You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@tvm.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/02/12 07:36:48 UTC

[GitHub] [tvm] manupa-arm commented on pull request #7428: Add pass to annotate ops with on_device for non-BYOC heterogeneous

manupa-arm commented on pull request #7428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7428#issuecomment-778032238


   I also have the same concern as @comaniac. Maybe we should slowly stop using the word "BYOC", it makes it sound "external".
   
   I think we can have a unified infra to dispatch IRModule --> runtime.Module compilation flows. I don't see an immediate concern why we cant use the current "BYOC" partitioning infra to generate the cpu, gpu targets as well.  
   
   Love to hear thoughts on this and see the roadblocks of unifying these approaches. I guess that helps to have a unfied TargetRegistry as well.
   
   cc : @tqchen 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org