jars.
> >
> > why don't these show up in the staged maven repo?
>
> Yeah, I noticed that too, but didn’t think it was enough to stop the release. They *do* show up in the local repo. The other new bit (yetus-maven-plugin) does. I suspect my pom skullduggery is the reason. Now that things are starting to approach stable, I’m hoping those better versed in maven can step in and tell me how badly I screwed it up with a patch. :)
That woks for me. I'm a big fan of roll-forward for us here in Yetus.
I'll include a jira when I vote.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Allen Wittenauer <aw...@effectivemachines.com.INVALID>.
> On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Excellent. Thanks for putting together this RC. So far I've just been
> reading RN and looking at the shape of the artifacts.
>
> Given:
>
>> releasedocmaker and shelldocs are now available as Jython-built jars.
>
> why don't these show up in the staged maven repo?
Yeah, I noticed that too, but didn’t think it was enough to stop the release. They *do* show up in the local repo. The other new bit (yetus-maven-plugin) does. I suspect my pom skullduggery is the reason. Now that things are starting to approach stable, I’m hoping those better versed in maven can step in and tell me how badly I screwed it up with a patch. :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.9.0-RC1
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>.
Excellent. Thanks for putting together this RC. So far I've just been
reading RN and looking at the shape of the artifacts.
Given:
> releasedocmaker and shelldocs are now available as Jython-built jars.
why don't these show up in the staged maven repo?
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:14 AM Allen Wittenauer
<aw...@effectivemachines.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> I’m pleased to announce the the first release candidate for Apache Yetus 0.9.0!
>
> Artifacts are available here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/yetus/0.9.0-RC1/
>
> As of this vote the relevant SHA512 hashes are:
>
> CHANGELOG.md: SHA512 = D126A635 166EB57E 1C66AB74 54121086 72F32A0B D3290AF4
> 5220466B A9A6D7A4 279E77A7 4AB49B64 70BEA686 54A1A69E
> 9E506721 75E56393 B321B122 B3903574
>
> RELEASENOTES.md: SHA512 = 6A65AE86 2B67BEDA 72E713FE C3FA325A 50D9496F 3C71E38F
> F5EBD819 98F368A8 DD130935 0F49CDEB 7568B6D5 9AF4ABFE
> D696F354 EC821810 796E8B4C 0DC16057
>
> apache-yetus-0.9.0-bin.tar.gz: SHA512 = 57088E7B A608866E 3715E753 C02D8645
> 7B1B99B0 ECD67B68 4FEBECAF 5335FBC1
> 12E83CD2 09F2A2FE A3CD2577 02B2EAF2
> AB1B5480 0418A8E7 0AAA1603 4BDC734C
>
> apache-yetus-0.9.0-site.tar.gz: SHA512 = ADCEF565 DCFF297F 8B0388C1 CEB07231
> 5C6D63C9 E87D7BC2 1980AF62 9802CD77
> 48C95460 73CB56D9 BBFD0FC4 38C75165
> 2898DDF2 AE2305C8 9E2218ED E7D334BE
>
> apache-yetus-0.9.0-src.tar.gz: SHA512 = 3569D2FD 8F6AA006 8E3E319B CB58F48A
> 1B6CA49A 11EF3DBB 7E8A2AF6 0615293F
> 640B4913 A04C7B79 2CBCC35A C5514ABC
> FFB10473 E5654009 D430CD2C BCC0C50F
>
>
> Source repository commit: 856b10cbe3798db2ae621d6bd3209a588782d8f7
> Maven staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheyetus-1013
>
> Our KEYS file is at: https://www.apache.org/dist/yetus/KEYS
> All artifacts are signed with my key (E846DF38)
>
> JIRA version: https://s.apache.org/yetus-0.9.0-jira
>
> Please take a few minutes to verify the release[1] and vote on releasing it:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Yetus 0.9.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> The vote will be subject to Majority Approval[2] until minimally Friday, January 18, 2019 at 15:00:00 UTC [3].
>
> [1]: https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> [2]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval
> [3]: https://s.apache.org/yetus-0.9.0-rc1-close
>
>
>
>