You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Hyukjin Kwon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/05/21 04:01:18 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-16365) Ideas for moving "mllib-local"
forward
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Hyukjin Kwon updated SPARK-16365:
---------------------------------
Labels: bulk-closed (was: )
> Ideas for moving "mllib-local" forward
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-16365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16365
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Components: ML
> Reporter: Nick Pentreath
> Priority: Major
> Labels: bulk-closed
>
> Since SPARK-13944 is all done, we should all think about what the "next steps" might be for {{mllib-local}}. E.g., it could be "improve Spark's linear algebra", or "investigate how we will implement local models/pipelines in Spark", etc.
> This ticket is for comments, ideas, brainstormings and PoCs. The separation of linalg into a standalone project turned out to be significantly more complex than originally expected. So I vote we devote sufficient discussion and time to planning out the next move :)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org