You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/11/30 20:02:20 UTC
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2608) JACC 1.1 support (jsr-115 MR4)
JACC 1.1 support (jsr-115 MR4)
------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-2608
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2608
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: security, specs
Affects Versions: 2.0
Reporter: David Jencks
Assigned To: David Jencks
Fix For: 2.0
we need to update the jacc specs to support 1.1/MR4. From my reading of the specs so far the only changes in the spec classes is to support http extension methods and support http method exclusion lists.
I'm going to start with a name of geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec, leaving out the no longer appropriate "j2ee". If people want a "jee" in there, we can change it.
I'm also starting with a version of 1.1-SNAPSHOT and hope jason or someone will correct me if I'm wrong on that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2608) JACC 1.1 support (jsr-115 MR4)
Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2608?page=comments#action_12454730 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2608:
----------------------------------------
Spec implementation comitted rev 481038.
I'll leave this open until it's used in g 2.0 and we are sure about the name/version.
> JACC 1.1 support (jsr-115 MR4)
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2608
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2608
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: security, specs
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Assigned To: David Jencks
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> we need to update the jacc specs to support 1.1/MR4. From my reading of the specs so far the only changes in the spec classes is to support http extension methods and support http method exclusion lists.
> I'm going to start with a name of geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec, leaving out the no longer appropriate "j2ee". If people want a "jee" in there, we can change it.
> I'm also starting with a version of 1.1-SNAPSHOT and hope jason or someone will correct me if I'm wrong on that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2608) JACC 1.1 support (jsr-115 MR4)
Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2608?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2608.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Earlier I changed the version to 1.0-SNAPSHOT
geronimo trunk updated to use this in rev 481185
openejb 2.3 updated to use this in rev 481186
We can discuss the name in another jira or reopen this one.
> JACC 1.1 support (jsr-115 MR4)
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2608
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2608
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: specs, security
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Assigned To: David Jencks
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> we need to update the jacc specs to support 1.1/MR4. From my reading of the specs so far the only changes in the spec classes is to support http extension methods and support http method exclusion lists.
> I'm going to start with a name of geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec, leaving out the no longer appropriate "j2ee". If people want a "jee" in there, we can change it.
> I'm also starting with a version of 1.1-SNAPSHOT and hope jason or someone will correct me if I'm wrong on that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira