You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Eddie Bush <ek...@swbell.net> on 2002/07/25 03:05:10 UTC
Tiles Obfuscation
Hi. I have an observation and a suggestion. I'm sure it wasn't
intentional, but the name of the DefinitionDispatcherAction for
forwarding to definitions is kind of confusing to me. I like to have
never found it because of it's name. Is it possible it could be renamed
to DefinitionActionForward - or just DefinitionForward? Having
"Dispatcher" in it's name implies, to me at least, that this is an
action which will take a parameter and do something based on what that
parameter is - like the DispatchAction! Does it embody this behavior
too, and I just don't know it? I'd personally like to see
DefinitionDispatcherAction deprecated in favor of a more appropriately
named class that does the same exact thing.
Comments? Did I just waaaaaaaaaaaaaay totally miss something?
How's the self-generating beer endeavor going? James? Mark? ;-) LOL
Thanks!
Eddie
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Tiles Obfuscation
Posted by Eddie Bush <ek...@swbell.net>.
... wonder why the mailing list doesn't change it to struts-user though
... Oh weird - it did this time. Maybe it's my mailer (Mozilla)
screwing up on me. It wouldn't be the first time. I love it to death,
but sometimes it just flakes. I'm not sure whether I blame it on
Mozilla or KDE (my desktop environment) though. KDE kinda makes some
things spaz occassionally.
Anyway :-) Sorry! It was obviously an error on my end.
James Mitchell wrote:
>No, actually I do.
>
>I'm using my DSL provider's smtp server, but want people to reply to
>struts-atlanta.
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Tiles Obfuscation
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@telocity.com>.
No, actually I do.
I'm using my DSL provider's smtp server, but want people to reply to
struts-atlanta.
James "Sasquatch's long lost cousin" Mitchell
Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network"
http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@swbell.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:35 AM
> To: Struts Users List
> Subject: Re: Tiles Obfuscation
>
>
> LOL ... you gotta love this list ;-)
>
> Hey, James - you're somehow getting your reply-to set to
> struts-atlanta@open-tools.org. My guess is that you don't intend that
> to happen ...
>
> Regards,
>
> Eddie
>
> James Mitchell wrote:
>
> >>Maybe James would care to "evanglize" me :-) LOL ... since he's the
> >>resident Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist ;-)
> >>
> >
> ><placing-hand-on-your-forehead>...you are HEALED my son!!!
> >Now go forth into all the nations and spread the news that STRUTS IS HERE
> >BABY!!!!!
> >
> >>Thanks!
> >>
> >>Eddie
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Tiles Obfuscation
Posted by Eddie Bush <ek...@swbell.net>.
LOL ... you gotta love this list ;-)
Hey, James - you're somehow getting your reply-to set to
struts-atlanta@open-tools.org. My guess is that you don't intend that
to happen ...
Regards,
Eddie
James Mitchell wrote:
>>Maybe James would care to "evanglize" me :-) LOL ... since he's the
>>resident Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist ;-)
>>
>
><placing-hand-on-your-forehead>...you are HEALED my son!!!
>Now go forth into all the nations and spread the news that STRUTS IS HERE
>BABY!!!!!
>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>Eddie
>>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Tiles Obfuscation
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@telocity.com>.
>
> Maybe James would care to "evanglize" me :-) LOL ... since he's the
> resident Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist ;-)
>
<placing-hand-on-your-forehead>...you are HEALED my son!!!
Now go forth into all the nations and spread the news that STRUTS IS HERE
BABY!!!!!
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
James "The Original Sasquatch" Mitchell
Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network"
http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Tiles Obfuscation
Posted by Eddie Bush <ed...@vestus.adabbs.com>.
That's what NoOpAction is for, isn't it! <smack-forehead/> Ok ... I'm
used to a no-op being a no-op. I suppose it is a no-op, since it
doens't actually forward anywhere, but, rather, render the content right
there. Actually, in either case, there is an operation of some sort
being performed. Perhaps this is the DefinitionForward action I spoke
of earlier. I bet the "Dispatch" one does just that...
Perhaps someone could enlighten me :-) Show me where to RTFM perhaps?
Maybe James would care to "evanglize" me :-) LOL ... since he's the
resident Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist ;-)
Thanks!
Eddie
Eddie Bush wrote:
> Incidentally, if there is a better alternative for a "simple scenario"
> where you want to forward to a definition, I'd _love_ to hear about
> it. I'd like to take advantage of this feature.
>
> Thanks Again!
>
> Eddie
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Tiles Obfuscation
Posted by Eddie Bush <ek...@swbell.net>.
Incidentally, if there is a better alternative for a "simple scenario"
where you want to forward to a definition, I'd _love_ to hear about it.
I'd like to take advantage of this feature.
Thanks Again!
Eddie
Eddie Bush wrote:
> Hi. I have an observation and a suggestion. I'm sure it wasn't
> intentional, but the name of the DefinitionDispatcherAction for
> forwarding to definitions is kind of confusing to me. I like to have
> never found it because of it's name. Is it possible it could be
> renamed to DefinitionActionForward - or just DefinitionForward?
> Having "Dispatcher" in it's name implies, to me at least, that this is
> an action which will take a parameter and do something based on what
> that parameter is - like the DispatchAction! Does it embody this
> behavior too, and I just don't know it? I'd personally like to see
> DefinitionDispatcherAction deprecated in favor of a more appropriately
> named class that does the same exact thing.
>
> Comments? Did I just waaaaaaaaaaaaaay totally miss something?
>
> How's the self-generating beer endeavor going? James? Mark? ;-) LOL
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>