You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tajo.apache.org by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> on 2017/12/02 17:42:39 UTC
Re: [DISCUSSION] 0.12 release
Thank you guys.
I just rescheduled 'OPEN' issues scheduled for 0.12.0 to 0.13.0. If we need
them for 0.12 or next minor release, we can feel free to reschedule them.
I'm going to review in-progress issues for 0.12.0 too. If they are not
critical, I'll reschedule them to next release. If you have any idea,
please feel free to give us feedback.
Best regards,
Hyunsik Choi
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:57 AM Jong-young Park <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that.
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 PM 김 진호 <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your efforts
> >
> > - Jinho
> >
> > > On 27 Nov 2017, at 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I'm going to move forward 0.12 release. I just looked into our progress
> > > about 0.12 in Jira. 239 issues are already resolved in 0.12, 11 are in
> > > progress, 58 are scheduled yet are not started. As we discussed early,
> we
> > > can reschedule not critical issues to next release.
> > >
> > > To prepare 0.12 release, I've just created 'branch-0.12.0' from the
> > current
> > > master.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Hyunsik Choi
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:22 PM Hyunsik Choi <hy...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you guys were doing issues scheduled to 0.12, please change fix
> > >> versions.
> > >>
> > >> Dongjin,
> > >> Sure. You can freely change the schedule.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Hyunsik
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:21 AM Dongjin Lee <dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was
> > originally
> > >>> aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you
> change
> > >>> their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone who
> > is
> > >>> working on those issues, I would like to take them.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Dongjin
> > >>>
> > >>> [^1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1724
> > >>> [^2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1951
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee <
> > dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1. No Problems.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Dongjin
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1, I agree with you.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Jihoon
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2016년 9월 13일 (화) 오후 2:02, Jinho Kim <jh...@apache.org>님이 작성:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Hyunsik,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> We don’t have blocker issue. So I agree with 0.12 release
> > >>>>>> It’s very useful to users, I think.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Jinho
> > >>>>>> Best regards
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2016-09-12 18:14 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi guys,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 0.12 release is being delayed because we haven't finish some
> issues
> > >>>>>>> scheduled to 0.12. There are many demands on 0.12 release. The
> main
> > >>>>>> reason
> > >>>>>>> is much different code base between master and 0.11.x. Some users
> > >>> and
> > >>>>>>> developers want to fix bugs in 0.11.x as well as in master
> branch.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think it's time to release 0.12 release with the current branch
> > >>> and
> > >>>>>> some
> > >>>>>>> critical remain issues.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> My question is two:
> > >>>>>>> * What do you think about it?
> > >>>>>>> * If we agree with 0.12. release, what issues must be included in
> > >>>>> this
> > >>>>>>> release?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your opinions.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>> Hyunsik
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> *Dongjin Lee*
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
> > >>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
> > >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
> > >>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> > >>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
> > >>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
> > >>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
> > >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> *Dongjin Lee*
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
> > >>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
> > >>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
> > >>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> > >>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
> > >>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
> > >>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
> > >>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] 0.12 release
Posted by 김 진호 <ji...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a lot for your work.
-Jinho
2019. 6. 16. 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> 작성:
> Hi,
>
> As we discussed before, the current branch 0.12.0 is already ready to be
> released. So, I'd like to move forward with the 0.12.0 release. I'll open a
> vote for release soon.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik Choi
>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:40 PM Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I rescheduled in-progress issues which are scheduled at 0.12.0 are not
>> criticial into 0.13.0. Currently, only TAJO-1925 remains in 0.12.0.
>>
>> @Jaehwa,
>> Could you check the last comment in TAJO-1925?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hyunsik Choi
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:42 AM Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you guys.
>>>
>>> I just rescheduled 'OPEN' issues scheduled for 0.12.0 to 0.13.0. If we
>>> need them for 0.12 or next minor release, we can feel free to reschedule
>>> them.
>>>
>>> I'm going to review in-progress issues for 0.12.0 too. If they are not
>>> critical, I'll reschedule them to next release. If you have any idea,
>>> please feel free to give us feedback.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Hyunsik Choi
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:57 AM Jong-young Park <em...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm glad to hear that.
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 PM 김 진호 <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your efforts
>>>>>
>>>>> - Jinho
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Nov 2017, at 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm going to move forward 0.12 release. I just looked into our
>>>> progress
>>>>>> about 0.12 in Jira. 239 issues are already resolved in 0.12, 11 are
>>>> in
>>>>>> progress, 58 are scheduled yet are not started. As we discussed
>>>> early, we
>>>>>> can reschedule not critical issues to next release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To prepare 0.12 release, I've just created 'branch-0.12.0' from the
>>>>> current
>>>>>> master.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Hyunsik Choi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:22 PM Hyunsik Choi <
>>>> hyunsik.choi@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you guys were doing issues scheduled to 0.12, please change fix
>>>>>>> versions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dongjin,
>>>>>>> Sure. You can freely change the schedule.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:21 AM Dongjin Lee <
>>>> dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was
>>>>> originally
>>>>>>>> aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you
>>>> change
>>>>>>>> their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone
>>>> who
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> working on those issues, I would like to take them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Dongjin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [^1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1724
>>>>>>>> [^2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1951
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee <
>>>>> dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1. No Problems.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Dongjin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1, I agree with you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Jihoon
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2016년 9월 13일 (화) 오후 2:02, Jinho Kim <jh...@apache.org>님이 작성:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hyunsik,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We don’t have blocker issue. So I agree with 0.12 release
>>>>>>>>>>> It’s very useful to users, I think.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Jinho
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-12 18:14 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.12 release is being delayed because we haven't finish some
>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> scheduled to 0.12. There are many demands on 0.12 release. The
>>>> main
>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>>>> is much different code base between master and 0.11.x. Some
>>>> users
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> developers want to fix bugs in 0.11.x as well as in master
>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's time to release 0.12 release with the current
>>>> branch
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>> critical remain issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My question is two:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * What do you think about it?
>>>>>>>>>>>> * If we agree with 0.12. release, what issues must be included
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your opinions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hyunsik
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Dongjin Lee*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale
>>>> machine
>>>>>>>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
>>>>>>>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>>>>>>>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
>>>>>>>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
>>>>>>>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
>>>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> *Dongjin Lee*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
>>>>>>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
>>>>>>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>>>>>>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
>>>>>>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
>>>>>>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
>>>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
>>>>>>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSSION] 0.12 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
Hi,
As we discussed before, the current branch 0.12.0 is already ready to be
released. So, I'd like to move forward with the 0.12.0 release. I'll open a
vote for release soon.
Best regards,
Hyunsik Choi
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:40 PM Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> I rescheduled in-progress issues which are scheduled at 0.12.0 are not
> criticial into 0.13.0. Currently, only TAJO-1925 remains in 0.12.0.
>
> @Jaehwa,
> Could you check the last comment in TAJO-1925?
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik Choi
>
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:42 AM Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thank you guys.
>>
>> I just rescheduled 'OPEN' issues scheduled for 0.12.0 to 0.13.0. If we
>> need them for 0.12 or next minor release, we can feel free to reschedule
>> them.
>>
>> I'm going to review in-progress issues for 0.12.0 too. If they are not
>> critical, I'll reschedule them to next release. If you have any idea,
>> please feel free to give us feedback.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Hyunsik Choi
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:57 AM Jong-young Park <em...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm glad to hear that.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 PM 김 진호 <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thank you for your efforts
>>> >
>>> > - Jinho
>>> >
>>> > > On 27 Nov 2017, at 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi guys,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm going to move forward 0.12 release. I just looked into our
>>> progress
>>> > > about 0.12 in Jira. 239 issues are already resolved in 0.12, 11 are
>>> in
>>> > > progress, 58 are scheduled yet are not started. As we discussed
>>> early, we
>>> > > can reschedule not critical issues to next release.
>>> > >
>>> > > To prepare 0.12 release, I've just created 'branch-0.12.0' from the
>>> > current
>>> > > master.
>>> > >
>>> > > Best regards,
>>> > > Hyunsik Choi
>>> > >
>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:22 PM Hyunsik Choi <
>>> hyunsik.choi@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> If you guys were doing issues scheduled to 0.12, please change fix
>>> > >> versions.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Dongjin,
>>> > >> Sure. You can freely change the schedule.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Best regards,
>>> > >> Hyunsik
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:21 AM Dongjin Lee <
>>> dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was
>>> > originally
>>> > >>> aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you
>>> change
>>> > >>> their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone
>>> who
>>> > is
>>> > >>> working on those issues, I would like to take them.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Regards,
>>> > >>> Dongjin
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> [^1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1724
>>> > >>> [^2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1951
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee <
>>> > dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> +1. No Problems.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Regards,
>>> > >>>> Dongjin
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jihoon Son <jihoonson@apache.org
>>> >
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>> +1, I agree with you.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Best,
>>> > >>>>> Jihoon
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> 2016년 9월 13일 (화) 오후 2:02, Jinho Kim <jh...@apache.org>님이 작성:
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> Hi Hyunsik,
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> We don’t have blocker issue. So I agree with 0.12 release
>>> > >>>>>> It’s very useful to users, I think.
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> -Jinho
>>> > >>>>>> Best regards
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> 2016-09-12 18:14 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>:
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> 0.12 release is being delayed because we haven't finish some
>>> issues
>>> > >>>>>>> scheduled to 0.12. There are many demands on 0.12 release. The
>>> main
>>> > >>>>>> reason
>>> > >>>>>>> is much different code base between master and 0.11.x. Some
>>> users
>>> > >>> and
>>> > >>>>>>> developers want to fix bugs in 0.11.x as well as in master
>>> branch.
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> I think it's time to release 0.12 release with the current
>>> branch
>>> > >>> and
>>> > >>>>>> some
>>> > >>>>>>> critical remain issues.
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> My question is two:
>>> > >>>>>>> * What do you think about it?
>>> > >>>>>>> * If we agree with 0.12. release, what issues must be included
>>> in
>>> > >>>>> this
>>> > >>>>>>> release?
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your opinions.
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Best regards,
>>> > >>>>>>> Hyunsik
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> --
>>> > >>>> *Dongjin Lee*
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale
>>> machine
>>> > >>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
>>> > >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
>>> > >>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>>> > >>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
>>> > >>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
>>> > >>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
>>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
>>> > >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> --
>>> > >>> *Dongjin Lee*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
>>> > >>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
>>> > >>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
>>> > >>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>>> > >>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
>>> > >>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
>>> > >>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
>>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
>>> > >>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSSION] 0.12 release
Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
I rescheduled in-progress issues which are scheduled at 0.12.0 are not
criticial into 0.13.0. Currently, only TAJO-1925 remains in 0.12.0.
@Jaehwa,
Could you check the last comment in TAJO-1925?
Best regards,
Hyunsik Choi
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:42 AM Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thank you guys.
>
> I just rescheduled 'OPEN' issues scheduled for 0.12.0 to 0.13.0. If we
> need them for 0.12 or next minor release, we can feel free to reschedule
> them.
>
> I'm going to review in-progress issues for 0.12.0 too. If they are not
> critical, I'll reschedule them to next release. If you have any idea,
> please feel free to give us feedback.
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik Choi
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:57 AM Jong-young Park <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm glad to hear that.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 PM 김 진호 <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thank you for your efforts
>> >
>> > - Jinho
>> >
>> > > On 27 Nov 2017, at 09:47, Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi guys,
>> > >
>> > > I'm going to move forward 0.12 release. I just looked into our
>> progress
>> > > about 0.12 in Jira. 239 issues are already resolved in 0.12, 11 are in
>> > > progress, 58 are scheduled yet are not started. As we discussed
>> early, we
>> > > can reschedule not critical issues to next release.
>> > >
>> > > To prepare 0.12 release, I've just created 'branch-0.12.0' from the
>> > current
>> > > master.
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Hyunsik Choi
>> > >
>> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:22 PM Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik.choi@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> If you guys were doing issues scheduled to 0.12, please change fix
>> > >> versions.
>> > >>
>> > >> Dongjin,
>> > >> Sure. You can freely change the schedule.
>> > >>
>> > >> Best regards,
>> > >> Hyunsik
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:21 AM Dongjin Lee <
>> dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was
>> > originally
>> > >>> aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you
>> change
>> > >>> their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone
>> who
>> > is
>> > >>> working on those issues, I would like to take them.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards,
>> > >>> Dongjin
>> > >>>
>> > >>> [^1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1724
>> > >>> [^2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1951
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee <
>> > dongjin.lee.kr@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> +1. No Problems.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Regards,
>> > >>>> Dongjin
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Jihoon Son <ji...@apache.org>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> +1, I agree with you.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Best,
>> > >>>>> Jihoon
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> 2016년 9월 13일 (화) 오후 2:02, Jinho Kim <jh...@apache.org>님이 작성:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Hi Hyunsik,
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> We don’t have blocker issue. So I agree with 0.12 release
>> > >>>>>> It’s very useful to users, I think.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> -Jinho
>> > >>>>>> Best regards
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> 2016-09-12 18:14 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Hi guys,
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> 0.12 release is being delayed because we haven't finish some
>> issues
>> > >>>>>>> scheduled to 0.12. There are many demands on 0.12 release. The
>> main
>> > >>>>>> reason
>> > >>>>>>> is much different code base between master and 0.11.x. Some
>> users
>> > >>> and
>> > >>>>>>> developers want to fix bugs in 0.11.x as well as in master
>> branch.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> I think it's time to release 0.12 release with the current
>> branch
>> > >>> and
>> > >>>>>> some
>> > >>>>>>> critical remain issues.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> My question is two:
>> > >>>>>>> * What do you think about it?
>> > >>>>>>> * If we agree with 0.12. release, what issues must be included
>> in
>> > >>>>> this
>> > >>>>>>> release?
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> I'm looking forward to your opinions.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Best regards,
>> > >>>>>>> Hyunsik
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> --
>> > >>>> *Dongjin Lee*
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
>> > >>>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
>> > >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
>> > >>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>> > >>>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
>> > >>>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
>> > >>>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
>> > >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> *Dongjin Lee*
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> *Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine
>> > >>> learning.facebook: www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr
>> > >>> <http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr>linkedin:
>> > >>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>> > >>> <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>github:
>> > >>> <http://goog_969573159>github.com/dongjinleekr
>> > >>> <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>twitter:
>> www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr
>> > >>> <http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr>*
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>