You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/03/19 13:06:37 UTC
[Bug 1020] Changed - xpath boolean treats strings wrong: strings with length 0 are not considered to be false.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
*** shadow/1020 Mon Mar 19 02:19:01 2001
--- shadow/1020.tmp.3835 Mon Mar 19 04:06:37 2001
***************
*** 4,11 ****
| Bug #: 1020 Product: XalanJ2 |
| Status: NEW Version: 2.0.0 |
| Resolution: Platform: PC |
! | Severity: Critical OS/Version: Linux |
! | Priority: Component: org.apache.xpath |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Assigned To: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org |
| Reported By: jtl@schlund.de |
--- 4,11 ----
| Bug #: 1020 Product: XalanJ2 |
| Status: NEW Version: 2.0.0 |
| Resolution: Platform: PC |
! | Severity: Normal OS/Version: Linux |
! | Priority: High Component: org.apache.xpath |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Assigned To: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org |
| Reported By: jtl@schlund.de |
***************
*** 58,61 ****
*** FOO is not set.
*** BAR='b3'
! *** Note the BAR value in the second block.
--- 58,69 ----
*** FOO is not set.
*** BAR='b3'
! *** Note the BAR value in the second block.
!
! ------- Additional Comments From jtl@schlund.de 2001-03-19 04:06 -------
! Hmmmpf.... this may be actually true... (Shame on me)
! The $bar param instantiated is actually a RTF, not a string. Is it really true
! that a RTF is considered to be always true? Xalan1 didn't seem to think so, but
! saxon6.2.2 does actually.
! Can anybody with a bit of knowledge comment on this, please.
!