You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-user@db.apache.org by Ma...@de.equens.com on 2011/11/22 12:08:52 UTC

Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Hi,

I have an application using embedded derby (10.8.1.2). In the program I use a little routine that ends with rollback, commit or nothing at all, by using a parameter.

In a certain mode I just do a select, so As far I concern I don't need to do neither rollback nor commit, since it is just a select.

But I get then always an Exception:

 

Eine Verbindung kann nicht beendet werden, solange noch eine Transaktion aktiv ist.

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.newSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.checkForTransactionInProgress(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.close(Unknown Source)

 

That obviously is the code 25001

 

Even though I initialize all my prepared statements that also are inserts and updates, in this mode only a select statement is used.

How come I get such a Exception. It seems that I have to commit or rollback always I quit a derby program even though no change has occurred on particular database

 

Or is there something I should care about?

Equens SE

Malte Kempff

Core Applications/ Change Bulk Payments

Tel:      +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60417

Fax:     +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60290

mail to:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com 

 

Equens SE
Mainzer Landstraße 201
60326 Frankfurt
Germany
Tel: +49(0)69-589993-09
Fax: +49(0)69-589993-60300
Amtsgericht Frankfurt HRB 84 429
http://www.equens.com <http://www.equens.com/>  

info@de.equens.com <ma...@de.equens.com>     


Vorstand: Michael Steinbach (Vorstandsvorsitzender)
Alessandro Baroni
Dr. Götz Möller
Jan Sonneveld
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Erik Dralans
Sitz: 3526 LB Utrecht, Niederlande, Eendrachtlaan 315, Handelskammer 3022.0519

 


Re: AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Posted by Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>.
On 11/22/2011 04:01 AM, Peter Ondruška wrote:
> I would extend your question: is there any difference in commit or rollback after single select statement?

Nothing much that I ever found. I always use commit to complete my selects,
because it feels cleaner, at the application level, to use rollback only when
I am intending to undo an operation.

thanks,

bryan


Re: AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Posted by Peter Ondruška <pe...@kaibo.eu>.
I would extend your question: is there any difference in commit or rollback
after single select statement?
Dne 22.11.2011 12:45 <Ma...@de.equens.com> napsal(a):

> **
>
> So what would be the best practice using a rollback or a commit when just
> reading a database?****
>
> ** **
>
> Malte****
>  ------------------------------
>
> *Von:* Florin.Herinean@sungard.com [mailto:Florin.Herinean@sungard.com]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:14
> *An:* derby-user@db.apache.org
> *Betreff:* AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?****
>
> ** **
>
> That is not derby specific. In any db selects are part of transactions
> too. So either you enable autocommit or you explicitly commit your
> transaction(s) before releasing the connection. Commit will release the
> locks you acquired on the db (read locks if you haven’t modified anything).
> ********
>
> ** ******
>
> Cheers,********
>
> ** ******
>
> **Florin**********
>
> ** ******
>
> *Von:* Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com [mailto:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:09
> *An:* derby-user@db.apache.org
> *Betreff:* Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?********
>
> ** ******
>
> Hi,********
>
> I have an application using embedded derby (10.8.1.2). In the program I
> use a little routine that ends with rollback, commit or nothing at all, by
> using a parameter.********
>
> In a certain mode I just do a select, so As far I concern I don't need to
> do neither rollback nor commit, since it is just a select.********
>
> But I get then always an Exception:********
>
> ** ******
>
> Eine Verbindung kann nicht beendet werden, solange noch eine Transaktion
> aktiv ist.****
> ****
>
>       at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown
> Source)****
> ****
>
>       at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown
> Source)****
> ****
>
>       at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown
> Source)****
> ****
>
>       at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Unknown
> Source)****
> ****
>
>       at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.newSQLException(Unknown Source)
> ****
> ****
>
>       at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.checkForTransactionInProgress(Unknown
> Source)****
> ****
>
>       at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.close(Unknown Source)*
> ***
> ****
>
> ** ******
>
> That obviously is the code 25001********
>
> ** ******
>
> Even though I initialize all my prepared statements that also are inserts
> and updates, in this mode only a select statement is used.********
>
> How come I get such a Exception. It seems that I have to commit or
> rollback always I quit a derby program even though no change has occurred
> on particular database********
>
> ** ******
>
> Or is there something I should care about?********
>
> Equens SE********
>
> Malte Kempff****
> ****
>
> Core Applications/ Change Bulk Payments********
>
> Tel:      +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60417********
>
> Fax:     +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60290********
>
> mail to:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com ********
>
> ** ******
>
> Equens SE
> Mainzer Landstraße 201
> 60326 Frankfurt
> Germany
> Tel: +49(0)69-589993-09
> Fax: +49(0)69-589993-60300
> Amtsgericht Frankfurt HRB 84 429
> http://www.equens.com ****
> ****
>
> info@de.equens.com    ****
> ****
>
>
> Vorstand: Michael Steinbach (Vorstandsvorsitzender)
> Alessandro Baroni
> Dr. Götz Möller
> Jan Sonneveld
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Erik Dralans
> Sitz: 3526 LB Utrecht, Niederlande, Eendrachtlaan 315, Handelskammer
> 3022.0519********
>
> ** ******
>

AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Posted by Fl...@sungard.com.
I'd say commit. Commit is the regular operation when all works as expected.

Florin

Von: Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com [mailto:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:45
An: derby-user@db.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

So what would be the best practice using a rollback or a commit when just reading a database?

Malte
________________________________
Von: Florin.Herinean@sungard.com<ma...@sungard.com> [mailto:Florin.Herinean@sungard.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:14
An: derby-user@db.apache.org<ma...@db.apache.org>
Betreff: AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

That is not derby specific. In any db selects are part of transactions too. So either you enable autocommit or you explicitly commit your transaction(s) before releasing the connection. Commit will release the locks you acquired on the db (read locks if you haven't modified anything).

Cheers,

Florin

Von: Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com<ma...@de.equens.com> [mailto:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:09
An: derby-user@db.apache.org<ma...@db.apache.org>
Betreff: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Hi,
I have an application using embedded derby (10.8.1.2). In the program I use a little routine that ends with rollback, commit or nothing at all, by using a parameter.
In a certain mode I just do a select, so As far I concern I don't need to do neither rollback nor commit, since it is just a select.
But I get then always an Exception:

Eine Verbindung kann nicht beendet werden, solange noch eine Transaktion aktiv ist.
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.newSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.checkForTransactionInProgress(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.close(Unknown Source)

That obviously is the code 25001

Even though I initialize all my prepared statements that also are inserts and updates, in this mode only a select statement is used.
How come I get such a Exception. It seems that I have to commit or rollback always I quit a derby program even though no change has occurred on particular database

Or is there something I should care about?

Equens SE

Malte Kempff
Core Applications/ Change Bulk Payments
Tel:      +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60417
Fax:     +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60290
mail to:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com

Equens SE
Mainzer Landstraße 201
60326 Frankfurt
Germany
Tel: +49(0)69-589993-09
Fax: +49(0)69-589993-60300
Amtsgericht Frankfurt HRB 84 429
http://www.equens.com<http://www.equens.com/>
info@de.equens.com<ma...@de.equens.com>

Vorstand: Michael Steinbach (Vorstandsvorsitzender)
Alessandro Baroni
Dr. Götz Möller
Jan Sonneveld
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Erik Dralans
Sitz: 3526 LB Utrecht, Niederlande, Eendrachtlaan 315, Handelskammer 3022.0519


AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Posted by Ma...@de.equens.com.
So what would be the best practice using a rollback or a commit when just reading a database?

 

Malte

________________________________

Von: Florin.Herinean@sungard.com [mailto:Florin.Herinean@sungard.com] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:14
An: derby-user@db.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

 

That is not derby specific. In any db selects are part of transactions too. So either you enable autocommit or you explicitly commit your transaction(s) before releasing the connection. Commit will release the locks you acquired on the db (read locks if you haven't modified anything).

 

Cheers,

 

Florin

 

Von: Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com [mailto:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:09
An: derby-user@db.apache.org
Betreff: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

 

Hi,

I have an application using embedded derby (10.8.1.2). In the program I use a little routine that ends with rollback, commit or nothing at all, by using a parameter.

In a certain mode I just do a select, so As far I concern I don't need to do neither rollback nor commit, since it is just a select.

But I get then always an Exception:

 

Eine Verbindung kann nicht beendet werden, solange noch eine Transaktion aktiv ist.

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.newSQLException(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.checkForTransactionInProgress(Unknown Source)

      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.close(Unknown Source)

 

That obviously is the code 25001

 

Even though I initialize all my prepared statements that also are inserts and updates, in this mode only a select statement is used.

How come I get such a Exception. It seems that I have to commit or rollback always I quit a derby program even though no change has occurred on particular database

 

Or is there something I should care about?

Equens SE

Malte Kempff

Core Applications/ Change Bulk Payments

Tel:      +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60417

Fax:     +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60290

mail to:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com 

 

Equens SE
Mainzer Landstraße 201
60326 Frankfurt
Germany
Tel: +49(0)69-589993-09
Fax: +49(0)69-589993-60300
Amtsgericht Frankfurt HRB 84 429
http://www.equens.com <http://www.equens.com/>  

info@de.equens.com <ma...@de.equens.com>     


Vorstand: Michael Steinbach (Vorstandsvorsitzender)
Alessandro Baroni
Dr. Götz Möller
Jan Sonneveld
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Erik Dralans
Sitz: 3526 LB Utrecht, Niederlande, Eendrachtlaan 315, Handelskammer 3022.0519

 


AW: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Posted by Fl...@sungard.com.
That is not derby specific. In any db selects are part of transactions too. So either you enable autocommit or you explicitly commit your transaction(s) before releasing the connection. Commit will release the locks you acquired on the db (read locks if you haven't modified anything).

Cheers,

Florin

Von: Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com [mailto:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 12:09
An: derby-user@db.apache.org
Betreff: Does derby ned allways a rollback or commt?

Hi,
I have an application using embedded derby (10.8.1.2). In the program I use a little routine that ends with rollback, commit or nothing at all, by using a parameter.
In a certain mode I just do a select, so As far I concern I don't need to do neither rollback nor commit, since it is just a select.
But I get then always an Exception:

Eine Verbindung kann nicht beendet werden, solange noch eine Transaktion aktiv ist.
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.newSQLException(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.checkForTransactionInProgress(Unknown Source)
      at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.close(Unknown Source)

That obviously is the code 25001

Even though I initialize all my prepared statements that also are inserts and updates, in this mode only a select statement is used.
How come I get such a Exception. It seems that I have to commit or rollback always I quit a derby program even though no change has occurred on particular database

Or is there something I should care about?

Equens SE

Malte Kempff
Core Applications/ Change Bulk Payments
Tel:      +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60417
Fax:     +49(0)69/58 99 93 - 60290
mail to:Malte.Kempff@de.equens.com

Equens SE
Mainzer Landstraße 201
60326 Frankfurt
Germany
Tel: +49(0)69-589993-09
Fax: +49(0)69-589993-60300
Amtsgericht Frankfurt HRB 84 429
http://www.equens.com<http://www.equens.com/>
info@de.equens.com<ma...@de.equens.com>

Vorstand: Michael Steinbach (Vorstandsvorsitzender)
Alessandro Baroni
Dr. Götz Möller
Jan Sonneveld
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Erik Dralans
Sitz: 3526 LB Utrecht, Niederlande, Eendrachtlaan 315, Handelskammer 3022.0519