You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Ersin Er (JIRA)" <di...@incubator.apache.org> on 2005/08/21 16:35:54 UTC
[jira] Created: (DIRLDAP-48) The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DIRLDAP-48
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-48
Project: Directory LDAP
Type: Improvement
Components: Common
Versions: 0.9.2, 0.9.3
Reporter: Ersin Er
It's better to hold a subtree base relative to the administration point as a Name rather than just a String. Similarly, type of the refinement is ExprNode and changing type of the subtree base will also enable us to parse it with DnParser as a subordinate parser.
This change should directly affect SubtreeSpecification interface, BaseSubtreeSpecification and SubtreeSpecificationModifier classes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (DIRLDAP-48) The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
Posted by "Alex Karasulu (JIRA)" <di...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-48?page=all ]
Alex Karasulu updated DIRLDAP-48:
---------------------------------
Fix Version: 0.9.2
> The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRLDAP-48
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-48
> Project: Directory LDAP
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Common
> Versions: 0.9.2, 0.9.3
> Reporter: Ersin Er
> Fix For: 0.9.2
>
> It's better to hold a subtree base relative to the administration point as a Name rather than just a String. Similarly, type of the refinement is ExprNode and changing type of the subtree base will also enable us to parse it with DnParser as a subordinate parser.
> This change should directly affect SubtreeSpecification interface, BaseSubtreeSpecification and SubtreeSpecificationModifier classes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (DIRSERVER-209) The type of the subtree base in the
SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
Posted by "Ersin Er (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-209?page=all ]
Ersin Er closed DIRSERVER-209:
------------------------------
Done.
> The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-209
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-209
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Type: Bug
> Components: ldap
> Versions: pre-1.0
> Reporter: Ersin Er
> Assignee: Alex Karasulu
> Fix For: pre-1.0
>
> It's better to hold a subtree base relative to the administration point as a Name rather than just a String. Similarly, type of the refinement is ExprNode and changing type of the subtree base will also enable us to parse it with DnParser as a subordinate parser.
> This change should directly affect SubtreeSpecification interface, BaseSubtreeSpecification and SubtreeSpecificationModifier classes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Assigned: (DIRLDAP-48) The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
Posted by "Alex Karasulu (JIRA)" <di...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-48?page=all ]
Alex Karasulu reassigned DIRLDAP-48:
------------------------------------
Assign To: Alex Karasulu
> The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRLDAP-48
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-48
> Project: Directory LDAP
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Common
> Versions: 0.9.2, 0.9.3
> Reporter: Ersin Er
> Assignee: Alex Karasulu
> Fix For: 0.9.2
>
> It's better to hold a subtree base relative to the administration point as a Name rather than just a String. Similarly, type of the refinement is ExprNode and changing type of the subtree base will also enable us to parse it with DnParser as a subordinate parser.
> This change should directly affect SubtreeSpecification interface, BaseSubtreeSpecification and SubtreeSpecificationModifier classes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Resolved: (DIRLDAP-48) The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
Posted by "Alex Karasulu (JIRA)" <di...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-48?page=all ]
Alex Karasulu resolved DIRLDAP-48:
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 234243 here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=234243&view=rev
> The type of the subtree base in the SubtreeSpecification bean should be Name instead String
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRLDAP-48
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-48
> Project: Directory LDAP
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Common
> Versions: 0.9.2, 0.9.3
> Reporter: Ersin Er
> Assignee: Alex Karasulu
> Fix For: 0.9.2
>
> It's better to hold a subtree base relative to the administration point as a Name rather than just a String. Similarly, type of the refinement is ExprNode and changing type of the subtree base will also enable us to parse it with DnParser as a subordinate parser.
> This change should directly affect SubtreeSpecification interface, BaseSubtreeSpecification and SubtreeSpecificationModifier classes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira