Re: [io] is 2.0 on Maven?

[Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>]

Niall Pemberton wrote:

> The reason the existing groupId was used was because it was a compatible
> release and so far in Commons we have not collectively or individually
> decided to relocate artifacts in that scenario.
> 
> Its probably a discussion we should have over on dev@. Although it will
> create issues for users relocating all our artifacts (and adding
> redirection poms) - it is something that can be resolved by a user (AFAIK
> they just have to remove old artifacts from the local repo). I'm starting
> to think we should just bite the bullet and do it.

There's no reason for a relocation pom. It will even make things worse, 
because suddenly versions are treated as updates which we explicitly 
considered not tpo be.

-1 for any relocation POM in commons.

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org