You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@training.apache.org by gautam gupta <gr...@gmail.com> on 2019/11/20 23:52:42 UTC
PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
Hi There,
Any update on this PR for Apache Hadoop. Is it good to merge?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
thanks,
Gautam
Re: PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
Posted by gautam gupta <gr...@gmail.com>.
@Ryan Thanks for the useful PR comments. I have taken care of these in
Slides. Please review and let me know what you think.
I agree with Dmitriy, that we should start small and make it an iterative
process to reach the target state.
Best regards,
Gautam
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 3:13 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I would say there is no too small contribution. If course is not full and
> it is just a beginning, it may encourage experts to correct, add materials.
>
> So before committing to master I suggest us do not have a threshold.
>
> But if we talk about release and publish it on the site, it is
> slightly another story. Here I would say `minimal usefulness` bar could
> make sense.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 13:07, Ryan Skraba <ry...@skraba.com>:
>
> > There's probably an aspect can be discussed by the community as well!
> >
> > The Hadoop project is larger than can be discussed in 6 slides -- the
> > training materials in the PR wouldn't be sufficient for either
> > self-guided training or for a teacher to use directly. Absolutely no
> > disrespect intended! I've never designed a course myself, and I
> > imagine that it's a pretty challenging art (peeking at the syllabuses
> > of other courses: https://www.coursera.org/courses?query=hadoop)
> >
> > At the same time, if I _were_ someone with the expertise in course
> > design, I'd feel encouraged by having the project setup already in
> > place. If I were an expert in the subject matter, I'd be encouraged
> > by having slides ready to be improved.
> >
> > Have we already discussed this? Is there a "usefulness bar" that
> > needs to be passed for training content to be considered ready to be
> > included in master?
> >
> > All my best, Ryan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:44 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Gautam,
> > >
> > > Ryan added a number of remarks in the PR. I agree there, as well.
> > >
> > > Are you agree with this? Would you please address or reply about what
> do
> > > you think? You can use GitHub comments in
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >
> > > чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:52, gautam gupta <gr...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi There,
> > > > Any update on this PR for Apache Hadoop. Is it good to merge?
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Gautam
> > > >
> >
>
Re: PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
Posted by Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org>.
Hi Ryan,
I would say there is no too small contribution. If course is not full and
it is just a beginning, it may encourage experts to correct, add materials.
So before committing to master I suggest us do not have a threshold.
But if we talk about release and publish it on the site, it is
slightly another story. Here I would say `minimal usefulness` bar could
make sense.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 13:07, Ryan Skraba <ry...@skraba.com>:
> There's probably an aspect can be discussed by the community as well!
>
> The Hadoop project is larger than can be discussed in 6 slides -- the
> training materials in the PR wouldn't be sufficient for either
> self-guided training or for a teacher to use directly. Absolutely no
> disrespect intended! I've never designed a course myself, and I
> imagine that it's a pretty challenging art (peeking at the syllabuses
> of other courses: https://www.coursera.org/courses?query=hadoop)
>
> At the same time, if I _were_ someone with the expertise in course
> design, I'd feel encouraged by having the project setup already in
> place. If I were an expert in the subject matter, I'd be encouraged
> by having slides ready to be improved.
>
> Have we already discussed this? Is there a "usefulness bar" that
> needs to be passed for training content to be considered ready to be
> included in master?
>
> All my best, Ryan
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:44 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Gautam,
> >
> > Ryan added a number of remarks in the PR. I agree there, as well.
> >
> > Are you agree with this? Would you please address or reply about what do
> > you think? You can use GitHub comments in
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:52, gautam gupta <gr...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi There,
> > > Any update on this PR for Apache Hadoop. Is it good to merge?
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Gautam
> > >
>
Re: PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
Posted by Ryan Skraba <ry...@skraba.com>.
There's probably an aspect can be discussed by the community as well!
The Hadoop project is larger than can be discussed in 6 slides -- the
training materials in the PR wouldn't be sufficient for either
self-guided training or for a teacher to use directly. Absolutely no
disrespect intended! I've never designed a course myself, and I
imagine that it's a pretty challenging art (peeking at the syllabuses
of other courses: https://www.coursera.org/courses?query=hadoop)
At the same time, if I _were_ someone with the expertise in course
design, I'd feel encouraged by having the project setup already in
place. If I were an expert in the subject matter, I'd be encouraged
by having slides ready to be improved.
Have we already discussed this? Is there a "usefulness bar" that
needs to be passed for training content to be considered ready to be
included in master?
All my best, Ryan
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:44 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Gautam,
>
> Ryan added a number of remarks in the PR. I agree there, as well.
>
> Are you agree with this? Would you please address or reply about what do
> you think? You can use GitHub comments in
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:52, gautam gupta <gr...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi There,
> > Any update on this PR for Apache Hadoop. Is it good to merge?
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
> >
> > thanks,
> > Gautam
> >
Re: PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
Posted by Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org>.
Hi Gautam,
Ryan added a number of remarks in the PR. I agree there, as well.
Are you agree with this? Would you please address or reply about what do
you think? You can use GitHub comments in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:52, gautam gupta <gr...@gmail.com>:
> Hi There,
> Any update on this PR for Apache Hadoop. Is it good to merge?
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
>
> thanks,
> Gautam
>