You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by "Stéphane Alnet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/05/01 15:31:48 UTC
[jira] [Created] (COUCHDB-1475) _users design documents access
Stéphane Alnet created COUCHDB-1475:
---------------------------------------
Summary: _users design documents access
Key: COUCHDB-1475
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1475
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Question
Components: Database Core
Affects Versions: 1.2
Environment: Debian/testing
Reporter: Stéphane Alnet
Priority: Minor
Sorry I'm coming in late on this topic, I found this while testing my existing code against 1.2.0.
The comments for commit e5503ffef957dc5e8784c7223e318738ae79b6df indicate for `after_doc_read`:
If the doc is a design doc and the userCtx doesn't identify
an admin or db-admin:
-> 403 // Forbidden
This breaks the (previously working) case where access to the _users database is restricted using a "members" security property, and authorized users could use a couchapp found in the _users database to manager user records.
(These power-users would have, say, "user_manager_ro" and "user_manager_rw" roles assigned to them, with the ro/rw aspect handled by a specific validate_doc_udpate() which would be part of the couchapp; the roles were entered in the _users' database members.roles security field.)
Pointing me back to a discussion explaining the background for this new behavior would be sufficient, if it is effectively a desirable side-effect and things will remain as they are. Otherwise it seems a finer-grained logic for after_doc_read() would be able to restore the desired result, along the lines of:
If the doc is a design doc and (there are no security members.roles and no members.names) and (the userCtx doesn't identify
an admin or db-admin)
-> 403 // Forbidden
Thanks,
S.
PS: Overall I'm surprised the changes in that commit used new Erlang code rather than suggesting best-practices using the exisiting security features. I don't understand how hiding the design documents enhances security ("security by obscurity"), but that's beyond what I'm asking here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira