[lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.)

[Nathan Beyer <nb...@kc.rr.com>]

Here are some additional patches for the 'math' sub-package. The second
attachment is a new test file, since there wasn't a file just for testing
the Range class's base methods.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggregory@seagullsoftware.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 6:58 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.

As far as other areas, please look at the clover report [1] or generate
one yourself with Maven and feel free to up the %'s in any deficient
area.

Thanks,
Gary

[1] http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/commons-lang/2.2-dev/docs/clover

RE: [lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.)

[Nathan Beyer <nb...@kc.rr.com>]

Missed the other attachment.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:nbeyer@kc.rr.com] 
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 4:21 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: [lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better
coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.)

Here are some additional patches for the 'math' sub-package. The second
attachment is a new test file, since there wasn't a file just for testing
the Range class's base methods.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggregory@seagullsoftware.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 6:58 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.

As far as other areas, please look at the clover report [1] or generate
one yourself with Maven and feel free to up the %'s in any deficient
area.

Thanks,
Gary

[1] http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/commons-lang/2.2-dev/docs/clover