You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/07/30 18:08:02 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11292] - Possible improper namespace handling in the schema?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11292>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11292

Possible improper namespace handling in the schema?





------- Additional Comments From David_N_Bertoni@lotus.com  2002-07-30 16:08 -------
You didn't provide any text of any error messages, so I have no idea if this is 
a bug or not.  I ran these files against Xalan 1.3 and got the following output:

C:\temp\Xalan-1.3>Xalan http://www.radiosoft.com/XMLSchema/directional_pattern.x
ml http://www.radiosoft.com/XMLSchema/dirpat_to_pt2.xsl

Error  at (file http://www.radiosoft.com/XMLSchema/directional_pattern.xml, line
 4, column 116): Attribute 'IsArray' cannot appear in local element declarations


Error  at (file http://www.radiosoft.com/XMLSchema/directional_pattern.xml, line
 4, column 116): Attribute 'ArrrayType' cannot appear in local element declarati
ons

Error  at (file http://www.radiosoft.com/XMLSchema/directional_pattern.xml, line
 4, column 116): Attribute 'Inherits' cannot appear in global complexType declar
ations

Error  at (file http://www.radiosoft.com/XMLSchema/directional_pattern.xml, line
 4, column 116): Attribute 'type' cannot appear in local element declarations
RadioSoft ComStudy 2.0 .PT2 File. (c) Mountain Tower, Ltd. All Rights Reserved!
MODEL:   RSF TESTPAT2
GAIN:  14.9
FREQ:  476.2
RADIALS: 14

RADIAL VALUES
HORZ:      0   VERT:      0   FIELD:    900
HORZ:   4500   VERT:      0   FIELD:    400
HORZ:   9000   VERT:      0   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:  13500   VERT:      0   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:  18000   VERT:      0   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:  22500   VERT:      0   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:  27000   VERT:      0   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:  31500   VERT:      0   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:      0   VERT:   4500   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:      0   VERT:   9000   FIELD:   1000
HORZ:      0   VERT:  13500   FIELD:    700
HORZ:      0   VERT:  22500   FIELD:    800
HORZ:      0   VERT:  27000   FIELD:    300
HORZ:      0   VERT:  31500   FIELD:   1000

These validation errors are from Xerces 1.6, so I'm assuming they are problems 
fixed by Xerces 1.7, if you're not seeing them using 1.7.  Can you please 
provide more information?