You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by Christian Parpart <cp...@t-online.de> on 2000/12/20 04:55:26 UTC

Tomcat2 C2: log file: namespace not supported vs. sitemap not available

Hi

I just got the latest CVS code from C2 and build the webapp.
Now I have the cocoon.war and I put it into the webapps 
directory of Tomcat. Then I've restarted Tomcat with 'startup'
and typed in the browser http://localhost/cocoon.

Here I get the message 'The sitemap handler's sitemap is not available.'

But after taking a look into the log file from C2 
(webapps/cocoon/WEB-INF/logs/cocoon.log) I saw that there're some more
initial exceptions, such as 'Namespace not supported by SAXParser'.

I don't know how to fix that problem (btw. I think that these exception
causes the sitemap error) and for more understanding I attached the log
file to this mail, please take a look at it.

I hope there's anyone who knows how to fix that..

Thank's in adwance

Regards,
Christian Parpart
SurakWare
cparpart@surakware.com
http://www.surakware.com

xsp handling java result sets

Posted by Brendan Corcoran <br...@jenisys.com.au>.
Hi,

I want to know the "most logical" way to include dynamically changing result
sets in Cocoon.

We have Cocoon calling a CORBA component which returns a java.sql.ResultSet
which contains a dynamic number of rows and columns.  I want to "separate"
the programming complexities into namespace tags in order to clean up the
source xml and xsl files.

However, how do I handle dynamically changing result sets in an xml file
when I don't want to have any <xsp:logic> elements within the <page> element
of the source xml file, or in the xsl file that handles the html markup?
Only want <xsp:logic> in the tag library definitions to fully separate
logic, content etc....

I defined a namespace tag that returned an xml string containing my result
set to the xml file, however this wasn't interpreted correctly in the xsl
transform, and it doesn't seem to be the "correct" way to do it.

Am I missing something fundamental?

thanks for your help,

Brendan