You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Neil Conway <ne...@gmail.com> on 2017/07/05 23:16:05 UTC

Re: Review Request 60346: Improved the documentation of 'TASK_LOST'.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60346/#review179725
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!





include/mesos/mesos.proto
Lines 1940 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60346/#comment254563>

    We don't support the "strict-registry" flag anymore, so I removed the reference to this before committing.


- Neil Conway


On June 21, 2017, 10:17 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60346/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 21, 2017, 10:17 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7662
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7662
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updated the protobuf comments to clarify that 'TASK_LOST' is not
> always a terminal state.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 38449da44a5288afc7e2ef17ef5e1380ecabd5d2 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 81eca47ce1074f5e522a0410f01ab2b2cfc76aa2 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60346/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> None, this is not functional change.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gastón Kleiman
> 
>