You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by "Zampani, Michael" <za...@amazon.com> on 2011/12/01 18:54:07 UTC

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52259] synchonization issues and dead lock if no realm is presented in configuration

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla@apache.org [mailto:bugzilla@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:59 AM
> To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52259] synchonization issues and dead lock if no
> realm is presented in configuration
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52259
> 
> Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |FIXED
> 
> --- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 2011-11-29
> 19:59:28 UTC --- Fixed in trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in 7.0.24
> onwards.
> 
> --
> Configure bugmail:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the
> bug.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org

Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug with a workaround?

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52259] synchonization issues and dead lock if no realm is presented in configuration

Posted by Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com>.
2011/12/2 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>:
> Mark,
>
> On 12/1/11 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 17:54, Zampani, Michael wrote:
>>> Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug with a workaround?
>>
>> It already is.
>
> Yes and no: it's in the changelog, but the changelog currently published
> on the website doesn't cover anything past 7.0.23.
>

There is link here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/bugreport.html#Recently_fixed_issues

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52259] synchonization issues and dead lock if no realm is presented in configuration

Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 02/12/2011 15:59, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
> 
> On 12/1/11 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 17:54, Zampani, Michael wrote:
>>> Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug
>>> with a workaround?
>> 
>> It already is.
> 
> Yes and no: it's in the changelog, but the changelog currently
> published on the website doesn't cover anything past 7.0.23.

The latest changelog is always available from svn and is formatted so
it prints nicely:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml


There are also multiple bug reports in BZ that includes the work-around.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52259] synchonization issues and dead lock if no realm is presented in configuration

Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
Mark,

On 12/1/11 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 17:54, Zampani, Michael wrote:
>> Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug with a workaround?
> 
> It already is.

Yes and no: it's in the changelog, but the changelog currently published
on the website doesn't cover anything past 7.0.23.

-chris


Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52259] synchonization issues and dead lock if no realm is presented in configuration

Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 01/12/2011 17:54, Zampani, Michael wrote:
> Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug with a workaround?

It already is.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org