You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Edouard De Oliveira <do...@yahoo.fr> on 2009/06/22 20:30:31 UTC
Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
I would really like some comments on this one :)
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
Blog: http://tedorgwp.free.fr
WebSite: http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Edouard De Oliveira (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lundi, 22 Juin 2009, 20h28mn 07s
Objet : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Edouard De Oliveira updated DIRMINA-612:
----------------------------------------
Component/s: (was: Web Site / Documentation)
Handler
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-RC1)
2.0.0-M7
1 - These classes are pretty well documented
2 - They're badly named as the 'real handler' is in fact the SingleSessionIoHandlerDelegate and not the SingleSessionIoHandler.
As we have freezed the API can we still rename these as it is the source of the confusion ?
3 - Is it really a good idea to provide this package as it goes against scalability principles ? should we remove it completly ? for 2.0 ? 3.0 ? or just document the fact that it can suffer scalability problems (which would be compliant with api freeze) and maybe even mark these as deprecated ?
WDYT ?
> Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-612
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-612
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Handler
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M2
> Reporter: Geert Schuring
> Assignee: Edouard De Oliveira
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-M7
>
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> A normal multi-session IoHandler can be added to the acceptor using the "addHandler" method. However, when writing a single-session IoHandler I can't find any information about how to register it with the acceptor. The "addHandler" method doesn't accept single-session IoHandlers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re : Re : Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
Posted by Edouard De Oliveira <do...@yahoo.fr>.
done :)
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
Blog: http://tedorgwp.free.fr
WebSite: http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Mardi, 23 Juin 2009, 22h19mn 00s
Objet : Re: Re : Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
> We may have users out there using it so i think adding some doco, marking it as deprecated and coumenting the fact it isn't scalable should be enough for 2.0
> Should i also at the same time mark the netty2 package as deprecated as obviously we also won't delete it but won't support it for 2.0 ?
yep. @deprecate those guys...
> These two will be removed later on for 2.1 or 3.0 ...
>
Maybe adding a JIRA about that for 3.0 can be usefull.
Thanks Edouard !
-- --
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: Re : Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on
SingleSessionIohandler
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
> We may have users out there using it so i think adding some doco, marking it as deprecated and coumenting the fact it isn't scalable should be enough for 2.0
>
> Should i also at the same time mark the netty2 package as deprecated as obviously we also won't delete it but won't support it for 2.0 ?
>
yep. @deprecate those guys...
> These two will be removed later on for 2.1 or 3.0 ...
>
Maybe adding a JIRA about that for 3.0 can be usefull.
Thanks Edouard !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re : Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
Posted by Edouard De Oliveira <do...@yahoo.fr>.
We may have users out there using it so i think adding some doco, marking it as deprecated and coumenting the fact it isn't scalable should be enough for 2.0
Should i also at the same time mark the netty2 package as deprecated as obviously we also won't delete it but won't support it for 2.0 ?
These two will be removed later on for 2.1 or 3.0 ...
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
Blog: http://tedorgwp.free.fr
WebSite: http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Maarten Bosteels <mb...@gmail.com>
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Mardi, 23 Juin 2009, 10h30mn 14s
Objet : Re: Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
OK for me to remove SingleSessionIohandler
Maarten
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>wrote:
> Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>
>> I would really like some comments on this one :)
>>
>>
>
> Commenting right now ;)
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on
SingleSessionIohandler
Posted by Maarten Bosteels <mb...@gmail.com>.
OK for me to remove SingleSessionIohandler
Maarten
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>wrote:
> Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>
>> I would really like some comments on this one :)
>>
>>
>
> Commenting right now ;)
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: Re : [jira] Updated: (DIRMINA-612) Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
> I would really like some comments on this one :)
>
Commenting right now ;)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org