You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "zhijiang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/23 07:27:44 UTC

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-5893) Race condition in removing previous JobManagerRegistration in ResourceManager

zhijiang created FLINK-5893:
-------------------------------

             Summary: Race condition in removing previous JobManagerRegistration in ResourceManager
                 Key: FLINK-5893
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5893
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: ResourceManager
            Reporter: zhijiang


The map of {{JobManagerRegistration}} in {{ResourceManager}} is not thread-safe, and currently there may be two threads to operate the map concurrently to bring unexpected results.

The scenario is like this :

{{registerJobManager}}: When the job leader changes and the new JobManager leader registers to ResourceManager, the new {{JobManagerRegistration}} will replace the old one in the map with the same key {{JobID}}. This process is triggered by rpc thread.

Meanwhile, the {{JobLeaderIdService}} in ResourceManager could be aware of job leader change and trigger the action {{jobLeaderLostLeadership}} in another thread. In this action, it will remove the previous {{JobManagerRegistration}} from the map by {{JobID}}, but the old {{JobManagerRegistration}} may be already replaced by the new one from {{registerJobManager}}.

In summary, this race condition may cause the new {{JobManagerRegistration}} removed from ResourceManager, resulting in exception when request slot from ResourceManager.

Consider the solution of this issue, the {{jobLeaderLostLeadership}} can be scheduled by {{runAsync}} in rpc thread and no need to bring extra lock for the map.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)