You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/07/09 20:48:14 UTC
[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1737) Always use bulk-copy when merging
stored fields and term vectors
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1737:
---------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
Clearing 2.9 fix version.
> Always use bulk-copy when merging stored fields and term vectors
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1737
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
>
> Lucene has nice optimizations in place during merging of stored fields
> (LUCENE-1043) and term vectors (LUCENE-1120) whereby the bytes are
> bulk copied to the new segmetn. This is much faster than decoding &
> rewriting one document at a time.
> However the optimization is rather brittle: it relies on the mapping
> of field name to number to be the same ("congruent") for the segment
> being merged.
> Unfortunately, the field mapping will be congruent only if the app
> adds the same fields in precisely the same order to each document.
> I think we should fix IndexWriter to assign the same field number for
> a given field that has been assigned in the past. Ie, when writing a
> new segment, we pre-seed the field numbers based on past segments.
> All other aspects of FieldInfo would remain fully dynamic.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org