Performance metrics between iBatis and Hibernate 3.2, or 3.x and above

[mule_user <sg...@aol.com>]

Is any metrics avialble on performance comparisons between iBatis and
Hibernate 3.2, or 3.x and above?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-metrics-between-iBatis-and-Hibernate-3.2%2C-or-3.x-and-above-tp18893258p18893258.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance metrics between iBatis and Hibernate 3.2, or 3.x and above

[Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com>]

I think we stopped comparing performance metrics about 4 years ago. :-)

Generally speaking:

  * iBATIS has better query and load performance, from SQL to Object.

  * Hibernate has a better caching subsystem made possible by the additional
information it has about the table/class mappings.

Both support batch updates and join mapping.  Any differences in the actual
framework code will be marginal compared to the cost of accessing the
database itself.

So different applications will perform very differently and some will
benefit from iBATIS and others from Hibernate.  They aren't directly
comparable.

Clinton

On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:48 AM, mule_user <sg...@aol.com> wrote:

>
> Is any metrics avialble on performance comparisons between iBatis and
> Hibernate 3.2, or 3.x and above?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Performance-metrics-between-iBatis-and-Hibernate-3.2%2C-or-3.x-and-above-tp18893258p18893258.html
> Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>