You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> on 2017/03/14 14:24:16 UTC
[DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ"
I have claimed the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ" in
jira[1], and according to yukon ever suggested, discuss this feature's
details in dev@list.
*Key Points*
1. The image will be based on CentOS 7 and JDK6.
2. Provider an docker image, including RocketMQ namesrv/broker/console.
Each one will be ran by different script argument, such as "docker run -it
/bin/namesrv.sh" .
3. Provider an docker-compose image to launch the three components at the
same time.
4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to submit a PR
to Docker Official Repo to make it to be an official image.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-126
Regards
Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ"
Posted by yukon <yu...@apache.org>.
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your interest in this feature.
For server, JDK7+ is better, only client supports JDK6.
About the second and third points, Do you mean provide 4 docker images,
three separate docker images for namesrv/broker/console, while the last is
a all-in-one docker image?
Regards,
yukon
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks, please let me know after you put the original project into new git
> external repository.
>
> 2017-03-15 9:59 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>:
>
> > Cool ~
> >
> >
> > In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is
> > some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it in
> > our new git external repository.
> >
> >
> > > 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > >
> > > 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to submit a
> > PR
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ"
Posted by dongeforever <10...@qq.com>.
Hi Rick：
I am testing the existed image now, and I would migrate it to rocketmq-external repository as soon as possible. IMO, build a new one is unnecessary, and polishing is welcome.
Regards
dongeforever
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Rick Zhang";<zh...@gmail.com>;
Date: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 07:12 PM
To: "dev"<de...@rocketmq.incubator.apache.org>; "vongosling"<vo...@apache.org>;
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ"
It seems last mail failed to send out. Repost~
Hi Von,
I haven't find the docker image you mentioned in last mail. Would you
migrate it to rocketmq-external repository, or I build a brand new one?
2017-03-21 15:24 GMT+08:00 Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Von,
>
> I haven't find the docker image you mentioned in last mail. Would you
> migrate it to rocketmq-external repository, or I build a brand new one?
>
>
> 2017-03-15 10:12 GMT+08:00 Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks, please let me know after you put the original project into new
>> git external repository.
>>
>> 2017-03-15 9:59 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> Cool ~
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is
>>> some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it in
>>> our new git external repository.
>>>
>>>
>>> > 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>> >
>>> > 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to submit
>>> a PR
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ"
Posted by Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>.
It seems last mail failed to send out. Repost~
Hi Von,
I haven't find the docker image you mentioned in last mail. Would you
migrate it to rocketmq-external repository, or I build a brand new one?
2017-03-21 15:24 GMT+08:00 Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Von,
>
> I haven't find the docker image you mentioned in last mail. Would you
> migrate it to rocketmq-external repository, or I build a brand new one?
>
>
> 2017-03-15 10:12 GMT+08:00 Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks, please let me know after you put the original project into new
>> git external repository.
>>
>> 2017-03-15 9:59 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> Cool ~
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is
>>> some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it in
>>> our new git external repository.
>>>
>>>
>>> > 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>> >
>>> > 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to submit
>>> a PR
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for RocketMQ"
Posted by Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, please let me know after you put the original project into new git
external repository.
2017-03-15 9:59 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>:
> Cool ~
>
>
> In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is
> some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it in
> our new git external repository.
>
>
> > 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to submit a
> PR
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for
RocketMQ"
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
Cool ~
In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it in our new git external repository.
> 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <zh...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to submit a PR