You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@archiva.apache.org by Terence Kent <te...@gmail.com> on 2018/10/19 00:08:52 UTC
Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Hello,
In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's had a small
following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from time to
time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for Archiva.
We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the decision of
dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository manager, or
re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and modernize the
image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion helm chart to
make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making our image
your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think it's
reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container orchestration
platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd be quite
happy hand it over.
Here's the project links for reference:
- https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
- https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
Let me know,
Terence
Re: Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Hi Terence
That would be awesome to have you participating to the project!
Do not hesitate with pull requests!
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 15:18, Martin Stockhammer <ma...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Terence,
>
> great! Start with small contributions to get an understanding how the
> process works. For getting bigger changes into the project the dev mailing
> list is the best place to start discussing about the details.
>
> Regards
>
> Martin
>
> Am 22. Oktober 2018 21:34:24 MESZ schrieb Terence Kent <
> terencekent@gmail.com>:
> >Martin,
> >
> >Sounds good! I've got to pickup another project, but as soon as I have
> >some
> >time I'll pickup the Archiva source and take a look at where the docker
> >image would fit. To be honest, I probably should have just done that to
> >begin with. There are a few minor things I've been wanting to
> >change/fix in
> >there for years, I've just been avoiding the effort of getting familiar
> >with the project source :-). If I just bite the bullet get familiar
> >with
> >the source, I can send over a few different pull requests.
> >
> >Best,
> >Terence
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:13 AM Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Terence,
> >>
> >> thank you for help.
> >> As you already know, resources are very limited in this project. So,
> >I
> >> have to focus on the things that are manageable.
> >> Code contribution is very appreciated, so if you have any changes you
> >like
> >> to get into the project, feel free to create pull
> >> requests. If you like, you can even add the complete
> >docker/kubernetes
> >> part as pull request.
> >> If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >>
> >> Am Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018, 01:30:41 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> >> > Hey Martin,
> >> >
> >> > Feel free to add a link to our image and chart on the Archiva
> >webpage.
> >> > Also, I threw together a v2-snapshot
> >> > <https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva/tree/v2-snapshot>
> >> branch/tag
> >> > of the image that is built using the most recent 2.2.4 snapshot.
> >All of
> >> our
> >> > image tests pass using the current 2.2.4-SNAPSHOT build, as you
> >would
> >> > expect.
> >> >
> >> > Looking ahead, whenever you dust off this project to finish out
> >2.2.4 or
> >> > jump to version 3, I'd really like to see a docker image brought
> >into the
> >> > project directly. Maintaining the image code separately from the
> >project
> >> > isn't the greatest idea and since you already have a docker image
> >for
> >> > testing, I'm sure it's something you've considered. If we're
> >available
> >> the
> >> > next time there's some focus on this project, we'll see if we can
> >help
> >> out
> >> > with that part. We've learned several lessons about running Archiva
> >in a
> >> > container over the past few years and we'd love to make some small
> >> changes
> >> > in the source project to make life easier :-).
> >> >
> >> > Oh, and it'd sure be nice to have an official Kubernetes helm chart
> >once
> >> > there is an offical docker image. I'm confident that a lot more
> >people
> >> > would use Archiva if was available there.
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> > Terence
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM Martin <ma...@apache.org>
> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Terence,
> >> > >
> >> > > thank you for the information. Great work and great to hear, that
> >you
> >> > > decided to keep archiva, despite the
> >> > > slow development.
> >> > > I would like to add the link to our archiva web page if you don't
> >mind.
> >> > > We are using docker images for our integration tests on the
> >jenkins
> >> > > server, but without kubernetes, maybe I
> >> > > can find some configuration on your project that may be useful
> >for
> >> these.
> >> > >
> >> > > Our current snapshot version for the stable 2.2 release branch
> >> > > (2.2.4-SNAPSHOT) contains some fixes and
> >> > > there are not very much changes compared to the 2.2.3 version, so
> >I
> >> would
> >> > > consider it as stable.
> >> > > If you like, you can use a current snapshot version in your
> >docker
> >> image
> >> > > or provide an option for using it.
> >> > > The zip files can be found at:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >
> https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/snapshots/org/apache/archiva/archiva-jetty/2.2.4-SNAPSHOT/
> >> > > But it's still a snapshot version so, if there is development
> >going
> >> on, it
> >> > > may be broken every now and then, so it may be not a
> >> > > good idea, if the file is downloaded dynamically during container
> >> > > start/build.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > >
> >> > > Martin
> >> > >
> >> > > Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018, 02:08:52 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> >> > > > Hello,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's
> >had a
> >> small
> >> > > > following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from
> >time
> >> to
> >> > > > time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for
> >> Archiva.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the
> >decision of
> >> > > > dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository
> >manager,
> >> or
> >> > > > re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and
> >modernize
> >> the
> >> > > > image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion
> >helm
> >> chart to
> >> > > > make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making
> >our
> >> image
> >> > > > your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think
> >it's
> >> > > > reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
> >> > > > containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container
> >> orchestration
> >> > > > platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd
> >be
> >> quite
> >> > > > happy hand it over.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Here's the project links for reference:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
> >> > > > -
> >> https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Let me know,
> >> > > > Terence
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> This message was sent from mobile phone.
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Posted by Martin Stockhammer <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi Terence,
great! Start with small contributions to get an understanding how the process works. For getting bigger changes into the project the dev mailing list is the best place to start discussing about the details.
Regards
Martin
Am 22. Oktober 2018 21:34:24 MESZ schrieb Terence Kent <te...@gmail.com>:
>Martin,
>
>Sounds good! I've got to pickup another project, but as soon as I have
>some
>time I'll pickup the Archiva source and take a look at where the docker
>image would fit. To be honest, I probably should have just done that to
>begin with. There are a few minor things I've been wanting to
>change/fix in
>there for years, I've just been avoiding the effort of getting familiar
>with the project source :-). If I just bite the bullet get familiar
>with
>the source, I can send over a few different pull requests.
>
>Best,
>Terence
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:13 AM Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Terence,
>>
>> thank you for help.
>> As you already know, resources are very limited in this project. So,
>I
>> have to focus on the things that are manageable.
>> Code contribution is very appreciated, so if you have any changes you
>like
>> to get into the project, feel free to create pull
>> requests. If you like, you can even add the complete
>docker/kubernetes
>> part as pull request.
>> If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> Am Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018, 01:30:41 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
>> > Hey Martin,
>> >
>> > Feel free to add a link to our image and chart on the Archiva
>webpage.
>> > Also, I threw together a v2-snapshot
>> > <https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva/tree/v2-snapshot>
>> branch/tag
>> > of the image that is built using the most recent 2.2.4 snapshot.
>All of
>> our
>> > image tests pass using the current 2.2.4-SNAPSHOT build, as you
>would
>> > expect.
>> >
>> > Looking ahead, whenever you dust off this project to finish out
>2.2.4 or
>> > jump to version 3, I'd really like to see a docker image brought
>into the
>> > project directly. Maintaining the image code separately from the
>project
>> > isn't the greatest idea and since you already have a docker image
>for
>> > testing, I'm sure it's something you've considered. If we're
>available
>> the
>> > next time there's some focus on this project, we'll see if we can
>help
>> out
>> > with that part. We've learned several lessons about running Archiva
>in a
>> > container over the past few years and we'd love to make some small
>> changes
>> > in the source project to make life easier :-).
>> >
>> > Oh, and it'd sure be nice to have an official Kubernetes helm chart
>once
>> > there is an offical docker image. I'm confident that a lot more
>people
>> > would use Archiva if was available there.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Terence
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM Martin <ma...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Terence,
>> > >
>> > > thank you for the information. Great work and great to hear, that
>you
>> > > decided to keep archiva, despite the
>> > > slow development.
>> > > I would like to add the link to our archiva web page if you don't
>mind.
>> > > We are using docker images for our integration tests on the
>jenkins
>> > > server, but without kubernetes, maybe I
>> > > can find some configuration on your project that may be useful
>for
>> these.
>> > >
>> > > Our current snapshot version for the stable 2.2 release branch
>> > > (2.2.4-SNAPSHOT) contains some fixes and
>> > > there are not very much changes compared to the 2.2.3 version, so
>I
>> would
>> > > consider it as stable.
>> > > If you like, you can use a current snapshot version in your
>docker
>> image
>> > > or provide an option for using it.
>> > > The zip files can be found at:
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/snapshots/org/apache/archiva/archiva-jetty/2.2.4-SNAPSHOT/
>> > > But it's still a snapshot version so, if there is development
>going
>> on, it
>> > > may be broken every now and then, so it may be not a
>> > > good idea, if the file is downloaded dynamically during container
>> > > start/build.
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > >
>> > > Martin
>> > >
>> > > Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018, 02:08:52 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
>> > > > Hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's
>had a
>> small
>> > > > following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from
>time
>> to
>> > > > time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for
>> Archiva.
>> > > >
>> > > > We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the
>decision of
>> > > > dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository
>manager,
>> or
>> > > > re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and
>modernize
>> the
>> > > > image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion
>helm
>> chart to
>> > > > make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
>> > > >
>> > > > I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making
>our
>> image
>> > > > your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think
>it's
>> > > > reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
>> > > > containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container
>> orchestration
>> > > > platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd
>be
>> quite
>> > > > happy hand it over.
>> > > >
>> > > > Here's the project links for reference:
>> > > >
>> > > > - https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
>> > > > -
>> https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
>> > > >
>> > > > Let me know,
>> > > > Terence
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
--
This message was sent from mobile phone.
Re: Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Posted by Terence Kent <te...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
Sounds good! I've got to pickup another project, but as soon as I have some
time I'll pickup the Archiva source and take a look at where the docker
image would fit. To be honest, I probably should have just done that to
begin with. There are a few minor things I've been wanting to change/fix in
there for years, I've just been avoiding the effort of getting familiar
with the project source :-). If I just bite the bullet get familiar with
the source, I can send over a few different pull requests.
Best,
Terence
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:13 AM Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Terence,
>
> thank you for help.
> As you already know, resources are very limited in this project. So, I
> have to focus on the things that are manageable.
> Code contribution is very appreciated, so if you have any changes you like
> to get into the project, feel free to create pull
> requests. If you like, you can even add the complete docker/kubernetes
> part as pull request.
> If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
>
> Regards
>
> Martin
>
>
> Am Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018, 01:30:41 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> > Hey Martin,
> >
> > Feel free to add a link to our image and chart on the Archiva webpage.
> > Also, I threw together a v2-snapshot
> > <https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva/tree/v2-snapshot>
> branch/tag
> > of the image that is built using the most recent 2.2.4 snapshot. All of
> our
> > image tests pass using the current 2.2.4-SNAPSHOT build, as you would
> > expect.
> >
> > Looking ahead, whenever you dust off this project to finish out 2.2.4 or
> > jump to version 3, I'd really like to see a docker image brought into the
> > project directly. Maintaining the image code separately from the project
> > isn't the greatest idea and since you already have a docker image for
> > testing, I'm sure it's something you've considered. If we're available
> the
> > next time there's some focus on this project, we'll see if we can help
> out
> > with that part. We've learned several lessons about running Archiva in a
> > container over the past few years and we'd love to make some small
> changes
> > in the source project to make life easier :-).
> >
> > Oh, and it'd sure be nice to have an official Kubernetes helm chart once
> > there is an offical docker image. I'm confident that a lot more people
> > would use Archiva if was available there.
> >
> > Best,
> > Terence
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Terence,
> > >
> > > thank you for the information. Great work and great to hear, that you
> > > decided to keep archiva, despite the
> > > slow development.
> > > I would like to add the link to our archiva web page if you don't mind.
> > > We are using docker images for our integration tests on the jenkins
> > > server, but without kubernetes, maybe I
> > > can find some configuration on your project that may be useful for
> these.
> > >
> > > Our current snapshot version for the stable 2.2 release branch
> > > (2.2.4-SNAPSHOT) contains some fixes and
> > > there are not very much changes compared to the 2.2.3 version, so I
> would
> > > consider it as stable.
> > > If you like, you can use a current snapshot version in your docker
> image
> > > or provide an option for using it.
> > > The zip files can be found at:
> > >
> > >
> https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/snapshots/org/apache/archiva/archiva-jetty/2.2.4-SNAPSHOT/
> > > But it's still a snapshot version so, if there is development going
> on, it
> > > may be broken every now and then, so it may be not a
> > > good idea, if the file is downloaded dynamically during container
> > > start/build.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018, 02:08:52 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's had a
> small
> > > > following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from time
> to
> > > > time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for
> Archiva.
> > > >
> > > > We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the decision of
> > > > dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository manager,
> or
> > > > re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and modernize
> the
> > > > image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion helm
> chart to
> > > > make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
> > > >
> > > > I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making our
> image
> > > > your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think it's
> > > > reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
> > > > containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container
> orchestration
> > > > platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd be
> quite
> > > > happy hand it over.
> > > >
> > > > Here's the project links for reference:
> > > >
> > > > - https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
> > > > -
> https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
> > > >
> > > > Let me know,
> > > > Terence
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Re: Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Posted by Martin <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi Terence,
thank you for help.
As you already know, resources are very limited in this project. So, I have to focus on the things that are manageable.
Code contribution is very appreciated, so if you have any changes you like to get into the project, feel free to create pull
requests. If you like, you can even add the complete docker/kubernetes part as pull request.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Regards
Martin
Am Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018, 01:30:41 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> Hey Martin,
>
> Feel free to add a link to our image and chart on the Archiva webpage.
> Also, I threw together a v2-snapshot
> <https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva/tree/v2-snapshot> branch/tag
> of the image that is built using the most recent 2.2.4 snapshot. All of our
> image tests pass using the current 2.2.4-SNAPSHOT build, as you would
> expect.
>
> Looking ahead, whenever you dust off this project to finish out 2.2.4 or
> jump to version 3, I'd really like to see a docker image brought into the
> project directly. Maintaining the image code separately from the project
> isn't the greatest idea and since you already have a docker image for
> testing, I'm sure it's something you've considered. If we're available the
> next time there's some focus on this project, we'll see if we can help out
> with that part. We've learned several lessons about running Archiva in a
> container over the past few years and we'd love to make some small changes
> in the source project to make life easier :-).
>
> Oh, and it'd sure be nice to have an official Kubernetes helm chart once
> there is an offical docker image. I'm confident that a lot more people
> would use Archiva if was available there.
>
> Best,
> Terence
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Terence,
> >
> > thank you for the information. Great work and great to hear, that you
> > decided to keep archiva, despite the
> > slow development.
> > I would like to add the link to our archiva web page if you don't mind.
> > We are using docker images for our integration tests on the jenkins
> > server, but without kubernetes, maybe I
> > can find some configuration on your project that may be useful for these.
> >
> > Our current snapshot version for the stable 2.2 release branch
> > (2.2.4-SNAPSHOT) contains some fixes and
> > there are not very much changes compared to the 2.2.3 version, so I would
> > consider it as stable.
> > If you like, you can use a current snapshot version in your docker image
> > or provide an option for using it.
> > The zip files can be found at:
> >
> > https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/snapshots/org/apache/archiva/archiva-jetty/2.2.4-SNAPSHOT/
> > But it's still a snapshot version so, if there is development going on, it
> > may be broken every now and then, so it may be not a
> > good idea, if the file is downloaded dynamically during container
> > start/build.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018, 02:08:52 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's had a small
> > > following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from time to
> > > time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for Archiva.
> > >
> > > We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the decision of
> > > dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository manager, or
> > > re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and modernize the
> > > image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion helm chart to
> > > make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
> > >
> > > I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making our image
> > > your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think it's
> > > reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
> > > containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container orchestration
> > > platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd be quite
> > > happy hand it over.
> > >
> > > Here's the project links for reference:
> > >
> > > - https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
> > > - https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
> > >
> > > Let me know,
> > > Terence
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Posted by Terence Kent <te...@gmail.com>.
Hey Martin,
Feel free to add a link to our image and chart on the Archiva webpage.
Also, I threw together a v2-snapshot
<https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva/tree/v2-snapshot> branch/tag
of the image that is built using the most recent 2.2.4 snapshot. All of our
image tests pass using the current 2.2.4-SNAPSHOT build, as you would
expect.
Looking ahead, whenever you dust off this project to finish out 2.2.4 or
jump to version 3, I'd really like to see a docker image brought into the
project directly. Maintaining the image code separately from the project
isn't the greatest idea and since you already have a docker image for
testing, I'm sure it's something you've considered. If we're available the
next time there's some focus on this project, we'll see if we can help out
with that part. We've learned several lessons about running Archiva in a
container over the past few years and we'd love to make some small changes
in the source project to make life easier :-).
Oh, and it'd sure be nice to have an official Kubernetes helm chart once
there is an offical docker image. I'm confident that a lot more people
would use Archiva if was available there.
Best,
Terence
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM Martin <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Terence,
>
> thank you for the information. Great work and great to hear, that you
> decided to keep archiva, despite the
> slow development.
> I would like to add the link to our archiva web page if you don't mind.
> We are using docker images for our integration tests on the jenkins
> server, but without kubernetes, maybe I
> can find some configuration on your project that may be useful for these.
>
> Our current snapshot version for the stable 2.2 release branch
> (2.2.4-SNAPSHOT) contains some fixes and
> there are not very much changes compared to the 2.2.3 version, so I would
> consider it as stable.
> If you like, you can use a current snapshot version in your docker image
> or provide an option for using it.
> The zip files can be found at:
>
> https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/snapshots/org/apache/archiva/archiva-jetty/2.2.4-SNAPSHOT/
> But it's still a snapshot version so, if there is development going on, it
> may be broken every now and then, so it may be not a
> good idea, if the file is downloaded dynamically during container
> start/build.
>
> Regards
>
> Martin
>
> Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018, 02:08:52 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's had a small
> > following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from time to
> > time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for Archiva.
> >
> > We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the decision of
> > dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository manager, or
> > re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and modernize the
> > image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion helm chart to
> > make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
> >
> > I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making our image
> > your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think it's
> > reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
> > containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container orchestration
> > platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd be quite
> > happy hand it over.
> >
> > Here's the project links for reference:
> >
> > - https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
> > - https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
> >
> > Let me know,
> > Terence
> >
>
>
>
Re: Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Posted by Martin <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi Terence,
thank you for the information. Great work and great to hear, that you decided to keep archiva, despite the
slow development.
I would like to add the link to our archiva web page if you don't mind.
We are using docker images for our integration tests on the jenkins server, but without kubernetes, maybe I
can find some configuration on your project that may be useful for these.
Our current snapshot version for the stable 2.2 release branch (2.2.4-SNAPSHOT) contains some fixes and
there are not very much changes compared to the 2.2.3 version, so I would consider it as stable.
If you like, you can use a current snapshot version in your docker image or provide an option for using it.
The zip files can be found at:
https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/snapshots/org/apache/archiva/archiva-jetty/2.2.4-SNAPSHOT/
But it's still a snapshot version so, if there is development going on, it may be broken every now and then, so it may be not a
good idea, if the file is downloaded dynamically during container start/build.
Regards
Martin
Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018, 02:08:52 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> Hello,
>
> In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's had a small
> following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from time to
> time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for Archiva.
>
> We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the decision of
> dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository manager, or
> re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and modernize the
> image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion helm chart to
> make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
>
> I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making our image
> your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think it's
> reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
> containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container orchestration
> platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd be quite
> happy hand it over.
>
> Here's the project links for reference:
>
> - https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
> - https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
>
> Let me know,
> Terence
>
Re: Interested in a Docker Image & Kubernetes Chart?
Posted by Martin <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi Terence,
thank you for the information. Great work and great to hear, that you decided to keep archiva, despite the
slow development.
I would like to add the link to our archiva web page if you don't mind.
We are using docker images for our integration tests on the jenkins server, but without kubernetes, maybe I
can find some configuration on your project that may be useful for these.
Our current snapshot version for the stable 2.2 release branch (2.2.4-SNAPSHOT) contains some fixes and
there are not very much changes compared to the 2.2.3 version, so I would consider it as stable.
If you like, you can use a current snapshot version in your docker image or provide an option for using it.
The zip files can be found at:
https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/snapshots/org/apache/archiva/archiva-jetty/2.2.4-SNAPSHOT/
But it's still a snapshot version so, if there is development going on, it may be broken every now and then, so it may be not a
good idea, if the file is downloaded dynamically during container start/build.
Regards
Martin
Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018, 02:08:52 CEST schrieb Terence Kent:
> Hello,
>
> In early 2015, we made our Archiva docker image public. It's had a small
> following on github/dockerhub and we field questions on it from time to
> time. As best we can tell, it's the de-facto docker image for Archiva.
>
> We recently moved to Kubernetes and were faced with the decision of
> dropping the archiva image and moving to another repository manager, or
> re-upping and modernizing the image. We chose to re-up and modernize the
> image and we now have a "version 2" image with an companion helm chart to
> make it easy to run in Kubernetes.
>
> I wanted to reach out to see if you had any interest in making our image
> your official one and pulling it the Archiva source. I think it's
> reasonable to assume new Archiva deployments are likely to be
> containerized, and Kubernetes is the most popular container orchestration
> platform. If our small image and chart can save you time, we'd be quite
> happy hand it over.
>
> Here's the project links for reference:
>
> - https://github.com/xetus-oss/docker-archiva
> - https://github.com/xetus-oss/helm-charts/tree/master/xetusoss-archiva
>
> Let me know,
> Terence
>