You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by L K <xd...@outlook.com> on 2023/09/22 07:10:28 UTC

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community,

This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.

This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.

The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/

The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248

Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4


Hash for the release tag:
1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9

Release Notes:
https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4


The artifacts have been signed with Key :
29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS

Checklist for reference,
Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
Fill in the following:

[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct

And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.

Please vote accordingly:

[ ] +1 approve

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason



Thanks,
The Apache RocketMQ Team

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org>.
+1, I checked<br/><br/>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.<br/>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.<br/>[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.<br/>[OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.<br/>[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.<br/>[OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start<br/>[OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
>This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
>The artifacts:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
>
>The staging repo:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
>
>Git tag for the release:
>https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
>
>
>Hash for the release tag:
>1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
>
>Release Notes:
>https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
>
>
>The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys file:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>Checklist for reference,
>Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
>Fill in the following:
>
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
>[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>The Apache RocketMQ Team

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org>.
+1, I checked<br/><br/>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.<br/>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.<br/>[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.<br/>[OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.<br/>[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.<br/>[OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start<br/>[OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
>This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
>The artifacts:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
>
>The staging repo:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
>
>Git tag for the release:
>https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
>
>
>Hash for the release tag:
>1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
>
>Release Notes:
>https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
>
>
>The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys file:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>Checklist for reference,
>Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
>Fill in the following:
>
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
>[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>The Apache RocketMQ Team

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by zhimin li <li...@gmail.com>.
+1

zhouxzhan <zh...@apache.org> 于2023年9月26日周二 13:55写道:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:44 PM fuyou <fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道:
> >
> > > +1(Non-binding)
> > > I've checked:
> > >
> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > > release.
> > > [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > > [OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > > [OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > > >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > > >
> > > >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> > > >
> > > >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> > > >
> > > >The artifacts:
> > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> > > >
> > > >The staging repo:
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> > > >
> > > >Git tag for the release:
> > > >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Hash for the release tag:
> > > >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> > > >
> > > >Release Notes:
> > > >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > > >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> > > file:
> > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > > >
> > > >Checklist for reference,
> > > >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> > releases.
> > > >Fill in the following:
> > > >
> > > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > >[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > > >[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > >[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > > >[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > > >[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > > >[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > >[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > >[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > > >[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > > >[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > > >
> > > >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> > > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> > > >
> > > >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > > votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > >Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > >[ ] +1 approve
> > > >
> > > >[ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >
> > > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >The Apache RocketMQ Team
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >    =============================================
> >
> >   fuyou001
> > Best Regards
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by zhouxzhan <zh...@apache.org>.
+1

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:44 PM fuyou <fu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道:
>
> > +1(Non-binding)
> > I've checked:
> >
> > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > [OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > [OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> >
> >
> > At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> > >
> > >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> > >
> > >The artifacts:
> > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> > >
> > >The staging repo:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> > >
> > >Git tag for the release:
> > >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> > >
> > >
> > >Hash for the release tag:
> > >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> > >
> > >Release Notes:
> > >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> > >
> > >
> > >The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> > file:
> > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > >
> > >Checklist for reference,
> > >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> releases.
> > >Fill in the following:
> > >
> > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > >[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> > >[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > >[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > >[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > >[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > >[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > >[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > >[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > >[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > >[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > >
> > >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> > >
> > >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> > >
> > >Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > >[ ] +1 approve
> > >
> > >[ ] +0 no opinion
> > >
> > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
>
>
> --
>    =============================================
>
>   fuyou001
> Best Regards
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by zhouxzhan <zh...@apache.org>.
+1

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:44 PM fuyou <fu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道:
>
> > +1(Non-binding)
> > I've checked:
> >
> > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > [OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > [OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> >
> >
> > At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> > >
> > >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> > >
> > >The artifacts:
> > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> > >
> > >The staging repo:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> > >
> > >Git tag for the release:
> > >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> > >
> > >
> > >Hash for the release tag:
> > >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> > >
> > >Release Notes:
> > >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> > >
> > >
> > >The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> > file:
> > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > >
> > >Checklist for reference,
> > >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> releases.
> > >Fill in the following:
> > >
> > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > >[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> > >[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > >[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > >[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > >[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > >[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > >[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > >[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > >[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > >[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > >
> > >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> > >
> > >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> > >
> > >Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > >[ ] +1 approve
> > >
> > >[ ] +0 no opinion
> > >
> > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
>
>
> --
>    =============================================
>
>   fuyou001
> Best Regards
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by fuyou <fu...@gmail.com>.
+1

Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道:

> +1(Non-binding)
> I've checked:
>
> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> [OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>
>
> At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >
> >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> >
> >The artifacts:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> >
> >The staging repo:
> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> >
> >Git tag for the release:
> >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> >
> >
> >Hash for the release tag:
> >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> >
> >Release Notes:
> >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> >
> >
> >The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> >Checklist for reference,
> >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> >Fill in the following:
> >
> >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> >[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> >[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> >[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> >[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> >[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> >[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> >[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> >[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> >[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> >[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> >
> >Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


-- 
   =============================================

  fuyou001
Best Regards

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by fuyou <fu...@gmail.com>.
+1

Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道:

> +1(Non-binding)
> I've checked:
>
> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> [OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>
>
> At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >
> >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> >
> >The artifacts:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> >
> >The staging repo:
> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> >
> >Git tag for the release:
> >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> >
> >
> >Hash for the release tag:
> >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> >
> >Release Notes:
> >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> >
> >
> >The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> >Checklist for reference,
> >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> >Fill in the following:
> >
> >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> >[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> >[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> >[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> >[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> >[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> >[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> >[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> >[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> >[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> >[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> >[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> >
> >Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


-- 
   =============================================

  fuyou001
Best Regards

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org>.
+1(Non-binding)
I've checked:

[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
[OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct



At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
>This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
>The artifacts:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
>
>The staging repo:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
>
>Git tag for the release:
>https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
>
>
>Hash for the release tag:
>1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
>
>Release Notes:
>https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
>
>
>The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys file:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>Checklist for reference,
>Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
>Fill in the following:
>
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
>[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>The Apache RocketMQ Team

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by lollipop <lo...@apache.org>.
+1

I have checked:
[OK ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the source package.
[OK ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
release.
[OK ]  License and Notice are correct in the source package.

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 2:01 PM qiaoao <qi...@foxmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> > 2023年9月22日 15:10,L K <xd...@outlook.com> 写道:
> >
> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >
> > This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> >
> > The artifacts:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> >
> > The staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> >
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> > 1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> >
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > 29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> > Checklist for reference,
> > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> releases.
> > Fill in the following:
> >
> > []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > []  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> > []  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > []  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > []  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > []  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > []  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > []  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > []  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > []  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > []  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by qiaoao <qi...@foxmail.com>.
+1

> 2023年9月22日 15:10,L K <xd...@outlook.com> 写道:
> 
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
> 
> This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> 
> This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> 
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> 
> The staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> 
> 
> Hash for the release tag:
> 1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> 
> Release Notes:
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> 
> 
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> 29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> 
> Checklist for reference,
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> Fill in the following:
> 
> []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> []  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> []  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> []  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> []  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> []  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> []  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> []  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> []  The code can be built success in the source package.
> []  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> []  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> 
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> 
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> 
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team


Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

Posted by Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org>.
+1(Non-binding)
I've checked:

[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
[OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct



At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xd...@outlook.com> wrote:
>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
>This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
>The artifacts:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
>
>The staging repo:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
>
>Git tag for the release:
>https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
>
>
>Hash for the release tag:
>1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
>
>Release Notes:
>https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
>
>
>The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys file:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>Checklist for reference,
>Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
>Fill in the following:
>
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>[]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
>[]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>[]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
>[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>The Apache RocketMQ Team