You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Don Asper <Do...@sas.com> on 2015/10/20 16:21:08 UTC
org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
We're currently using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 but want to upgrade to 5.12.0. Our server.xml contains
<Resource type="org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory" name="sas/jms/EVQueueConnectionFactory" factory="org.apache.activemq.jndi.JNDIReferenceFactory" auth="Container" useEmbeddedBroker="false" maxConnections="10" brokerURL="tcp://rdcesx08007.race.sas.com:61616"/>
This works fine with ActiveMQ 5.7.0. But we can't find org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory in the 5.12.0 distribution. Has this class been deprecated or removed? If so, is there a recommended replacement for use in ActiveMQ 5.12.0?
Thanks!
Re: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
Glad that worked for you, I was just about to respond to tell you I was
actually right the first time with my original response but you already
figured it out :)
org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory actually extends
org.apache.activemq.jms.pool.PooledConnectionFactory and adds the
JNDIStorableInterface as you discovered. It's a bit confusing since they
are named the same thing.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Don Asper <Do...@sas.com> wrote:
> org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory
> works for me. It implements JNDIStorableInterface.
> org.apache.activemq.jms.pool.PooledConnectionFactory
> does not.
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Asper
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:00 AM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: RE: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory
> removed?
>
> This is not working for me. I'm getting
> javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: "Name ... is not bound in this
> Context". AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory is derived from
> org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory. It seems to be
> specialized to use JNDI whereas PooledConnectionFactory apparently is not.
> Are there other alternatives? Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Shannon [mailto:christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:56 AM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory
> removed?
>
> Oops, I believe you want to use the one thats part of the jms sub package.
> Try this one instead:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/jms/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.html
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > That class has been removed (as you've seen). Take a look at using this:
> > http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/pool/Pool
> > edConnectionFactory.html
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Don Asper <Do...@sas.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We're currently using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 but want to upgrade to 5.12.0.
> >> Our server.xml contains
> >>
> >> <Resource type="org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory"
> >> name="sas/jms/EVQueueConnectionFactory"
> >> factory="org.apache.activemq.jndi.JNDIReferenceFactory" auth="Container"
> >> useEmbeddedBroker="false" maxConnections="10" brokerURL="tcp://
> >> rdcesx08007.race.sas.com:61616"/>
> >>
> >> This works fine with ActiveMQ 5.7.0. But we can't find
> >> org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory in the 5.12.0
> >> distribution. Has this class been deprecated or removed? If so, is
> >> there a recommended replacement for use in ActiveMQ 5.12.0?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >
> >
>
RE: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
Posted by Don Asper <Do...@sas.com>.
org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory
works for me. It implements JNDIStorableInterface.
org.apache.activemq.jms.pool.PooledConnectionFactory
does not.
Thank you for your help!
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Asper
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:00 AM
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
This is not working for me. I'm getting javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: "Name ... is not bound in this Context". AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory is derived from org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory. It seems to be specialized to use JNDI whereas PooledConnectionFactory apparently is not. Are there other alternatives? Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Shannon [mailto:christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:56 AM
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
Oops, I believe you want to use the one thats part of the jms sub package.
Try this one instead:
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/jms/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.html
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> That class has been removed (as you've seen). Take a look at using this:
> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/pool/Pool
> edConnectionFactory.html
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Don Asper <Do...@sas.com> wrote:
>
>> We're currently using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 but want to upgrade to 5.12.0.
>> Our server.xml contains
>>
>> <Resource type="org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory"
>> name="sas/jms/EVQueueConnectionFactory"
>> factory="org.apache.activemq.jndi.JNDIReferenceFactory" auth="Container"
>> useEmbeddedBroker="false" maxConnections="10" brokerURL="tcp://
>> rdcesx08007.race.sas.com:61616"/>
>>
>> This works fine with ActiveMQ 5.7.0. But we can't find
>> org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory in the 5.12.0
>> distribution. Has this class been deprecated or removed? If so, is
>> there a recommended replacement for use in ActiveMQ 5.12.0?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
>
RE: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
Posted by Don Asper <Do...@sas.com>.
This is not working for me. I'm getting javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: "Name ... is not bound in this Context". AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory is derived from org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory. It seems to be specialized to use JNDI whereas PooledConnectionFactory apparently is not. Are there other alternatives? Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Shannon [mailto:christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:56 AM
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
Oops, I believe you want to use the one thats part of the jms sub package.
Try this one instead:
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/jms/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.html
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> That class has been removed (as you've seen). Take a look at using this:
> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/pool/Pool
> edConnectionFactory.html
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Don Asper <Do...@sas.com> wrote:
>
>> We're currently using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 but want to upgrade to 5.12.0.
>> Our server.xml contains
>>
>> <Resource type="org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory"
>> name="sas/jms/EVQueueConnectionFactory"
>> factory="org.apache.activemq.jndi.JNDIReferenceFactory" auth="Container"
>> useEmbeddedBroker="false" maxConnections="10" brokerURL="tcp://
>> rdcesx08007.race.sas.com:61616"/>
>>
>> This works fine with ActiveMQ 5.7.0. But we can't find
>> org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory in the 5.12.0
>> distribution. Has this class been deprecated or removed? If so, is
>> there a recommended replacement for use in ActiveMQ 5.12.0?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
>
Re: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
Oops, I believe you want to use the one thats part of the jms sub package.
Try this one instead:
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/jms/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.html
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> That class has been removed (as you've seen). Take a look at using this:
> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.html
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Don Asper <Do...@sas.com> wrote:
>
>> We're currently using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 but want to upgrade to 5.12.0. Our
>> server.xml contains
>>
>> <Resource type="org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory"
>> name="sas/jms/EVQueueConnectionFactory"
>> factory="org.apache.activemq.jndi.JNDIReferenceFactory" auth="Container"
>> useEmbeddedBroker="false" maxConnections="10" brokerURL="tcp://
>> rdcesx08007.race.sas.com:61616"/>
>>
>> This works fine with ActiveMQ 5.7.0. But we can't find
>> org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory in the 5.12.0
>> distribution. Has this class been deprecated or removed? If so, is there
>> a recommended replacement for use in ActiveMQ 5.12.0?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
>
Re: org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory removed?
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
That class has been removed (as you've seen). Take a look at using this:
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.html
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Don Asper <Do...@sas.com> wrote:
> We're currently using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 but want to upgrade to 5.12.0. Our
> server.xml contains
>
> <Resource type="org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory"
> name="sas/jms/EVQueueConnectionFactory"
> factory="org.apache.activemq.jndi.JNDIReferenceFactory" auth="Container"
> useEmbeddedBroker="false" maxConnections="10" brokerURL="tcp://
> rdcesx08007.race.sas.com:61616"/>
>
> This works fine with ActiveMQ 5.7.0. But we can't find
> org.apache.activemq.pool.AmqJNDIPooledConnectionFactory in the 5.12.0
> distribution. Has this class been deprecated or removed? If so, is there
> a recommended replacement for use in ActiveMQ 5.12.0?
>
> Thanks!
>