You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chukwa.apache.org by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2012/11/20 16:28:56 UTC
[VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
All,
The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the Chukwa podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported to a new home on GitHub.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
[ ] 0 for Don't care
[ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
Regards,
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by Ahmed Fathalla <af...@gmail.com>.
0
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the Chukwa
> podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported to a new
> home on GitHub.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
> [ ] 0 for Don't care
> [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
--
Ahmed Fathalla
Re: [VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by Bernd Fondermann <be...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> [X ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
Sorry, but there's been no evidence that this project is progressing
over the last three years.
I was hesitant to cast this vote, but reviewing activity makes it
pretty obvious.
Bernd
Re: [VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by Alan Cabrera <ad...@toolazydogs.com>.
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> All,
>
> The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the Chukwa podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported to a new home on GitHub.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
> [ ] 0 for Don't care
> [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Renamed subject.
I think you bring up a valid concern. To be sure, the infrastructure and administrative costs are negligible. So, we don't need to worry on that account. However, the ASF Incubator is not a place where you can hang your shingle up and hope that someday someone will wander by and be interested.
The Incubator is merely a vetting mechanism to make sure that a community has a minimal set of ducks in a row as well as proven that it is a vibrant community.
Here at Chukwa we've had not many commits beyond patches, no dev talk, and no releases. That's the problem.
A +1 is not a judgement on the technology or its developers. It is a simple recognition that Chukwa, for what ever reason, has been unable to generate an active community.
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 20, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Ariel Rabkin wrote:
> My vote is 0 -- abstain. I would be happy to leave the project in
> incubation longer in case something turns up, but I'm not paying the
> administrative costs, so I don't feel able to vote -1.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the Chukwa podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported to a new home on GitHub.
>>
>> Please cast your vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
>> [ ] 0 for Don't care
>> [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
> Princeton Computer Science Department
Re: [VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by 唐 颖 <iv...@gmail.com>.
0
在 2012-11-22，上午4:03，Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> 写道：
> -1
>
> Chukwa has several good design discussions and new features being committed
> in the past 6 month. e.g. New feature to add compression feature between
> agent and collector. Proposal for adding ability to support Ganglia Web as
> frontend. Validation and verification of JSP compilation. One of the long
> outstanding demux partition algorithm also has been refined. There are
> proposal being made and discussed. I think it is important that mentor
> recognize those contributions.
>
> There is no paid developer in developing Chukwa. Therefore, the activities
> may be less than some of the paid developers working on project that get
> shipped as a commercial product. However, I think this community should
> not be judged by a single metric of how many patches were open/closed in
> the past 30 days. I like to continue to contribute to Chukwa at project's
> own pace. I am committed to long term support to this project.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Bill Graham <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 0
>>
>> Basically the same sentiment as Ari.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My vote is 0 -- abstain. I would be happy to leave the project in
>>> incubation longer in case something turns up, but I'm not paying the
>>> administrative costs, so I don't feel able to vote -1.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the
>>> Chukwa podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported
>>> to a new home on GitHub.
>>>>
>>>> Please cast your vote:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
>>>> [ ] 0 for Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
>>> Princeton Computer Science Department
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at
>> billgraham@gmail.com going forward.*
>>
Re: [VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com>.
-1
Chukwa has several good design discussions and new features being committed
in the past 6 month. e.g. New feature to add compression feature between
agent and collector. Proposal for adding ability to support Ganglia Web as
frontend. Validation and verification of JSP compilation. One of the long
outstanding demux partition algorithm also has been refined. There are
proposal being made and discussed. I think it is important that mentor
recognize those contributions.
There is no paid developer in developing Chukwa. Therefore, the activities
may be less than some of the paid developers working on project that get
shipped as a commercial product. However, I think this community should
not be judged by a single metric of how many patches were open/closed in
the past 30 days. I like to continue to contribute to Chukwa at project's
own pace. I am committed to long term support to this project.
regards,
Eric
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Bill Graham <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 0
>
> Basically the same sentiment as Ari.
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My vote is 0 -- abstain. I would be happy to leave the project in
> > incubation longer in case something turns up, but I'm not paying the
> > administrative costs, so I don't feel able to vote -1.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> > wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the
> > Chukwa podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported
> > to a new home on GitHub.
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
> > > [ ] 0 for Don't care
> > > [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
> > Princeton Computer Science Department
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at
> billgraham@gmail.com going forward.*
>
Re: [VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by Bill Graham <bi...@gmail.com>.
0
Basically the same sentiment as Ari.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My vote is 0 -- abstain. I would be happy to leave the project in
> incubation longer in case something turns up, but I'm not paying the
> administrative costs, so I don't feel able to vote -1.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the
> Chukwa podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported
> to a new home on GitHub.
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
> > [ ] 0 for Don't care
> > [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
> Princeton Computer Science Department
>
--
*Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at
billgraham@gmail.com going forward.*
Re: [VOTE] Retire the Chukwa podling
Posted by Ariel Rabkin <as...@gmail.com>.
My vote is 0 -- abstain. I would be happy to leave the project in
incubation longer in case something turns up, but I'm not paying the
administrative costs, so I don't feel able to vote -1.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> The current thinking among the PPMC is that it's time to retire the Chukwa podling. Eric is working on getting the Subversion history ported to a new home on GitHub.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 to retire the Chukwa project
> [ ] 0 for Don't care
> [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
--
Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
Princeton Computer Science Department