You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Aryeh Katz <ar...@secured-services.com> on 2004/01/26 18:32:50 UTC
page out of date
http://apache.get-software.com/httpd/binaries/win32/README.html
doesn't have the correct version numbers.
As an aside, would it make more sense to use SSI, and get the version
number from the SERVER_SOFTWARE environment variable (I assume
apache.org will always be running the most up to date version of apache).
--
Aryeh Katz
SecureD Services
http://www.secured-services.com/
410 653 0700 x 2
Re: page out of date
Posted by Erik Abele <er...@codefaktor.de>.
On 26.01.2004, at 18:32, Aryeh Katz wrote:
> http://apache.get-software.com/httpd/binaries/win32/README.html
> doesn't have the correct version numbers.
Fixed (also in HEADER.html).
> As an aside, would it make more sense to use SSI, and get the version
> number from the SERVER_SOFTWARE environment variable (I assume
> apache.org will always be running the most up to date version of
> apache).
Perhaps on apache.org this would be doable but keep in mind that we
don't have any control over the mirrors (see your URL above!).
Furthermore there's usually only one version of Apache running, 1.3 or
2.0, so how would we get to the other version number?
Cheers,
Erik
> --
> Aryeh Katz
> SecureD Services
> http://www.secured-services.com/
> 410 653 0700 x 2
Re: page out of date
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 11:32 AM 1/26/2004, Aryeh Katz wrote:
>http://apache.get-software.com/httpd/binaries/win32/README.html
>doesn't have the correct version numbers.
I see this is fix is committed already, thank you for the observation.
>As an aside, would it make more sense to use SSI, and get the version number from the SERVER_SOFTWARE environment variable (I assume apache.org will always be running the most up to date version of apache).
<chuckle> Short of the fact we usually run a more-up-to-date than current
version (some form of -dev, often 2.1-dev), we have two different current
versions, that of 1.3 and of 2.0. I await feedback before blessing these
official releases - and this time there was no feedback to be blessed.
Became current just by default.
Bill