You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> on 2006/09/14 18:51:57 UTC
[VOTE] Approve the release of ServiceMix 3.0-incubating
The ServiceMix community voted on and approved to release
the 3.0-incubating version [1]. Pursuant to the Releases section of
the Incubation Policy and we would now like to request the
permission of the Incubator PMC to publish this release.
The release / download page is available at [2]:
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ServiceMix-3.0-M2-incubating-%28second-try%29-tf2251652.html
[2] http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/servicemix-30.html
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of ServiceMix 3.0-incubating
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 9/19/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Could incubator PMC members please take a look at this release ?
i've taken a quick look and the license issues look better now
> Or should I restart a vote ?
IMHO it would be cleaner to do so. it can be hard to tally and follow
VOTE threads when the proposal changes each time. it's usually best to
choose a slightly different subject name for a vote on an altered
proposal.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of ServiceMix 3.0-incubating
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
Could incubator PMC members please take a look at this release ?
Or should I restart a vote ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
>> i'd like to see these issues resolved
>>
> I have uploaded new binaries with the above problems fixed.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of ServiceMix 3.0-incubating
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> i'd like to see these issues resolved
>
>
I have uploaded new binaries with the above problems fixed.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of ServiceMix 3.0-incubating
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 9/14/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > OASIS and W3C licensed documents are contained in the source. IANAL
> > (this probably needs checking with legal) but they look ok to me. i
> > suspect that the W3C copyright license requires that the appropriate
> > note is placed in the NOTICE.
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/XMLSchema.dtd
> >
> > ,
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/XMLSchema.xsd
> >
> > and
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/datatypes.dtd
> >
> These are verbatim copies of the ones published by w3c.
> See http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.dtd,
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd and
> http://www.w3.org/2001/datatypes.dtd
guessed so
> I will try to follow the license I have just found at
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231
good
i think that we need to add a section to the notice but i'll check
with legal-discuss. the answer then probably needs to be added to the
release documentation on www.apache.org.
> > lack copyright notices. think that these documents should be
> > licensable under w3c copyright policy. is this right?
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-common/src/test/resources/wsn/xml.xsd
> >
> > worries me. it lacks a copyright header. was this developed at
> > apache...?
> >
> > ditto for
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/xml.xsd
> >
> These are the same files. Why are you worried about them ? I guess the
> same policy than for the three above applies,
> as it is a W3C document.
thought they were but needed to check. these documents lack copyright
notices. this may cause issues in some jurisdictions (but probably not
the US).
<snip>
> These files are templates and are processed to produce actual files.
guessed so
> They are meant to be processed and uses as a basis for users-code,
> I thought it was not a good idea to put copyrights on them, but ...
i agree that it is not a good idea to generate files with copyrights in them.
however, they are source code and where this is possible it is good to
have headers. if the templating language allows comments (which do not
end up in the generated document) then the best approach is to use
these. if this is not possible then it's probably best not to include
headers and instead add a README to the directory with the header and
indicating that these files are offered under the ASL.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of ServiceMix 3.0-incubating
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/servicemix-web/src/webapp/mktree.js
>
> worries me. its license does not appear to be suitable for
> redistribution.
It seems so. I'll see what I can do about that.
>
> OASIS and W3C licensed documents are contained in the source. IANAL
> (this probably needs checking with legal) but they look ok to me. i
> suspect that the W3C copyright license requires that the appropriate
> note is placed in the NOTICE.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/XMLSchema.dtd
>
> ,
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/XMLSchema.xsd
>
> and
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/datatypes.dtd
>
These are verbatim copies of the ones published by w3c.
See http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.dtd,
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd and
http://www.w3.org/2001/datatypes.dtd
I will try to follow the license I have just found at
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231
> lack copyright notices. think that these documents should be
> licensable under w3c copyright policy. is this right?
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-common/src/test/resources/wsn/xml.xsd
>
> worries me. it lacks a copyright header. was this developed at
> apache...?
>
> ditto for
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/xml.xsd
>
These are the same files. Why are you worried about them ? I guess the
same policy than for the three above applies,
as it is a W3C document.
>
> source lacking license headers:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/client/RemoteServiceMixClientTest.java
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/components/util/CopyTransformerTest.java
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/installation/AbstractManagementTest.java
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/messaging/TransactionsTest.java
>
I will fix these
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/tooling/servicemix-archetypes-itests/src/test/resources/archetype-pom.xml
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/tooling/servicemix-binding-component/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/main/java/MyBootstrap.java
>
> (also contains a typo 'Usefull')
> templates in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/tooling/servicemix-binding-component/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/main/java/
>
These files are templates and are processed to produce actual files.
They are meant to be processed and uses as a basis for users-code,
I thought it was not a good idea to put copyrights on them, but ...
Btw, thanks for the typo :)
>
> i'd like to see these issues resolved
>
> notes:
>
> the binary and source distributions unpack to directories with the
> same name. it's more convenient if the source distribution unpacks to
> a different directory (conventionally suffix the binary name with
> -src). the source distributions unpack to
> apache-servicemix-3.0-incubating/src.
Noted
Thanks for the feedback,
Guillaume
>
> - robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of ServiceMix 3.0-incubating
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 9/14/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
> The ServiceMix community voted on and approved to release
> the 3.0-incubating version [1]. Pursuant to the Releases section of
> the Incubation Policy and we would now like to request the
> permission of the Incubator PMC to publish this release.
> The release / download page is available at [2]:
>
> [1]
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ServiceMix-3.0-M2-incubating-%28second-try%29-tf2251652.html
> [2] http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/servicemix-30.html
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/servicemix-web/src/webapp/mktree.js
worries me. its license does not appear to be suitable for
redistribution.
OASIS and W3C licensed documents are contained in the source. IANAL
(this probably needs checking with legal) but they look ok to me. i
suspect that the W3C copyright license requires that the appropriate
note is placed in the NOTICE.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/XMLSchema.dtd
, http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/XMLSchema.xsd
and http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/2001/datatypes.dtd
lack copyright notices. think that these documents should be
licensable under w3c copyright policy. is this right?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-common/src/test/resources/wsn/xml.xsd
worries me. it lacks a copyright header. was this developed at
apache...?
ditto for http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-wsn2005/src/main/resources/org/apache/servicemix/wsn/xml.xsd
source lacking license headers:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/client/RemoteServiceMixClientTest.java
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/components/util/CopyTransformerTest.java
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/installation/AbstractManagementTest.java
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/messaging/TransactionsTest.java
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/tooling/servicemix-archetypes-itests/src/test/resources/archetype-pom.xml
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/tooling/servicemix-binding-component/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/main/java/MyBootstrap.java
(also contains a typo 'Usefull')
templates in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/tooling/servicemix-binding-component/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/main/java/
i'd like to see these issues resolved
notes:
the binary and source distributions unpack to directories with the
same name. it's more convenient if the source distribution unpacks to
a different directory (conventionally suffix the binary name with
-src). the source distributions unpack to
apache-servicemix-3.0-incubating/src.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org