You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@brooklyn.apache.org by Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> on 2016/02/18 16:25:14 UTC
[VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
All,
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
addition to the Brooklyn project.
The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
process before merging the PR.
This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
21st February 2016)
[ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
[ ] 0, no opinion
[ ] -1, reject contribution because...
Thanks,
Richard.
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
With my ASF member hat on, I would wonder if this should not come as a
code grant, given the size of the PR. A quick look at the commits shows
that (if I am not mistaken) most of the contributions come from @geomacy
and @robertgmoss who actually already made significant contributions to
the project for a good while. If they were committers, the code grant
issue would be a moot point, so now I wonder why aren't they?
I guess we could continue this on private@.
Hadrian
On 02/18/2016 10:25 AM, Richard Downer wrote:
> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org>.
+1 binding
Richard.
On 18 February 2016 at 15:25, Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>>150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Thomas Bouron <th...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:26 Geoff Macartney <
geoff.macartney@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> ————————————————————
> Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI
>
>
> > On 18 Feb 2016, at 15:25, Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> > CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> > command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> > UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> > deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> > and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> > addition to the Brooklyn project.
> >
> > The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> > with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> >> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> > the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> > process before merging the PR.
> >
> > This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> > favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> > the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> > Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> > 21st February 2016)
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> > [ ] 0, no opinion
> > [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
>
> --
Thomas Bouron • Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation •
http://www.cloudsoftcorp.com/
Github: https://github.com/tbouron
Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Geoff Macartney <ge...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
————————————————————
Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI
> On 18 Feb 2016, at 15:25, Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Aled Sage <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote:
> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
On 18 February 2016 at 17:08, John McCabe <jo...@johnmccabe.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:52 Duncan Godwin <
> duncan.godwin@cloudsoftcorp.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 18 February 2016 at 15:51, David Lloyd <da...@lloyds.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > /Dave.
> > >
> > > On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote:
> > >
> > >> All,
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> > >> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> > >> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> > >> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> > >> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> > >> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> > >> addition to the Brooklyn project.
> > >>
> > >> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> > >> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> > >>
> > >>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> > >>>
> > >> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> > >> process before merging the PR.
> > >>
> > >> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> > >> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> > >> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> > >> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
> > >>
> > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> > >> 21st February 2016)
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> > >> [ ] 0, no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Richard.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by John McCabe <jo...@johnmccabe.net>.
+1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:52 Duncan Godwin <du...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 18 February 2016 at 15:51, David Lloyd <da...@lloyds.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > /Dave.
> >
> > On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> >> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> >> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> >> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> >> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> >> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> >> addition to the Brooklyn project.
> >>
> >> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> >> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> >>
> >>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> >>>
> >> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> >> process before merging the PR.
> >>
> >> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> >> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> >> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> >> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> >> 21st February 2016)
> >>
> >> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> >> [ ] 0, no opinion
> >> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Richard.
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Duncan Godwin <du...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
On 18 February 2016 at 15:51, David Lloyd <da...@lloyds.org.uk> wrote:
> +1
>
> /Dave.
>
> On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
>> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
>> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
>> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
>> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
>> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
>> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>>
>> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
>> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>>
>>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
>>>
>> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
>> process before merging the PR.
>>
>> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
>> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
>> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
>> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
>> 21st February 2016)
>>
>> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
>> [ ] 0, no opinion
>> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard.
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by David Lloyd <da...@lloyds.org.uk>.
+1
/Dave.
On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote:
> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Guglielmo Nigri <gu...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
On 19 February 2016 at 11:32, Mark McKenna <ma...@cloudsoftcorp.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:25 Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> > CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> > command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> > UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> > deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> > and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> > addition to the Brooklyn project.
> >
> > The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> > with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> > >150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> > the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> > process before merging the PR.
> >
> > This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> > favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> > the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> > Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> > 21st February 2016)
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> > [ ] 0, no opinion
> > [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> --
> *Mark McKenna*
> *twitter:* @markmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>
> *pgp:* public-key
> <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Mark McKenna <ma...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:25 Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> >150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
--
*Mark McKenna*
*twitter:* @markmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>
*pgp:* public-key
<https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Mike Zaccardo <mi...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:33 AM Alex Heneveld <
alex.heneveld@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> Alex
>
> On 18/02/2016 18:14, Svetoslav Neykov wrote:
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Svet.
> >
> >
> >> On 18.02.2016 г., at 18:09, Duncan Johnston Watt <
> duncan.johnstonwatt@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Duncan Johnston-Watt
> >> CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
> >>
> >> Twitter | @duncanjw
> >> Mobile | +44 777 190 2653
> >> Skype | duncan_johnstonwatt
> >> Linkedin | www.linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt
> >>
> >> On 18 February 2016 at 15:25, Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> >>> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> >>> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> >>> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> >>> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> >>> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> >>> addition to the Brooklyn project.
> >>>
> >>> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> >>> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> >>>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> >>> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> >>> process before merging the PR.
> >>>
> >>> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> >>> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> >>> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> >>> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> >>> 21st February 2016)
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> >>> [ ] 0, no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Richard.
> >>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Alex Heneveld <al...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1 binding
Alex
On 18/02/2016 18:14, Svetoslav Neykov wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Svet.
>
>
>> On 18.02.2016 г., at 18:09, Duncan Johnston Watt <du...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Duncan Johnston-Watt
>> CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
>>
>> Twitter | @duncanjw
>> Mobile | +44 777 190 2653
>> Skype | duncan_johnstonwatt
>> Linkedin | www.linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt
>>
>> On 18 February 2016 at 15:25, Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
>>> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
>>> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
>>> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
>>> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
>>> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
>>> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>>>
>>> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
>>> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>>>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
>>> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
>>> process before merging the PR.
>>>
>>> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
>>> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
>>> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
>>> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
>>> 21st February 2016)
>>>
>>> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
>>> [ ] 0, no opinion
>>> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard.
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Svetoslav Neykov <sv...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1 binding
Svet.
> On 18.02.2016 г., at 18:09, Duncan Johnston Watt <du...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Duncan Johnston-Watt
> CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
>
> Twitter | @duncanjw
> Mobile | +44 777 190 2653
> Skype | duncan_johnstonwatt
> Linkedin | www.linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt
>
> On 18 February 2016 at 15:25, Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
>> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
>> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
>> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
>> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
>> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
>> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>>
>> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
>> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
>> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
>> process before merging the PR.
>>
>> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
>> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
>> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
>> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
>> 21st February 2016)
>>
>> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
>> [ ] 0, no opinion
>> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI
Posted by Duncan Johnston Watt <du...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
+1
Duncan Johnston-Watt
CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
Twitter | @duncanjw
Mobile | +44 777 190 2653
Skype | duncan_johnstonwatt
Linkedin | www.linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt
On 18 February 2016 at 15:25, Richard Downer <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> >150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>