You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Joel Knighton (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/06/14 14:02:01 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-12003) Not filtering Data completely
when where clause is applied to clustering column
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15329547#comment-15329547 ]
Joel Knighton commented on CASSANDRA-12003:
-------------------------------------------
Is it possible to attach the full schema of this table? Details like column names shouldn't be important, so feel free to anonymize those as appropriate.
> Not filtering Data completely when where clause is applied to clustering column
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-12003
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12003
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Local Write-Read Paths
> Environment: Production
> Reporter: Bhuvan Rawal
> Fix For: 3.8
>
>
> On issuing this query:;
> select id,filter_name from navigation_bucket_filter where id=2429 and filter_name='Size_s';
> id | filter_name
> ------+----------------------
> 2429 | AdditionalProperty_s
> 2429 | Brand
> ------------more rows-------
> 2429 | Size_s
> ------------more rows-------
> 2429 | sdFullfilled
> 2429 | sellerCode
> (16 rows)
> Whereas only one result was expected (Row bearing filter_name - Size_s), we got that result but along with 15 other unexpected rows..
> Total number of rows in the partition are 20 (Verified using select id,filter_name from navigation_bucket_filter where id=2429;) as well as json dump. We are wondering why Cassandra could not filter the results completely. I have checked that the data is intact by taking json dump and validating using sstabledump tool.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)