You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com> on 2013/08/23 20:55:03 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Hi All,
I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Sebastien Goasguen <ru...@gmail.com>.
Animesh,
In the 4.0 testing procedure we had some basic test for AWS, they are not there in the 4.2 test procedure.
Since it apparently got broken in 4.1 , I would like to make sure that we have AWS working in 4.2.
I will try to test this on monday
-Sebastien
On Aug 23, 2013, at 2:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>.
Animesh,
You can just pick up the single commits. e.g.
commit 13a415fe8a3917a49dae5a1f3998f5ae78a61da3
Author: Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>
Date: Mon Aug 26 15:33:39 2013 -0600
Not everyone wants to use Mutual CHAP with VMware - make it optional.
--Sheng
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and
> instead pick the one from Jessica?
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM
> To: Brian Federle
> Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <Brian.Federle@citrix.com
> <ma...@citrix.com>> wrote:
> Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this commit
> below yours:
>
> commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
> Author: Jessica Wang <jessicawang@apache.org<mailto:jessicawang@apache.org
> >>
> Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
>
> CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure
> physical network > edit traffic type label > split
>
> Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you.
>
> I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git myself
> in the past when I forget to rebase :D
>
> -Brian
>
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
> To: Mike Tutkowski
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Brian
> Federle; Jessica Wang
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
>
> Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
>
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Brian
> Federle
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> I don't understand how those got in there.
>
> I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
>
> They are not related to my fix.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>>
> wrote:
> Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
>
> I see a few changes to
>
> Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
>
> Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
>
>
> Animesh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<mailto:
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > OK, Animesh.
> >
> > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<mailto:
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > >> >
> > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > >> >
> > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > >> >
> > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> > >> > need to modify.
> > >> >
> > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > >> >
> > >> > Talk to you later,
> > >> >
> > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Tutkowski
> Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Tutkowski
> Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>.
Hi Sheng,
Done, thanks.
I used to use git-format-patch, but recently I've been using RBTools /
post-review.
What is the difference between the patches generated by post-review
and git-format-patch?
If post-review produces diffs we don't like, we can probably remove
the recommendation to use it from here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git
Thanks,
Dave.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I've committed your patch to 4.2-forwarding.
>
> But it cannot apply on MASTER, so please rebase it.
>
> And it would be better if you use git-format-patch to generate patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sheng,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing.
> >
> > The name change is also necessary for 4.2. Since the code changes are
> > entirely restricted to plugin code (all within the midonet dir), I think
> > it's a very safe change.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dave.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > I've taken a look at the patch. The dhcp capability fix is pretty
> simple,
> > > but the name changing part involved much more modifications. Can the
> name
> > > change done after 4.2? It should reduce the patch size a lot.
> > >
> > > --Sheng
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's
> > > > restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change
> to
> > > > grab.
> > > >
> > > > Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the
> > change,
> > > as
> > > > it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in
> core
> > > > code
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dave.
> > > > 2013年8月27日火曜日 Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and
> > > > > instead pick the one from Jessica?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Animesh
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > <javascript:;>]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM
> > > > > To: Brian Federle
> > > > > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>;
> > > > Jessica
> > > > > Wang
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <
> > > Brian.Federle@citrix.com
> > > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <mailto:Brian.Federle@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > > Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this
> > > > commit
> > > > > below yours:
> > > > >
> > > > > commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
> > > > > Author: Jessica Wang <jessicawang@apache.org<javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> > > > > Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
> > > > >
> > > > > CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware >
> configure
> > > > > physical network > edit traffic type label > split
> > > > >
> > > > > Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as
> > you.
> > > > >
> > > > > I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git
> > > myself
> > > > > in the past when I forget to rebase :D
> > > > >
> > > > > -Brian
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
> > > > > To: Mike Tutkowski
> > > > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle; Jessica
> > Wang
> > > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking
> > > branch
> > > > > 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
> > > > >
> > > > > Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > <javascript:;>]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> > > > > To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't understand how those got in there.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier
> checkin.
> > > > >
> > > > > They are not related to my fix.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > > Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
> > > > >
> > > > > I see a few changes to
> > > > >
> > > > > Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> > > > > Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
> > > > >
> > > > > Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Animesh
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK, Animesh.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > > > > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This
> > fix
> > > > > > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and
> > should
> > > > > > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code
> has
> > > > been
> > > > > > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that
> I
> > > > would
> > > > > > >> > need to modify.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Talk to you later,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike Tutkowski
> > > > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike Tutkowski
> > > > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>.
Hi Dave,
I've committed your patch to 4.2-forwarding.
But it cannot apply on MASTER, so please rebase it.
And it would be better if you use git-format-patch to generate patch.
Thanks!
--Sheng
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com> wrote:
> Hi Sheng,
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> The name change is also necessary for 4.2. Since the code changes are
> entirely restricted to plugin code (all within the midonet dir), I think
> it's a very safe change.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I've taken a look at the patch. The dhcp capability fix is pretty simple,
> > but the name changing part involved much more modifications. Can the name
> > change done after 4.2? It should reduce the patch size a lot.
> >
> > --Sheng
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's
> > > restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change to
> > > grab.
> > >
> > > Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the
> change,
> > as
> > > it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in core
> > > code
> > > .
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dave.
> > > 2013年8月27日火曜日 Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com:
> > >
> > > > Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and
> > > > instead pick the one from Jessica?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Animesh
> > > >
> > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > <javascript:;>]
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM
> > > > To: Brian Federle
> > > > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>;
> > > Jessica
> > > > Wang
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <
> > Brian.Federle@citrix.com
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > <mailto:Brian.Federle@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this
> > > commit
> > > > below yours:
> > > >
> > > > commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
> > > > Author: Jessica Wang <jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> > > > Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
> > > >
> > > > CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure
> > > > physical network > edit traffic type label > split
> > > >
> > > > Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as
> you.
> > > >
> > > > I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git
> > myself
> > > > in the past when I forget to rebase :D
> > > >
> > > > -Brian
> > > >
> > > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
> > > > To: Mike Tutkowski
> > > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle; Jessica
> Wang
> > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > >
> > > > Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking
> > branch
> > > > 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
> > > >
> > > > Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
> > > >
> > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > <javascript:;>]
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> > > > To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand how those got in there.
> > > >
> > > > I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
> > > >
> > > > They are not related to my fix.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
> > > >
> > > > I see a few changes to
> > > >
> > > > Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> > > > Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
> > > >
> > > > Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Animesh
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, Animesh.
> > > > >
> > > > > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > > > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This
> fix
> > > > > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and
> should
> > > > > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has
> > > been
> > > > > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I
> > > would
> > > > > >> > need to modify.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Talk to you later,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > *(tm)*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Mike Tutkowski
> > > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Mike Tutkowski
> > > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>.
Hi Sheng,
Thanks for reviewing.
The name change is also necessary for 4.2. Since the code changes are
entirely restricted to plugin code (all within the midonet dir), I think
it's a very safe change.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I've taken a look at the patch. The dhcp capability fix is pretty simple,
> but the name changing part involved much more modifications. Can the name
> change done after 4.2? It should reduce the patch size a lot.
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's
> > restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change to
> > grab.
> >
> > Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the change,
> as
> > it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in core
> > code
> > .
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dave.
> > 2013年8月27日火曜日 Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com:
> >
> > > Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and
> > > instead pick the one from Jessica?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Animesh
> > >
> > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> <javascript:;>]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM
> > > To: Brian Federle
> > > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>;
> > Jessica
> > > Wang
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >
> > > Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <
> Brian.Federle@citrix.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > > <mailto:Brian.Federle@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this
> > commit
> > > below yours:
> > >
> > > commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
> > > Author: Jessica Wang <jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> > > Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
> > >
> > > CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure
> > > physical network > edit traffic type label > split
> > >
> > > Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you.
> > >
> > > I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git
> myself
> > > in the past when I forget to rebase :D
> > >
> > > -Brian
> > >
> > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
> > > To: Mike Tutkowski
> > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
> > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >
> > > Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking
> branch
> > > 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
> > >
> > > Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
> > >
> > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> <javascript:;>]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> > > To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >
> > > I don't understand how those got in there.
> > >
> > > I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
> > >
> > > They are not related to my fix.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
> > >
> > > I see a few changes to
> > >
> > > Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> > > Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
> > >
> > > Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > Animesh
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> <javascript:;>
> > > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > >
> > > > OK, Animesh.
> > > >
> > > > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> > > > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> > > > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has
> > been
> > > > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I
> > would
> > > > >> > need to modify.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Talk to you later,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > *(tm)*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Tutkowski
> > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Tutkowski
> > > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> > >
> >
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Your patch is in review board and not committed yet. It needs to be reviewed and committed in a branch before it can be picked up for 4.2 RC build. Copying Hugo (called out as reviewer in review board) and Chiradeep
Thanks
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcahill@midokura.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Mike Tutkowski; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> Hi,
>
> I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's
> restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change to
> grab.
>
> Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the change,
> as it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in
> core code .
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>.
Hi Dave,
I've taken a look at the patch. The dhcp capability fix is pretty simple,
but the name changing part involved much more modifications. Can the name
change done after 4.2? It should reduce the patch size a lot.
--Sheng
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's
> restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change to
> grab.
>
> Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the change, as
> it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in core
> code
> .
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
> 2013年8月27日火曜日 Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com:
>
> > Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and
> > instead pick the one from Jessica?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Animesh
> >
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM
> > To: Brian Federle
> > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>;
> Jessica
> > Wang
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <Brian.Federle@citrix.com
> <javascript:;>
> > <mailto:Brian.Federle@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this
> commit
> > below yours:
> >
> > commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
> > Author: Jessica Wang <jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> > Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure
> > physical network > edit traffic type label > split
> >
> > Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you.
> >
> > I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git myself
> > in the past when I forget to rebase :D
> >
> > -Brian
> >
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
> > To: Mike Tutkowski
> > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking branch
> > 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
> >
> > Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
> >
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> > To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > I don't understand how those got in there.
> >
> > I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
> >
> > They are not related to my fix.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
> >
> > I see a few changes to
> >
> > Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> > Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
> >
> > Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
> >
> >
> > Animesh
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<javascript:;>
> > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >
> > > OK, Animesh.
> > >
> > > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> <javascript:;>
> > <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> > > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> > > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has
> been
> > > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I
> would
> > > >> > need to modify.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Talk to you later,
> > > >> >
> > > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > *(tm)*
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Tutkowski
> > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Tutkowski
> > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>.
Hi,
I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's
restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change to
grab.
Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the change, as
it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in core code
.
Thanks,
Dave.
2013年8月27日火曜日 Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com:
> Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and
> instead pick the one from Jessica?
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM
> To: Brian Federle
> Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>; Jessica
> Wang
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <Brian.Federle@citrix.com<javascript:;>
> <mailto:Brian.Federle@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this commit
> below yours:
>
> commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
> Author: Jessica Wang <jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> jessicawang@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
>
> CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure
> physical network > edit traffic type label > split
>
> Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you.
>
> I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git myself
> in the past when I forget to rebase :D
>
> -Brian
>
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
> To: Mike Tutkowski
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
>
> Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
>
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Brian Federle
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> I don't understand how those got in there.
>
> I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
>
> They are not related to my fix.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
>
> I see a few changes to
>
> Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
>
> Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
>
>
> Animesh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>
> <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > OK, Animesh.
> >
> > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<javascript:;>
> <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > >> >
> > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > >> >
> > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > >> >
> > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> > >> > need to modify.
> > >> >
> > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > >> >
> > >> > Talk to you later,
> > >> >
> > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Tutkowski
> Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Tutkowski
> Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;><mailto:
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and instead pick the one from Jessica?
Thanks
Animesh
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM
To: Brian Federle
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this commit below yours:
commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
Author: Jessica Wang <je...@apache.org>>
Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure physical network > edit traffic type label > split
Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you.
I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git myself in the past when I forget to rebase :D
-Brian
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
To: Mike Tutkowski
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Brian Federle
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
I don't understand how those got in there.
I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
They are not related to my fix.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
I see a few changes to
Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> OK, Animesh.
>
> My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
>
> > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>]
> >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >> >
> >> > Hi Animesh,
> >> >
> >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> >> >
> >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> >> >
> >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> >> > need to modify.
> >> >
> >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> >> >
> >> > Talk to you later,
> >> >
> >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *(tm)*
--
Mike Tutkowski
Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
--
Mike Tutkowski
Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>wrote:
> Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this
> commit below yours:****
>
> ** **
>
> commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48****
>
> Author: Jessica Wang <je...@apache.org>****
>
> Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700****
>
> ** **
>
> CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure
> physical network > edit traffic type label > split****
>
> ** **
>
> Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you.***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> I only think this because I’ve definitely screwed stuff up in git myself
> in the past when I forget to rebase :D****
>
> ** **
>
> -Brian****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Animesh Chaturvedi
> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
> *To:* Mike Tutkowski
> *Cc:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
> *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0****
>
> ** **
>
> Mike the commit message shows it is a merge “Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward”****
>
> ** **
>
> Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread. ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<mi...@solidfire.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> *To:* Animesh Chaturvedi
> *Cc:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Brian Federle
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0****
>
> ** **
>
> I don't understand how those got in there.****
>
> ** **
>
> I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.****
>
> ** **
>
> They are not related to my fix.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:****
>
> Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
>
> I see a few changes to
>
> Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
>
> Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
>
>
> Animesh****
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]****
>
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > OK, Animesh.
> >
> > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > >> >
> > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > >> >
> > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > >> >
> > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> > >> > need to modify.
> > >> >
> > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > >> >
> > >> > Talk to you later,
> > >> >
> > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --****
>
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the****
>
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*****
>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the****
>
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*****
>
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com****
>
> o: 303.746.7302****
>
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*****
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>.
Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this commit below yours:
commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48
Author: Jessica Wang <je...@apache.org>
Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700
CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure physical network > edit traffic type label > split
Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you.
I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git myself in the past when I forget to rebase :D
-Brian
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM
To: Mike Tutkowski
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Brian Federle
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
I don't understand how those got in there.
I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
They are not related to my fix.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
I see a few changes to
Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> OK, Animesh.
>
> My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
>
> > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>]
> >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >> >
> >> > Hi Animesh,
> >> >
> >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> >> >
> >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> >> >
> >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> >> > need to modify.
> >> >
> >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> >> >
> >> > Talk to you later,
> >> >
> >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *(tm)*
--
Mike Tutkowski
Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
I probably should have done a rebase instead of a merge.
I think her changes were merged into my local 4.2-forward branch and then I
pushed my branch.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Yeah, that is interesting.
>
> My changes are only these:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=13a415fe8a3917a49dae5a1f3998f5ae78a61da3
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Mike the commit message shows it is a merge “Merge remote-tracking
>> branch 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward”****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
>> *To:* Animesh Chaturvedi
>> *Cc:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Brian Federle
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I don't understand how those got in there.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> They are not related to my fix.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
>> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:****
>>
>> Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
>>
>> I see a few changes to
>>
>> Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
>> Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
>>
>> Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
>>
>>
>> Animesh****
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]****
>>
>> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>> >
>> > OK, Animesh.
>> >
>> > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
>> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> > -----Original Message-----
>> > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
>> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
>> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Hi Animesh,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
>> > >> >
>> > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
>> > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
>> > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
>> > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
>> > >> > need to modify.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Talk to you later,
>> > >> >
>> > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --****
>>
>> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>>
>> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>> > > o: 303.746.7302
>> > > Advancing the way the world uses the****
>>
>> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> > > *(tm)*****
>>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>>
>> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>> > o: 303.746.7302
>> > Advancing the way the world uses the****
>>
>> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> > *(tm)*****
>>
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*****
>>
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>>
>> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com****
>>
>> o: 303.746.7302****
>>
>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> *™*****
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Yeah, that is interesting.
My changes are only these:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=13a415fe8a3917a49dae5a1f3998f5ae78a61da3
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> Mike the commit message shows it is a merge “Merge remote-tracking
> branch 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward”****
>
> ** **
>
> Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread. ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
> *To:* Animesh Chaturvedi
> *Cc:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Brian Federle
>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0****
>
> ** **
>
> I don't understand how those got in there.****
>
> ** **
>
> I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.****
>
> ** **
>
> They are not related to my fix.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:****
>
> Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
>
> I see a few changes to
>
> Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
>
> Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
>
>
> Animesh****
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]****
>
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > OK, Animesh.
> >
> > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > >> >
> > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > >> >
> > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > >> >
> > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> > >> > need to modify.
> > >> >
> > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > >> >
> > >> > Talk to you later,
> > >> >
> > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --****
>
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the****
>
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*****
>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the****
>
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*****
>
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*****
>
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com****
>
> o: 303.746.7302****
>
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*****
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward"
Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread.
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Brian Federle
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
I don't understand how those got in there.
I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
They are not related to my fix.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
I see a few changes to
Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> OK, Animesh.
>
> My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>> wrote:
>
> > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>]
> >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >> >
> >> > Hi Animesh,
> >> >
> >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> >> >
> >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> >> >
> >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> >> > need to modify.
> >> >
> >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> >> >
> >> > Talk to you later,
> >> >
> >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
> o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302>
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *(tm)*
--
Mike Tutkowski
Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com<ma...@solidfire.com>
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
I don't understand how those got in there.
I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin.
They are not related to my fix.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
>
> I see a few changes to
>
> Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
> Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
>
> Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
>
>
> Animesh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > OK, Animesh.
> >
> > My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Animesh,
> > >> >
> > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> > >> >
> > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> > >> >
> > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> > >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> > >> > need to modify.
> > >> >
> > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> > >> >
> > >> > Talk to you later,
> > >> >
> > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac
I see a few changes to
Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js
Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js
Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me.
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> OK, Animesh.
>
> My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >> >
> >> > Hi Animesh,
> >> >
> >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> >> >
> >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix
> >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> >> >
> >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should
> >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been
> >> > written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would
> >> > need to modify.
> >> >
> >> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> >> >
> >> > Talk to you later,
> >> >
> >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *(tm)*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
OK, Animesh.
My changes are in 4.2-forward now.
Thanks!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
> No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>> >
>> > Hi Animesh,
>> >
>> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
>> >
>> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix allows
>> > the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
>> >
>> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should only
>> > impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been written
>> > to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would need to
>> > modify.
>> >
>> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
>> >
>> > Talk to you later,
>> >
>> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
No problem - I'll let you know when it's there.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > Hi Animesh,
> >
> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
> >
> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix allows
> > the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
> >
> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should only
> > impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been written
> > to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would need to
> > modify.
> >
> > I've written and tested the code, as well.
> >
> > Talk to you later,
> >
> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> Hi Animesh,
>
> It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
>
> The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix allows
> the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
>
> It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should only
> impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been written
> to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would need to
> modify.
>
> I've written and tested the code, as well.
>
> Talk to you later,
>
[Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Hi Animesh,
It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i).
The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix allows the
user to not have to use Mutual CHAP.
It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should only
impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has been written to
date that uses the logic in the VMware code that I would need to modify.
I've written and tested the code, as well.
Talk to you later,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/26/2013 10:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:wido@widodh.nl]
>>> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:24 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>>>
>>> -1 (binding)
>>>
>>> I am aware of Ceph bugs which are still open for 4.2, like migrating
>>> from primary to primary storage.
>>>
>>> I didn't get around fixing those yet since they were reported just last
>>> week.
>>>
>>> The issue: https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4423<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4423>
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
>>> [Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing fixes
>> from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO looking through
>> that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1.
>>
>>
> I also sent a cherry-pick request last week for a fix which is in
> 4.2-forward: 829dbaccb470431244f814a9d95fc7**823a3e0201
>
> It isn't in 4.2 yet. It fixes a different RBD issue.
>
> Wido
>
>
> On 08/23/2013 08:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>>> vote:
>>>>
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=**
>>>> shortlog;h=<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=>
>>>> refs/heads/4.2
>>>> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47f**e46aaafefa
>>>>
>>>> List of changes:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=**
>>>> blob_plain<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain>
>>>> ;
>>>> f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>>>>
>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>> location):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/>
>>>>
>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS>
>>>>
>>>> Testing instructions are here:
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/**
>>>> Release+test+pr<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr>
>>>> ocedure
>>>>
>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>>>
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:wido@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:58 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
>
>
> On 08/26/2013 10:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >
> >>>>
> >>> [Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing
> >> fixes from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO
> >> looking through that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I also sent a cherry-pick request last week for a fix which is in
> >> 4.2-forward: 829dbaccb470431244f814a9d95fc7823a3e0201
> >>
> >> It isn't in 4.2 yet. It fixes a different RBD issue.
> >>
> >> Wido
> >>
> > [Animesh>] Yes I saw that and I will pull it in for the new RC build
> > anyway. Do you have fix for CLOUDSTACK-4423? Did you check my comment
> > on it
> >
>
> I do not have a fix yet, but my hope is that it is already fixed since
> it seems to be a QCOW2 <> RAW conversion problem which under the hood
> uses the same code as downloading a volume.
>
> My plan was to check it tomorrow since I didn't have time yet to
> investigate.
>
> Wido
>
> >
[Animesh>] Ok I will create a new RC build with your other fix and keeps finger crossed that this is not an issue. If it is still an issue can you fix it for 4.2.1?
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
On 08/26/2013 10:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>>>>
>>> [Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing
>> fixes from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO looking
>> through that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1.
>>>
>>
>> I also sent a cherry-pick request last week for a fix which is in
>> 4.2-forward: 829dbaccb470431244f814a9d95fc7823a3e0201
>>
>> It isn't in 4.2 yet. It fixes a different RBD issue.
>>
>> Wido
>>
> [Animesh>] Yes I saw that and I will pull it in for the new RC build anyway. Do you have fix for CLOUDSTACK-4423? Did you check my comment on it
>
I do not have a fix yet, but my hope is that it is already fixed since
it seems to be a QCOW2 <> RAW conversion problem which under the hood
uses the same code as downloading a volume.
My plan was to check it tomorrow since I didn't have time yet to
investigate.
Wido
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> >>
> > [Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing
> fixes from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO looking
> through that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1.
> >
>
> I also sent a cherry-pick request last week for a fix which is in
> 4.2-forward: 829dbaccb470431244f814a9d95fc7823a3e0201
>
> It isn't in 4.2 yet. It fixes a different RBD issue.
>
> Wido
>
[Animesh>] Yes I saw that and I will pull it in for the new RC build anyway. Do you have fix for CLOUDSTACK-4423? Did you check my comment on it
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
On 08/26/2013 10:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:wido@widodh.nl]
>> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:24 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>> I am aware of Ceph bugs which are still open for 4.2, like migrating
>> from primary to primary storage.
>>
>> I didn't get around fixing those yet since they were reported just last
>> week.
>>
>> The issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4423
>>
>> Wido
>>
> [Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing fixes from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO looking through that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1.
>
I also sent a cherry-pick request last week for a fix which is in
4.2-forward: 829dbaccb470431244f814a9d95fc7823a3e0201
It isn't in 4.2 yet. It fixes a different RBD issue.
Wido
>> On 08/23/2013 08:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>> vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
>>> refs/heads/4.2
>>> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>>>
>>> List of changes:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
>>> f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Testing instructions are here:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr
>>> ocedure
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:wido@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:24 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> I am aware of Ceph bugs which are still open for 4.2, like migrating
> from primary to primary storage.
>
> I didn't get around fixing those yet since they were reported just last
> week.
>
> The issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4423
>
> Wido
>
[Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing fixes from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO looking through that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1.
> On 08/23/2013 08:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> > refs/heads/4.2
> > Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
> >
> > List of changes:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
> > f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Testing instructions are here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr
> > ocedure
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
-1 (binding)
I am aware of Ceph bugs which are still open for 4.2, like migrating
from primary to primary storage.
I didn't get around fixing those yet since they were reported just last
week.
The issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4423
Wido
On 08/23/2013 08:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:22 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> I have actually received some critical info from VMworld about how
> people what to use the SolidFire plug-in.
>
> It is a small, but important change.
>
> Can I put my fix in?
>
[Animesh>] What is the nature of change and risk of regression? Can it wait for 4.2.1? Do you have a tested fix available now?
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 9:38 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up
> > > > > for a
> > > > > vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=short
> > > > > log;
> > > > > h=refs/heads/4.2
> > > > > Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
> > > > >
> > > > > List of changes:
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_
> > > > > plai
> > > > > n;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
> > > > >
> > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
> > > > > same
> > > > > location):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
> > > > >
> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Testing instructions are here:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+t
> > > > > est+
> > > > > procedure
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
> > > > > to
> > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > The reason is my fault. I forgot that I committed to adding the
> > > > legal docs for this: http://markmail.org/message/rrxypu25fwyxjdae
> > > >
> > > > I am working on it now.
> > > >
> > > > -chip
> > >
> > > Resolved now in master / 4.2 / 4.2-forward
> > [Animesh>] I will create a new RC and start a new VOTE. If this is the
> > only change (mostly textual) does the VOTE has to be open for still 72
> > hours?
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *(tm)*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
I have actually received some critical info from VMworld about how people
what to use the SolidFire plug-in.
It is a small, but important change.
Can I put my fix in?
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 9:38 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > > > vote:
> > > >
> > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
> > > > h=refs/heads/4.2
> > > > Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
> > > >
> > > > List of changes:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai
> > > > n;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
> > > >
> > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > > location):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
> > > >
> > > > PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Testing instructions are here:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+
> > > > procedure
> > > >
> > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > -1 (binding)
> > >
> > > The reason is my fault. I forgot that I committed to adding the legal
> > > docs for this: http://markmail.org/message/rrxypu25fwyxjdae
> > >
> > > I am working on it now.
> > >
> > > -chip
> >
> > Resolved now in master / 4.2 / 4.2-forward
> [Animesh>] I will create a new RC and start a new VOTE. If this is the
> only change (mostly textual) does the VOTE has to be open for still 72
> hours?
>
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:05 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:13:34PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > [Animesh>] I will create a new RC and start a new VOTE. If this is the
> only change (mostly textual) does the VOTE has to be open for still 72
> hours?
>
> Yes.
>
> It's important to note that voting is a method of community engagement.
> The act of the release is the output of engaging as a community to
> jointly review the proposed release artifacts. 72 hours is *at least*,
> and (as noted earlier) really should be 3 working days.
>
> -chip
[Animesh>] Well I wanted to clarify for the type of change, I will pick up few other fixes anyway and start a new VOTE shortly
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:13:34PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> [Animesh>] I will create a new RC and start a new VOTE. If this is the only change (mostly textual) does the VOTE has to be open for still 72 hours?
Yes.
It's important to note that voting is a method of community
engagement. The act of the release is the output of engaging as a
community to jointly review the proposed release artifacts. 72 hours is
*at least*, and (as noted earlier) really should be 3 working days.
-chip
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 9:38 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > > vote:
> > >
> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
> > > h=refs/heads/4.2
> > > Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
> > >
> > > List of changes:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai
> > > n;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >
> > > Testing instructions are here:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+
> > > procedure
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -1 (binding)
> >
> > The reason is my fault. I forgot that I committed to adding the legal
> > docs for this: http://markmail.org/message/rrxypu25fwyxjdae
> >
> > I am working on it now.
> >
> > -chip
>
> Resolved now in master / 4.2 / 4.2-forward
[Animesh>] I will create a new RC and start a new VOTE. If this is the only change (mostly textual) does the VOTE has to be open for still 72 hours?
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> > Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
> >
> > List of changes:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Testing instructions are here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> The reason is my fault. I forgot that I committed to adding the legal
> docs for this: http://markmail.org/message/rrxypu25fwyxjdae
>
> I am working on it now.
>
> -chip
Resolved now in master / 4.2 / 4.2-forward
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
-1 (binding)
The reason is my fault. I forgot that I committed to adding the legal
docs for this: http://markmail.org/message/rrxypu25fwyxjdae
I am working on it now.
-chip
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>.
Ah, I am very sorry; I overlooked that part. I just happened reread the text and went right into the changes.
Thank you for your response. Appreciate it! :-)
On Aug 23, 2013, at 03:22 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> The changes section is empty for 4.2 as this will be covered in Release Notes as per community discussion. Release Notes are in progress but you can look at the JIRA filter https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323963 for features and improvements in 4.2
>
> Animesh
>
> From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.lawler@me.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:12 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me that there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
>
> - Maurice
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
The changes section is empty for 4.2 as this will be covered in Release Notes as per community discussion. Release Notes are in progress but you can look at the JIRA filter https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323963 for features and improvements in 4.2
Animesh
From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.lawler@me.com]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:12 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me that there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
- Maurice
On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Yes
________________________________________
From: Mike Tutkowski [mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:31 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Perfect ... Pacific time, I assume. :)
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> Will Tuesday noon work?
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:58 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I would really appreciate Monday and Tuesday to run regression
> tests
> > on this.
> >
> > My weekend is busy getting a CloudStack install up and running for
> > SolidFire people to use at the upcoming VMworld.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> IIRC, our bylaws don't state any problems with the 72-hour voting window
> >> being on a weekend.
> >>
> >> However, doesn't this window essentially leave one business day for
> people
> >> to test the RC?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *™*
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Perfect ... Pacific time, I assume. :)
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> Will Tuesday noon work?
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:58 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I would really appreciate Monday and Tuesday to run regression
> tests
> > on this.
> >
> > My weekend is busy getting a CloudStack install up and running for
> > SolidFire people to use at the upcoming VMworld.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> IIRC, our bylaws don't state any problems with the 72-hour voting window
> >> being on a weekend.
> >>
> >> However, doesn't this window essentially leave one business day for
> people
> >> to test the RC?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *™*
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Will Tuesday noon work?
Thanks
Animesh
On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:58 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mi...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I would really appreciate Monday and Tuesday to run regression tests
> on this.
>
> My weekend is busy getting a CloudStack install up and running for
> SolidFire people to use at the upcoming VMworld.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com> wrote:
>
>> IIRC, our bylaws don't state any problems with the 72-hour voting window
>> being on a weekend.
>>
>> However, doesn't this window essentially leave one business day for people
>> to test the RC?
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Joe Brockmeier <jz...@zonker.net>.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 10:57 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Yeah, I would really appreciate Monday and Tuesday to run regression
> tests on this.
+1 - In the future I think we should probably schedule votes like this
to allow 72 hours during "business hours" if at all possible. (Though
some people do have more time on the weekend for testing if CloudStack
isn't part of their $dayjob...)
(Note that it's not just 72 hours, though - we also need a "lazy
majority" of at least 3 PMC members.)
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
jzb@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Yeah, I would really appreciate Monday and Tuesday to run regression tests
on this.
My weekend is busy getting a CloudStack install up and running for
SolidFire people to use at the upcoming VMworld.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com> wrote:
> IIRC, our bylaws don't state any problems with the 72-hour voting window
> being on a weekend.
>
> However, doesn't this window essentially leave one business day for people
> to test the RC?
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Dave Cahill <dc...@midokura.com>.
IIRC, our bylaws don't state any problems with the 72-hour voting window
being on a weekend.
However, doesn't this window essentially leave one business day for people
to test the RC?
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
OK - thanks for the info...just trying to make sure I understand the
process pretty well.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com> wrote:
> It was good to have but never a blocker for release from prior releases.
> However if community can close critical/blockers atleast that would help
> greatly to have confidence in the fixed areas.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:53 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> Would we consider releasing if those resolved defects that were referred
> to in another e-mail have not been formally closed or is that a
> prerequisite for release?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Maurice Lawler <maurice.lawler@me.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thank you both for directing me to the correct link, greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Aug 23, 2013, at 03:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> > Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > You may be looking at the 4.1 section. The actual RN will contain the
> > complete list. In the meantime
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323963
> >
> > From: Maurice Lawler
> > <ma...@me.com>>
> > Reply-To:
> > "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> > Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:12 PM
> > To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> > Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> > dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
> >
> > I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me
> > that there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
> >
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
> > f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
> >
> > Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
> >
> > - Maurice
> >
> > On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> > refs/heads/4.2
> > Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
> >
> > List of changes:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
> > f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Testing instructions are here:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr
> > ocedure
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *(tm)*
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Sudha Ponnaganti <su...@citrix.com>.
It was good to have but never a blocker for release from prior releases.
However if community can close critical/blockers atleast that would help greatly to have confidence in the fixed areas.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:53 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Would we consider releasing if those resolved defects that were referred to in another e-mail have not been formally closed or is that a prerequisite for release?
Thanks
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>wrote:
> Thank you both for directing me to the correct link, greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 03:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> You may be looking at the 4.1 section. The actual RN will contain the
> complete list. In the meantime
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323963
>
> From: Maurice Lawler
> <ma...@me.com>>
> Reply-To:
> "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:12 PM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me
> that there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
> f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
>
> - Maurice
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
> f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr
> ocedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*(tm)*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
Would we consider releasing if those resolved defects that were referred to
in another e-mail have not been formally closed or is that a prerequisite
for release?
Thanks
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>wrote:
> Thank you both for directing me to the correct link, greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 03:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> You may be looking at the 4.1 section. The actual RN will contain the
> complete list. In the meantime
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323963
>
> From: Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>>
> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:12 PM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me that
> there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
>
> - Maurice
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com<ma...@citrix.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>.
Thank you both for directing me to the correct link, greatly appreciated.
On Aug 23, 2013, at 03:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
> You may be looking at the 4.1 section. The actual RN will contain the complete list. In the meantime
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323963
>
> From: Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>>
> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:12 PM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
>
> I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me that there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
>
> - Maurice
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
You may be looking at the 4.1 section. The actual RN will contain the complete list. In the meantime
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323963
From: Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:12 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me that there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
- Maurice
On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0
Posted by Maurice Lawler <ma...@me.com>.
I was reviewing the changes, I do not see what was previously told me that there would be multiple IP support in 4.2
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
Did that hit the cutting room floor for this pending release?
- Maurice
On Aug 23, 2013, at 02:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
> Commit: 06f28722b6fe5827d58861e9a9d47fe46aaafefa
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>