You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@bookkeeper.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/08/20 16:01:51 UTC

[GitHub] jvrao commented on a change in pull request #1611: BP-35: 128 bits support

jvrao commented on a change in pull request #1611: BP-35: 128 bits support
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1611#discussion_r211317259
 
 

 ##########
 File path: site/bps/BP-35-128-bits-support.md
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+---
+title: "BP-34: 128 bits support"
+issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/603
+state: "Under Discussion"
+design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cu54dNSV2ZrdWCi40LcyX8NxXGRCW0609T_ewmK9BWM
+release: "4.9.0"
+---
+
+### Motivation
+
+BookKeeper coordinates with a metadata store to generate a cluster wide `ledgerId`.
+Currently this is a signed `64 bit` number (effectively 63 bits). This method works
+great because we have a centralized metadata store for coordinating the id generation.
+However this method may not scale as the cluster size and number of ledgers grow.
+
+[Universally unique identifier - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globally_unique_identifier)
 
 Review comment:
   That's my understanding too. So in that way, should we just keep calling it lid_usb? or something? naming it ```scope``` might make folks see things differently (mostly in the wrong way)

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services