You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com> on 2009/10/17 00:32:10 UTC
Re: [jira] Updated: (OWB-143) Decorator matching looks for all bean
qualifiers in the list of delegate qualifiers
Hey Joe,
Thanks. Just one point, we are not using Sun style check style.
Instead of
XXX{
}
we are using
XXX
{
}
I am using attached code formatter in eclipse environment
Thanks again;
--Gurkan
2009/10/16 Joe Bergmark (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
>
> Joe Bergmark updated OWB-143:
> -----------------------------
>
> Attachment: OWB-143.txt
>
> A patch for the matching issue. It does not address the TODO with
> parameterized types however. I need a little more time to investigate that.
>
> I also re-factored the method a little bit, removing the boolean flags and
> some of the nesting. For one of the flag conditions I had to pull the inner
> loop out into a helper method. Please let me know if you prefer the old
> format, or would prefer that helper method to be elsewhere.
>
> > Decorator matching looks for all bean qualifiers in the list of delegate
> qualifiers
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: OWB-143
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-143
> > Project: OpenWebBeans
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: Interceptor and Decorators
> > Reporter: Joe Bergmark
> > Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu
> > Fix For: M4
> >
> > Attachments: OWB-143.txt
> >
> >
> > When attempting to match the decorator to a bean, the implementation
> appears to look for a match for all of the bean qualifiers in the delegate
> qualifier. For example if there was a bean annotated with @Named and
> @RequestScope that implements InterfaceA, the delegate injection point right
> now would need to look like:
> > @Delegate @Default @Any @Named InterfaceA a;
> > In order for it to match.
> > Currently it does not match parameterized types either.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com