Reverting, WAS: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_mem_cache.c

[Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>]

On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 03:48, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > Looks like 21287 it is not a valid defect based on your explanation.
> > How do I rev back my changes?
> 
> Here is how you can see the patch:
> 
> cvs diff -u -r 1.102 -r 1.103 mod_mem_cache.c
> 
> revison numbers are from cvs.apache.org.
> 
> Verify the diff above and if it is the one you want to revert,
> I believe you can roll it back thusly:
> 
> cvs update -j 1.103 -j 1.102 mod_mem_cache.c

Or, if you want to stick with familiar syntax:

$ cvs diff -u -r 1.103 -r 1.102 mod_mem_cache.c | patch


Sander

Re: Reverting, WAS: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_mem_cache.c

[Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>]

Sander Striker wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 03:48, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> 
>>>Looks like 21287 it is not a valid defect based on your explanation.
>>>How do I rev back my changes?
>>
>>Here is how you can see the patch:
>>
>>cvs diff -u -r 1.102 -r 1.103 mod_mem_cache.c
>>
>>revison numbers are from cvs.apache.org.
>>
>>Verify the diff above and if it is the one you want to revert,
>>I believe you can roll it back thusly:
>>
>>cvs update -j 1.103 -j 1.102 mod_mem_cache.c
> 
> 
> Or, if you want to stick with familiar syntax:
> 
> $ cvs diff -u -r 1.103 -r 1.102 mod_mem_cache.c | patch
> 
> 
> Sander
> 

Much better.

Bill