You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com> on 2005/01/31 22:18:38 UTC
Time for 2.0.53?
Any opposition to doing a tag and roll of 2.0.53 soon? (Yes, I volunteer
to be RM.) How about targetting next Tuesday (2/8) for 2.0.53? I can lay
down the candidate tarball on Friday morning, so whatever backports are
merged by then make it. =)
Do we want closure on Jeff's proxy chunking patch for 2.0.53? -- justin
Re: Time for 2.0.53?
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
I'd love to see the LDAP socket timeout configuration stuff make it in
for 2.0.53!
--
Jess Holle
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Any opposition to doing a tag and roll of 2.0.53 soon? (Yes, I
> volunteer to be RM.) How about targetting next Tuesday (2/8) for
> 2.0.53? I can lay down the candidate tarball on Friday morning, so
> whatever backports are merged by then make it. =)
>
> Do we want closure on Jeff's proxy chunking patch for 2.0.53? -- justin
>
Re: Time for 2.0.53?
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
--On Tuesday, February 1, 2005 6:41 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
<tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heck, I don't know how we get from here to closure on the 2.1-dev
> equivalent ;) What do we do with the proxy-reqbody branch? Merge to
> trunk?
Is it ready to be reviewed? I'd suggest asking for review to merge it
back. And, no, I haven't looked at the branch yet - I've been waiting for
you to say that it was ready to merge. =) -- justin
Re: Time for 2.0.53?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:18:38 -0800, Justin Erenkrantz
<ju...@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> Any opposition to doing a tag and roll of 2.0.53 soon? (Yes, I volunteer
> to be RM.) How about targetting next Tuesday (2/8) for 2.0.53? I can lay
> down the candidate tarball on Friday morning, so whatever backports are
> merged by then make it. =)
>
> Do we want closure on Jeff's proxy chunking patch for 2.0.53? -- justin
Heck, I don't know how we get from here to closure on the 2.1-dev
equivalent ;) What do we do with the proxy-reqbody branch? Merge to
trunk?
RE: Time for 2.0.53?
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:justin@erenkrantz.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:19 PM
> Any opposition to doing a tag and roll of 2.0.53 soon?
Nope.
> (Yes, I volunteer to be RM.)
Thanks Justin.
> How about targetting next Tuesday (2/8) for 2.0.53? I can lay
> down the candidate tarball on Friday morning, so whatever
> backports are merged by then make it. =)
I wouldn't pin yourself to a release date too much. Just start
the T&R and when we're satisfied with it, release.
> Do we want closure on Jeff's proxy chunking patch for 2.0.53?
It's not a showstopper IMO.
> -- justin
Sander