You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> on 2014/08/27 17:01:45 UTC
URI rules don't see IMG source URLs
All:
I just ran a test and was surprised to see that uri rules don't see the
src="" URL in an image tag.
Is there a specific reason we *don't* want uri rules to see those?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ignorance is no excuse for a law.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Exercise Your Rights day
Re: URI rules don't see IMG source URLs
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, John Hardin wrote:
> All:
>
> I just ran a test and was surprised to see that uri rules don't see the
> src="" URL in an image tag.
Frack. Never mind, the test message was malformed. uri rules *do* see img
tag src URIs.
{More coffee...}
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
No representation without taxation!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Exercise Your Rights day
Re: URI rules don't see IMG source URLs
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
On 8/27/2014 11:01 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> I just ran a test and was surprised to see that uri rules don't see
> the src="" URL in an image tag.
>
> Is there a specific reason we *don't* want uri rules to see those?
Can't think of why not. Sounds like an interesting addition to the code.