You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/08/07 17:57:33 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10229] - Request parameters lost after authenticated through login page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10229>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10229

Request parameters lost after authenticated through login page





------- Additional Comments From adam.hardy@cyberspaceroad.com  2003-08-07 15:57 -------
I tried this with org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector as you
suggested and the bug occurred here as well. Using 4.1.27.

Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Jean-Francois Arcand <Je...@Sun.COM>.

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
> 
>> +1. There is 1 bug in bugtraq currently open about *.jsp url mapping 
>> that I need to investigate (I'm not sure yet it's a bug) but I hope to 
>> have a fix before Sunday.
> 
> 
> And what would the bug be ?
> (I think I know the mapper code far better than you do, so it would be 
> faster ;-) Of course, it might not be a mapper bug)

That was an NPE that occured when the digester thrown a 
IllegalArgumentException. That was a user error but we should not see 
the NPE :-) Now we may want to avoid calling preRegister when this 
situation occurs.....

-- Jeanfrancois


> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Jean-Francois Arcand <Je...@Sun.COM>.

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
> 
>> +1. There is 1 bug in bugtraq currently open about *.jsp url mapping 
>> that I need to investigate (I'm not sure yet it's a bug) but I hope to 
>> have a fix before Sunday.
> 
> 
> And what would the bug be ?
> (I think I know the mapper code far better than you do, so it would be 
> faster ;-) Of course, it might not be a mapper bug)

That was an NPE that occured when the digester thrown a 
IllegalArgumentException. That was a user error but we should not see 
the NPE :-) Now we may want to avoid calling preRegister when this 
situation occurs.....

-- Jeanfrancois


> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
> +1. There is 1 bug in bugtraq currently open about *.jsp url mapping 
> that I need to investigate (I'm not sure yet it's a bug) but I hope to 
> have a fix before Sunday.

And what would the bug be ?
(I think I know the mapper code far better than you do, so it would be 
faster ;-) Of course, it might not be a mapper bug)

Remy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
> +1. There is 1 bug in bugtraq currently open about *.jsp url mapping 
> that I need to investigate (I'm not sure yet it's a bug) but I hope to 
> have a fix before Sunday.

And what would the bug be ?
(I think I know the mapper code far better than you do, so it would be 
faster ;-) Of course, it might not be a mapper bug)

Remy


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Jean-Francois Arcand <Je...@Sun.COM>.
+1. There is 1 bug in bugtraq currently open about *.jsp url mapping 
that I need to investigate (I'm not sure yet it's a bug) but I hope to 
have a fix before Sunday.

-- Jeanfrancois

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
> 
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Tim Funk <fu...@joedog.org>.
+1

I'm out next week, but when I get back I hope to squash most JDBCRealm bugs. 
(which apply to 5 and 4.1)


-Tim

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
> 
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> 
>> "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote in message
>> news:3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org...
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
>>> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>>
>>> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
>>> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF
>>> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++
>>> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
>>
>>
>> Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for
>> commons-daemon on Unix.  Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very
>> interested).
> 
> 
> There's nothing for Unix. The JSVC wrapper should allow using Tomcat as 
> non root on port 80.
> 
>> For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to
>> meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer 
>> (but not
>> my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access).  If
>> you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs 
>> will be
>> fixed in 5.0.8.
> 
> 
> All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220, 
> 21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun 
> should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather 
> than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
> 5.0.8 is good enough :)

I have the same problem when stopping in win9x.

> 
>> You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous
>> paragraph).  If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should 
>> still
>> work with W2K.
> 
> 
> Yes. I think JF made it so that procrun is supposed to run on Windows 9x 
> also. Do you think compiling on XP could still produce 9x compatible 
> binaries ?

I do not known but if you send me the binary I will test it.

> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> 
>> "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote in message
>> news:3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org...
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
>>> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>>
>>> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
>>> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF
>>> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++
>>> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
>>
>>
>> Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for
>> commons-daemon on Unix.  Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very
>> interested).
> 
> 
> There's nothing for Unix. The JSVC wrapper should allow using Tomcat as 
> non root on port 80.
> 
>> For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to
>> meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer 
>> (but not
>> my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access).  If
>> you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs 
>> will be
>> fixed in 5.0.8.
> 
> 
> All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220, 
> 21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun 
> should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather 
> than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
> 5.0.8 is good enough :)

I have the same problem when stopping in win9x.

> 
>> You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous
>> paragraph).  If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should 
>> still
>> work with W2K.
> 
> 
> Yes. I think JF made it so that procrun is supposed to run on Windows 9x 
> also. Do you think compiling on XP could still produce 9x compatible 
> binaries ?

I do not known but if you send me the binary I will test it.

> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday


> Bill Barker wrote:
> >>All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220,
> >>21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun
> >>should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather
> >>than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
> >>5.0.8 is good enough :)
> >
> > It turns out that I had a bit of spare time this afternoon to look at
this.
> > I can give you a tomcat(w) that fixes 21279 and 22174.  The binaries
will be
>
> Great :)
>
> > for my code, since I don't have CVS access here, and don't feel like
doing
> > the merge with JFC's commit manually.
>
> I'm confused. I saw your commits and new binaries. What's missing ?

JFC made commits in the morning (for better cygwin support).  However,
looking at his, they only affect the debug build, not the release build that
I checked in.

>
> Thanks,
> Remy
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker wrote:
>>All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220,
>>21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun
>>should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather
>>than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
>>5.0.8 is good enough :)
> 
> It turns out that I had a bit of spare time this afternoon to look at this.
> I can give you a tomcat(w) that fixes 21279 and 22174.  The binaries will be

Great :)

> for my code, since I don't have CVS access here, and don't feel like doing
> the merge with JFC's commit manually.

I'm confused. I saw your commits and new binaries. What's missing ?

Thanks,
Remy


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker wrote:
>>All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220,
>>21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun
>>should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather
>>than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
>>5.0.8 is good enough :)
> 
> It turns out that I had a bit of spare time this afternoon to look at this.
> I can give you a tomcat(w) that fixes 21279 and 22174.  The binaries will be

Great :)

> for my code, since I don't have CVS access here, and don't feel like doing
> the merge with JFC's commit manually.

I'm confused. I saw your commits and new binaries. What's missing ?

Thanks,
Remy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday


> Bill Barker wrote:
> > "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote in message
> > news:3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org...
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
> >>which would need to be resolved by then ?
> >>
> >>A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
> >>Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF
> >>?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++
> >>prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> >
> > Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for
> > commons-daemon on Unix.  Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very
> > interested).
>
> There's nothing for Unix. The JSVC wrapper should allow using Tomcat as
> non root on port 80.
>
> > For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to
> > meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer (but
not
> > my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access).
If
> > you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs will
be
> > fixed in 5.0.8.
>
> All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220,
> 21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun
> should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather
> than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
> 5.0.8 is good enough :)

It turns out that I had a bit of spare time this afternoon to look at this.
I can give you a tomcat(w) that fixes 21279 and 22174.  The binaries will be
for my code, since I don't have CVS access here, and don't feel like doing
the merge with JFC's commit manually.

>
> > You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous
> > paragraph).  If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should
still
> > work with W2K.
>
> Yes. I think JF made it so that procrun is supposed to run on Windows 9x
> also. Do you think compiling on XP could still produce 9x compatible
> binaries ?
>
> Thanks :)
>
> Remy
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker wrote:
> "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote in message
> news:3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org...
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
>>which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>
>>A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
>>Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF
>>?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++
>>prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for
> commons-daemon on Unix.  Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very
> interested).

There's nothing for Unix. The JSVC wrapper should allow using Tomcat as 
non root on port 80.

> For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to
> meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer (but not
> my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access).  If
> you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs will be
> fixed in 5.0.8.

All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220, 
21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun 
should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather 
than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
5.0.8 is good enough :)

> You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous
> paragraph).  If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should still
> work with W2K.

Yes. I think JF made it so that procrun is supposed to run on Windows 9x 
also. Do you think compiling on XP could still produce 9x compatible 
binaries ?

Thanks :)

Remy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker wrote:
> "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote in message
> news:3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org...
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
>>which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>
>>A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
>>Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF
>>?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++
>>prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for
> commons-daemon on Unix.  Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very
> interested).

There's nothing for Unix. The JSVC wrapper should allow using Tomcat as 
non root on port 80.

> For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to
> meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer (but not
> my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access).  If
> you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs will be
> fixed in 5.0.8.

All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220, 
21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun 
should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather 
than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174.
5.0.8 is good enough :)

> You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous
> paragraph).  If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should still
> work with W2K.

Yes. I think JF made it so that procrun is supposed to run on Windows 9x 
also. Do you think compiling on XP could still produce 9x compatible 
binaries ?

Thanks :)

Remy


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
"Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote in message
news:3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org...
> Hi,
>
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?

Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for
commons-daemon on Unix.  Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very
interested).

For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to
meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer (but not
my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access).  If
you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs will be
fixed in 5.0.8.

You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous
paragraph).  If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should still
work with W2K.

>
> Thanks,
> Remy




Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
> 
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
>>> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>>
>>> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
>>> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, 
>>> JF ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
>>> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
>>
>>
>>
>> I use _only_ cygwin and gcc for the developements I have done for 
>> windoze.
> 
> 
> Even for the .exe wrapper for Windows ? How does it work ?
> 
> Could you explain ? (I don't have than many bugs to work anymore on 
> Tomcat itself, so I could help too)

Probably :)
in jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/Makefile I use the 
option -mno-cygwin when compiling procrun, the resulting is an executable that 
does need cygwin to run.

> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
> 
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
>>> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>>
>>> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
>>> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, 
>>> JF ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
>>> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
>>
>>
>>
>> I use _only_ cygwin and gcc for the developements I have done for 
>> windoze.
> 
> 
> Even for the .exe wrapper for Windows ? How does it work ?
> 
> Could you explain ? (I don't have than many bugs to work anymore on 
> Tomcat itself, so I could help too)

Probably :)
in jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/Makefile I use the 
option -mno-cygwin when compiling procrun, the resulting is an executable that 
does need cygwin to run.

> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
>> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>
>> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
>> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, 
>> JF ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
>> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> 
> I use _only_ cygwin and gcc for the developements I have done for windoze.

Even for the .exe wrapper for Windows ? How does it work ?

Could you explain ? (I don't have than many bugs to work anymore on 
Tomcat itself, so I could help too)

Thanks :)

Remy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
>> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>>
>> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
>> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, 
>> JF ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
>> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> 
> I use _only_ cygwin and gcc for the developements I have done for windoze.

Even for the .exe wrapper for Windows ? How does it work ?

Could you explain ? (I don't have than many bugs to work anymore on 
Tomcat itself, so I could help too)

Thanks :)

Remy


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
> 
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?

I use _only_ cygwin and gcc for the developements I have done for windoze.

> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Jean-Francois Arcand <Je...@Sun.COM>.
+1. There is 1 bug in bugtraq currently open about *.jsp url mapping 
that I need to investigate (I'm not sure yet it's a bug) but I hope to 
have a fix before Sunday.

-- Jeanfrancois

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
> 
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
> 
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?

I use _only_ cygwin and gcc for the developements I have done for windoze.

> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 



Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
"Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote in message
news:3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org...
> Hi,
>
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
>
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?

Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for
commons-daemon on Unix.  Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very
interested).

For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to
meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer (but not
my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access).  If
you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs will be
fixed in 5.0.8.

You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous
paragraph).  If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should still
work with W2K.

>
> Thanks,
> Remy




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Tim Funk <fu...@joedog.org>.
+1

I'm out next week, but when I get back I hope to squash most JDBCRealm bugs. 
(which apply to 5 and 4.1)


-Tim

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
> which would need to be resolved by then ?
> 
> A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
> Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
> ?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
> prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


[5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Hi,

I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
which would need to be resolved by then ?

A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?

Thanks,
Remy


[5.0.7] New build by Sunday

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Hi,

I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues 
which would need to be resolved by then ?

A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new 
Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF 
?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ 
prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ?

Thanks,
Remy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org