You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/30 21:46:09 UTC
Re: svn commit: r451649 - /lucene/nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
pkosiorowski@apache.org wrote:
> Author: pkosiorowski
> Date: Sat Sep 30 12:38:30 2006
> New Revision: 451649
welcome back!
--
Sami Siren
Re: svn commit: r451649 - /lucene/nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
Posted by JP Nutch <jp...@yahoo.com>.
Hi all,
I would like to throw my vote for moving to 0.9 release
as soon as possible. My main reasons:
1. My Nutch-based application code is Java 1.5
2. It will easier for the Nutch team to upgade/keep in sync to
the latest Hadoop releases
Best regards:
jp
Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org> wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
>>
>> Example: we should upgrade branch 0.8 to use hadoop-0.5, but we will
>
> Wouldn't this change the requirement for java version also from 1.4 to 5?
AFAIR hadoop 0.5 is still 1.4 compatible (something to be checked,
though ...)
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1ยข/min.
Re: svn commit: r451649 - /lucene/nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Sami Siren wrote:
>>
>> Example: we should upgrade branch 0.8 to use hadoop-0.5, but we will
>
> Wouldn't this change the requirement for java version also from 1.4 to 5?
AFAIR hadoop 0.5 is still 1.4 compatible (something to be checked,
though ...)
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: svn commit: r451649 - /lucene/nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
>
> Example: we should upgrade branch 0.8 to use hadoop-0.5, but we will
Wouldn't this change the requirement for java version also from 1.4 to 5?
--
Sami Siren
Re: svn commit: r451649 - /lucene/nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Sami Siren wrote:
> Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
>>
>> I am looking at some easy JIRA issues to get back into Nutch now. I have
>> not seen any plans for releases on the list (I might have missed
>> something a but I tried to at least read the nutch lists) - do we have
>> some plans? Do we want to make a 0.8.2 release or rather go for 0.9 in
>> near (lets say - few months) future?
>
> There is no concrete plans on 0.9.0 yet. IMO committing fixes to 0.8
> branch is worth the effort as long as we do not know better, with new
> features to 0.8 I would think twice.
>
> What do others think?
Well, as the name suggests, we should commit only bug fixes to 0.8.x,
and new features should be committed to 0.9 - unless there are very
strong reasons to port some feature to the 0.8 branch, which we can
discuss case-by-case.
Example: we should upgrade branch 0.8 to use hadoop-0.5, but we will
never upgrade it to use hadoop-0.6.x - this version should go to the
current trunk, which will become 0.9 release at some point in time.
Another example: obeying "nocache" meta robots extension. I have a patch
which implements this. Although not a part of the standard, it is
significant from the legal point of view for those Nutch installations
that operate publicly. IMHO this is a feature that we may consider
adding to branch 0.8, as well as to trunk.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: svn commit: r451649 - /lucene/nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
>
> I am looking at some easy JIRA issues to get back into Nutch now. I have
> not seen any plans for releases on the list (I might have missed
> something a but I tried to at least read the nutch lists) - do we have
> some plans? Do we want to make a 0.8.2 release or rather go for 0.9 in
> near (lets say - few months) future?
There is no concrete plans on 0.9.0 yet. IMO committing fixes to 0.8
branch is worth the effort as long as we do not know better, with new
features to 0.8 I would think twice.
What do others think?
--
Sami Siren
Re: svn commit: r451649 - /lucene/nutch/trunk/CHANGES.txt
Posted by Piotr Kosiorowski <pk...@gmail.com>.
I am looking at some easy JIRA issues to get back into Nutch now. I have
not seen any plans for releases on the list (I might have missed
something a but I tried to at least read the nutch lists) - do we have
some plans? Do we want to make a 0.8.2 release or rather go for 0.9 in
near (lets say - few months) future?
Is committing fixes on 0.8 branch worth the effort?
Piotr
Sami Siren wrote:
> pkosiorowski@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: pkosiorowski
>> Date: Sat Sep 30 12:38:30 2006
>> New Revision: 451649
>
> welcome back!
>
> --
> Sami Siren
>