You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> on 2007/06/29 21:51:15 UTC
[general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2?
What do you think? It has withstood everything that Tatyana has thrown
at it (thanks!), and while it has some remaining known issues there is
nothing to stop us calling it out best effort so far.
Shall we reopen the code to daily development work?
Regards,
Tim
Re: [general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2?
Posted by Alexei Zakharov <al...@gmail.com>.
> If there is disagreement, would anyone be opposed to fixing the URLs
> for the Eclipse dependencies in the repo? Eclipse 3.3 was released and
> all of the milestone URLs we were referencing are gone now.
+1 for switching to eclipse 3.3
+1 for the subj as well.
With best regards,
2007/6/30, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org>:
> I think we should go for it.
>
> If there is disagreement, would anyone be opposed to fixing the URLs
> for the Eclipse dependencies in the repo? Eclipse 3.3 was released and
> all of the milestone URLs we were referencing are gone now.
>
> -Nathan
>
> On 6/29/07, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do you think? It has withstood everything that Tatyana has thrown
> > at it (thanks!), and while it has some remaining known issues there is
> > nothing to stop us calling it out best effort so far.
> >
> > Shall we reopen the code to daily development work?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel ESSD
Re: [general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2?
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org>.
I think we should go for it.
If there is disagreement, would anyone be opposed to fixing the URLs
for the Eclipse dependencies in the repo? Eclipse 3.3 was released and
all of the milestone URLs we were referencing are gone now.
-Nathan
On 6/29/07, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you think? It has withstood everything that Tatyana has thrown
> at it (thanks!), and while it has some remaining known issues there is
> nothing to stop us calling it out best effort so far.
>
> Shall we reopen the code to daily development work?
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
Re: [general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2?
Posted by Yang Paulex <pa...@gmail.com>.
2007/6/30, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>:
>
> What do you think? It has withstood everything that Tatyana has thrown
> at it (thanks!), and while it has some remaining known issues there is
> nothing to stop us calling it out best effort so far.
>
> Shall we reopen the code to daily development work?
+1
Regards,
> Tim
>
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development laboratory
IBM
Re: [general] Promote snapshot r551077 to M2?
Posted by Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>.
I agree
Thanks,
Mikhail
2007/6/30, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>:
> What do you think? It has withstood everything that Tatyana has thrown
> at it (thanks!), and while it has some remaining known issues there is
> nothing to stop us calling it out best effort so far.
>
> Shall we reopen the code to daily development work?
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>