You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Brad Nicholes <bn...@novell.com> on 2008/01/18 22:59:37 UTC

[Fwd: Re: [Patch]: Add a couple of cases to the apr_ldap_set_option function.]

Committed.


>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at  9:40 AM, in message <47...@remulak.net>,
"Paul J. Reder" <re...@remulak.net> wrote: 

> Any takers?
> 
> I'm still hoping to get this reviewed by someone and have it committed to
> APR (since I don't have karma for that) so I can commit the Apache portion
> to trunk.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul J. Reder
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Patch]: Add a couple of cases to the apr_ldap_set_option 
> function.]
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:41:10 -0500
> From: Paul J. Reder <re...@remulak.net>
> To: APR dev list. <de...@apr.apache.org>
> 
> Just in case it would help in evaluating these APR changes this is the
> link to the Apache-trunk code, which uses these APR changes, that I'm
> waiting to commit...
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~rederpj/Apache-trunk_rebind.diff
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul J. Reder
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Patch]: Add a couple of cases to the apr_ldap_set_option 
> function.
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:57:17 -0500
> From: Paul J. Reder <re...@remulak.net>
> To: APR dev list. <de...@apr.apache.org>
> References: <47...@remulak.net>
> 
> Brad confirmed that this should work for Novell. My pass through the
> limited Solaris docs I was able find seemed to indicate this should work.
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~rederpj/apr-util-ldap.diff
> 
> Any more reviews? Anyone to commit it?
> 
> I was hoping to get this committed so I could commit the Apache trunk
> code that uses this before I go on vacation next week.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Paul J. Reder wrote:
>> In keeping with the APR concept of hiding LDAP differences, I added a 
>> couple
>> of cases to the apr_ldap_set_option function. One of the cases has 
>> differences
>> between at least the openLDAP and Tivoli SDKs so I added both of them for
>> consistency and to handle possible differences in other SDKs.
>> 
>> Folks who know the other SDKs should check if any #ifs need to be added
>> to these cases for any of the other SDKs.
>> 
>> Once someone commits this patch I will be able to commit the Apache portion
>> of the rebind code.