You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Neil Conway <nr...@cs.berkeley.edu> on 2009/09/15 21:12:12 UTC
branches/1.3.x: broken build (apr_md5.h)
I get the following when I try to build branches/1.3.x (r815439) on OSX 10.6:
/bin/sh /Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/libtool --silent
--mode=compile gcc -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDARWIN
-DSIGPROCMASK_SETS_THREAD_MASK -no-cpp-precomp -I./include
-I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include/arch/unix
-I./include/arch/unix
-I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include/arch/unix
-I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include -o
locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo -c locks/unix/proc_mutex.c && touch
locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo
locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:21:41: error: apr_md5.h: No such file or directory
locks/unix/proc_mutex.c: In function 'proc_mutex_posix_create':
locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: 'APR_MD5_DIGESTSIZE' undeclared
(first use in this function)
locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only once
locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo] Error 1
The culprit seems like r813589:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c?r1=813589&r2=813588&pathrev=813589
Presumably a build dependency on apr_md5.h makes more sense in trunk,
since apr and apr-util have been unified. Presumably it isn't
intentional to have apr-util be a build dependency of apr for the
1.3.x branch, right?
Neil
Re: branches/1.3.x: broken build (apr_md5.h)
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Neil Conway wrote:
> I get the following when I try to build branches/1.3.x (r815439) on OSX 10.6:
>
> /bin/sh /Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/libtool --silent
> --mode=compile gcc -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDARWIN
> -DSIGPROCMASK_SETS_THREAD_MASK -no-cpp-precomp -I./include
> -I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include/arch/unix
> -I./include/arch/unix
> -I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include/arch/unix
> -I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include -o
> locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo -c locks/unix/proc_mutex.c && touch
> locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo
> locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:21:41: error: apr_md5.h: No such file or directory
> locks/unix/proc_mutex.c: In function 'proc_mutex_posix_create':
> locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: 'APR_MD5_DIGESTSIZE' undeclared
> (first use in this function)
> locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once
> locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[1]: *** [locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo] Error 1
>
> The culprit seems like r813589:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c?r1=813589&r2=813588&pathrev=813589
>
> Presumably a build dependency on apr_md5.h makes more sense in trunk,
> since apr and apr-util have been unified. Presumably it isn't
> intentional to have apr-util be a build dependency of apr for the
> 1.3.x branch, right?
Certainly not :)
Re: branches/1.3.x: broken build (apr_md5.h)
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 09/15/2009 09:24 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Neil Conway <nr...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>> I get the following when I try to build branches/1.3.x (r815439) on OSX
>> 10.6:
>>
>
> you don't need OS X 1.6 to hit that
Yeah, apr shouldn't depend on apr-util. I guess this needs to be reverted
in 1.3.x and 1.4.x.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: branches/1.3.x: broken build (apr_md5.h)
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Neil Conway <nr...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I get the following when I try to build branches/1.3.x (r815439) on OSX
> 10.6:
>
you don't need OS X 1.6 to hit that
gosh :(