You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2008/11/10 09:31:57 UTC

Re: [jira] Updated: (CAY-1090) Vertical inheritance

On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Ari Maniatis (JIRA) wrote:

>
> Ari Maniatis updated CAY-1090:
> ------------------------------
>
>    Fix Version/s:     (was: Short term future)
>                   3.0M5
>         Assignee: Andrus Adamchik  (was: Ari Maniatis)

That's too optimistic (i.e. not gonna happen) .I think we should keep  
3.0 (without specific milestone) as a Fix Version for most things, and  
change it to a next milestone once the issue is closed.

Andrus


Re: [jira] Updated: (CAY-1090) Vertical inheritance

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Makes sense.

Andrus

On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

>
> On 10/11/2008, at 7:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> That's too optimistic (i.e. not gonna happen) .I think we should  
>> keep 3.0 (without specific milestone) as a Fix Version for most  
>> things, and change it to a next milestone once the issue is closed.
>
> I wanted to do some triaging though to get us out of this rut with  
> 'M5 is just around the corner'. So I've created these versions:
>
> * 1.2.5 and 2.0.5 to keep anything we are targeting for a bug fix in  
> those branches. Maybe that will be never in which case we delete the  
> versions after 3.0 comes out. But it allowed me to mark 2.0 branch  
> and 1.2 branch as being 'released' to get it out of the road map.
>
> * 3.0M1 - 3.0M4
>
> * 3.0M5. I've only assigned a couple of tasks to that which I  
> thought people were working on. I moved inheritance away to 3.0 just  
> now so only CAY-1077 and CAY-1058 are there now. In theory once they  
> are done we release M5. Is there anything else which needs to go  
> into the M5 list?
>
> * short term future: things which may or may not get done for 3.0.  
> There are some things in here which should be moved to 3.0 if they  
> definitely need to be done for that. But everyone needs to help out  
> with those tasks they own. For instance any API changes which need  
> to go into 3.0. Query generification anyone?
>
> * undefined future. Wish list ideas which no one is really working  
> on any time soon.
>
>
> The goal is to get a better picture of what is left for M5 and for  
> 3.0. Then we can answer the question "will there be M6 or just "3.0  
> beta 1"?
>
>
> Ari
>
>
>
> -------------------------->
> ish
> http://www.ish.com.au
> Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>


Re: [jira] Updated: (CAY-1090) Vertical inheritance

Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@ish.com.au>.
On 10/11/2008, at 7:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> That's too optimistic (i.e. not gonna happen) .I think we should  
> keep 3.0 (without specific milestone) as a Fix Version for most  
> things, and change it to a next milestone once the issue is closed.

I wanted to do some triaging though to get us out of this rut with 'M5  
is just around the corner'. So I've created these versions:

* 1.2.5 and 2.0.5 to keep anything we are targeting for a bug fix in  
those branches. Maybe that will be never in which case we delete the  
versions after 3.0 comes out. But it allowed me to mark 2.0 branch and  
1.2 branch as being 'released' to get it out of the road map.

* 3.0M1 - 3.0M4

* 3.0M5. I've only assigned a couple of tasks to that which I thought  
people were working on. I moved inheritance away to 3.0 just now so  
only CAY-1077 and CAY-1058 are there now. In theory once they are done  
we release M5. Is there anything else which needs to go into the M5  
list?

* short term future: things which may or may not get done for 3.0.  
There are some things in here which should be moved to 3.0 if they  
definitely need to be done for that. But everyone needs to help out  
with those tasks they own. For instance any API changes which need to  
go into 3.0. Query generification anyone?

* undefined future. Wish list ideas which no one is really working on  
any time soon.


The goal is to get a better picture of what is left for M5 and for  
3.0. Then we can answer the question "will there be M6 or just "3.0  
beta 1"?


Ari



-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A