You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by John Chan <jc...@verity.com> on 2002/03/02 01:27:03 UTC
mod_webapp with apache 2.0
Hi,
I'm trying to build webapp on Red Hat 7.2 to use with Apache 2.0. All
the documentation refers to the output being a .so file but I don't get one.
I get a .o .la .slo and a .lo (which is pointing to the .o file). I took a
look at the make file, and it doesn't make any mention of .so. I also tried
a couple different versions of libtool (shot in the dark) but no go. Not
being very knowledgeable in this matter, is there a problem or is this the
expected output. Thanks.
John
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: mod_webapp with apache 2.0
Posted by Cavan Morris <ca...@worldnet.att.net>.
Your right about the makefile. I guess what I said before wasn't exactly so. What I ment was that the output of the make command didn't link it shared. What I actually did to "fix" it was copy the last libtool opperation from the output to the command line, edit it, and rerun it. Here is exactly what I do to build mod_webapp.so. If this doesn't work, contact me directly and I'll send you my binary.
>tar -xvzf ./webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402-src.tar.gz
>cd webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402/
>./support/buildconf.sh
>./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs
>make
This produces some output that I examine for the line which I copy and past and edit to get the .so file.
>cd apache-2.0/
I copy the following from the output:
/usr/local/apache2/build/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -o mod_webapp.la -rpath /usr/local/apache2/modules -module -avoid-version -I../include -L../lib -lwebapp mod_webapp.lo
And edit it like so to produce the last command. The changes I made were after the gcc, I added -shared and changed the name of the output file after -o from mod_webapp.la to mod_webapp.so
>/usr/local/apache2/build/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -shared -o mod_webapp.so -rpath /usr/local/apache2/modules -module -avoid-version -I../include -L../lib -lwebapp mod_webapp.lo
That is all I had to do... But it did not work with apache 2.0.28. It only worked with apache 2.0.32
Cavan Morris
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Chan" <jc...@verity.com>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Cc: <ca...@worldnet.att.net>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: mod_webapp with apache 2.0
> Hi...
>
> Would you be so kind as to send the makefile you used. I don't really
> understand how the whole compile process here works. From what I can see,
> running make (the one generated by configure) only runs apxs... Thanks in
> advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
> > I believe the makefile is wrong. I had to look at the output of the make
> command and find a command near the end that was run in the
> <base>/apache-2.0 dir that was linking mod_webapp.la. I then copies that
> command, added the -shared flag and changed the output to mod_webapp.so.
> > This worked for me with apache 2.0.32 but not 2.0.28.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Chan" <jc...@verity.com>
> > To: "Tomcat" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 4:27 PM
> > Subject: mod_webapp with apache 2.0
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to build webapp on Red Hat 7.2 to use with Apache 2.0.
> All
> > > the documentation refers to the output being a .so file but I don't get
> one.
> > > I get a .o .la .slo and a .lo (which is pointing to the .o file). I took
> a
> > > look at the make file, and it doesn't make any mention of .so. I also
> tried
> > > a couple different versions of libtool (shot in the dark) but no go. Not
> > > being very knowledgeable in this matter, is there a problem or is this
> the
> > > expected output. Thanks.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: mod_webapp with apache 2.0
Posted by John Chan <jc...@verity.com>.
Hi...
Would you be so kind as to send the makefile you used. I don't really
understand how the whole compile process here works. From what I can see,
running make (the one generated by configure) only runs apxs... Thanks in
advance.
Regards,
John
> I believe the makefile is wrong. I had to look at the output of the make
command and find a command near the end that was run in the
<base>/apache-2.0 dir that was linking mod_webapp.la. I then copies that
command, added the -shared flag and changed the output to mod_webapp.so.
> This worked for me with apache 2.0.32 but not 2.0.28.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Chan" <jc...@verity.com>
> To: "Tomcat" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 4:27 PM
> Subject: mod_webapp with apache 2.0
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to build webapp on Red Hat 7.2 to use with Apache 2.0.
All
> > the documentation refers to the output being a .so file but I don't get
one.
> > I get a .o .la .slo and a .lo (which is pointing to the .o file). I took
a
> > look at the make file, and it doesn't make any mention of .so. I also
tried
> > a couple different versions of libtool (shot in the dark) but no go. Not
> > being very knowledgeable in this matter, is there a problem or is this
the
> > expected output. Thanks.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: mod_webapp with apache 2.0
Posted by Cavan Morris <ca...@worldnet.att.net>.
I believe the makefile is wrong. I had to look at the output of the make command and find a command near the end that was run in the <base>/apache-2.0 dir that was linking mod_webapp.la. I then copies that command, added the -shared flag and changed the output to mod_webapp.so.
This worked for me with apache 2.0.32 but not 2.0.28.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Chan" <jc...@verity.com>
To: "Tomcat" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 4:27 PM
Subject: mod_webapp with apache 2.0
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build webapp on Red Hat 7.2 to use with Apache 2.0. All
> the documentation refers to the output being a .so file but I don't get one.
> I get a .o .la .slo and a .lo (which is pointing to the .o file). I took a
> look at the make file, and it doesn't make any mention of .so. I also tried
> a couple different versions of libtool (shot in the dark) but no go. Not
> being very knowledgeable in this matter, is there a problem or is this the
> expected output. Thanks.
>
> John
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>