You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com> on 2015/03/26 12:46:52 UTC

答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation

+Table

发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.] [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
收件人: Hongsibao
主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation

+Table

2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:

> +Table
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Henry. :D
> >
> > +Relation
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> > wrote:
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +DataTable
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +Table
> > >> >
> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >> >
> > >> > +Table API
> > >> >
> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
> > >> > Relation.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> with
> > a
> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
> the
> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> 25.03.2015
> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
> > with
> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
> > appear.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> ---
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project,
> we
> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> PS
> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>  From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> vote
> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<ma...@n3.nabble.com>
To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., click here<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4>.
NAML<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>




--
View this message in context: http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation

Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
Nice, I see the rename is already merged!

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Cool, looking forward to use this great feature! :-)
> On Mar 29, 2015 12:26 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <al...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
> >
> > We have 15 votes:
> >   +Relation: 4
> >   +DataTable: 3
> >   +Table: 8
> >
> > So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> > pull request with the rename and Java support.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.]
> > [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> > > 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> > > 收件人: Hongsibao
> > > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >
> > > +Table
> > >
> > > 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> > >
> > >> +Table
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks Henry. :D
> > >> >
> > >> > +Relation
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > +Table
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> +DataTable
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> > >> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>>
> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > +Table
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> > >> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> > >> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> > >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > +Table API
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy
> > than
> > >> > >> > Relation.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > >> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by
> people
> > >> with
> > >> > a
> > >> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is
> > more
> > >> the
> > >> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> > >> 25.03.2015
> > >> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> > >> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> > vote
> > >> > with
> > >> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as
> they
> > >> > appear.
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> ---
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the
> > project,
> > >> we
> > >> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens
> > if I
> > >> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable
> and
> > >> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > >> > >> > >>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> > >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> > >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> > >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> PS
> > >> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> > >> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden
> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet
> > and
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>  From the previous discussion thread three names
> emerged:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a
> new
> > >> vote
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> > >> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> > >> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> > below:
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> > > To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List
> > archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<mailto:
> > ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com>
> > > To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.,
> > click here<
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4
> > >.
> > > NAML<
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> > > Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing
> > list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation

Posted by Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>.
Cool, looking forward to use this great feature! :-)
On Mar 29, 2015 12:26 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <al...@apache.org> wrote:

> I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
>
> We have 15 votes:
>   +Relation: 4
>   +DataTable: 3
>   +Table: 8
>
> So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> pull request with the rename and Java support.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> > +Table
> >
> > 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.]
> [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> > 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> > 收件人: Hongsibao
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >
> > +Table
> >
> > 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> >
> >> +Table
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks Henry. :D
> >> >
> >> > +Relation
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > +Table
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> +DataTable
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> >> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > +Table
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> >> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> >> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > +Table API
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy
> than
> >> > >> > Relation.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> >> with
> >> > a
> >> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is
> more
> >> the
> >> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> >> 25.03.2015
> >> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> >> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> vote
> >> > with
> >> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
> >> > appear.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> ---
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the
> project,
> >> we
> >> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens
> if I
> >> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> >> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> >> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> >> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> PS
> >> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> >> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet
> and
> >> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>  From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> >> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> >> vote
> >> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> >> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> >> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> > ________________________________
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> >
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> > To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List
> archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<mailto:
> ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com>
> > To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.,
> click here<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4
> >.
> > NAML<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing
> list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation

Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Great :)

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for driving the resolution, Aljoscha
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
> >
> > We have 15 votes:
> >   +Relation: 4
> >   +DataTable: 3
> >   +Table: 8
> >
> > So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> > pull request with the rename and Java support.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> >> +Table
> >>
> >> 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.]
> [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> >> 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> >> 收件人: Hongsibao
> >> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >>
> >> +Table
> >>
> >> 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
> >>
> >>> +Table
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Thanks Henry. :D
> >>> >
> >>> > +Relation
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > > +Table
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
> >>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> +DataTable
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
> >>> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>>
> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > +Table
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
> >>> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
> >>> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
> >>> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > +Table API
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy
> than
> >>> > >> > Relation.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >>> > >> > > +Table API / Table
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
> >>> with
> >>> > a
> >>> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is
> more
> >>> the
> >>> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
> >>> 25.03.2015
> >>> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
> >>> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >>> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
> vote
> >>> > with
> >>> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as
> they
> >>> > appear.
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
> >>> > >> > >>
> >>> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> ---
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the
> project,
> >>> we
> >>> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens
> if I
> >>> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
> >>> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >>> > >> > >>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
> >>> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> > >>>> +Relation
> >>> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
> >>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
> >>> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>> PS
> >>> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> >>> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet
> and
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>  From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a
> new
> >>> vote
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
> >>> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
> >>> > >> > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
> >>
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> >> To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List
> archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<mailto:
> ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com>
> >> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.,
> click here<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4
> >.
> >> NAML<
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing
> list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation

Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for driving the resolution, Aljoscha

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> wrote:
> I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!
>
> We have 15 votes:
>   +Relation: 4
>   +DataTable: 3
>   +Table: 8
>
> So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
> pull request with the rename and Java support.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com> wrote:
>> +Table
>>
>> 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.] [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
>> 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
>> 收件人: Hongsibao
>> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>>
>> +Table
>>
>> 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
>>
>>> +Table
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks Henry. :D
>>> >
>>> > +Relation
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > +Table
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
>>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> +DataTable
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
>>> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > +Table
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
>>> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
>>> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
>>> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > +Table API
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
>>> > >> > Relation.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>>> > >> > > +Table API / Table
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
>>> with
>>> > a
>>> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
>>> the
>>> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
>>> 25.03.2015
>>> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>>> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
>>> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>>> > with
>>> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
>>> > appear.
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
>>> > >> > >>
>>> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> ---
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project,
>>> we
>>> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
>>> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
>>> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
>>> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
>>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> > >>>> +Relation
>>> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
>>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
>>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>> PS
>>> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
>>> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
>>> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
>>> > >> > >>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>>> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>>  From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
>>> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>>> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>>> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
>>> vote
>>> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
>>> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
>>> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
>>> > >> > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > >>>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
>> To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<ma...@n3.nabble.com>
>> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., click here<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4>.
>> NAML<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation

Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
I hereby close the vote. Thanks for all your votes!

We have 15 votes:
  +Relation: 4
  +DataTable: 3
  +Table: 8

So I will rename ExpressionOperation to Table and finally merge the
pull request with the rename and Java support.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Matadorhong <ho...@huawei.com> wrote:
> +Table
>
> 发件人: aalexandrov [via Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive.] [mailto:ml-node+s1008284n4743h62@n3.nabble.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年3月26日 19:40
> 收件人: Hongsibao
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>
> +Table
>
> 2015-03-26 10:28 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=0>>:
>
>> +Table
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=1>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Henry. :D
>> >
>> > +Relation
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=2>>
>> > wrote:
>> > > +Table
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Márton Balassi <
>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=3>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +DataTable
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Markl, Volker, Prof. Dr. <
>> > >> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=4>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > +Table
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I also agree with that line of argument (think SQL ;-) )
>> > >> >
>> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> > >> > Von: Timo Walther [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=5>]
>> > >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 09:28
>> > >> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=6>
>> > >> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Name of Expression API Representation
>> > >> >
>> > >> > +Table API
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Same thoughts as Stephan. Table is more common in the economy than
>> > >> > Relation.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>> > >> > > +Table API / Table
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people
>> with
>> > a
>> > >> > > deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more
>> the
>> > >> > > pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice) Am
>> 25.03.2015
>> > >> > > 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=7>>:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>> > >> > >> The mail that started the thread says:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> "The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> > >> > >> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
>> > with
>> > >> > >> an alternative voting scheme will be done."
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they
>> > appear.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> 2015-03-25 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=8>>:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >>> +Table, DataTable
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> ---
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project,
>> we
>> > >> > >>> didn't vote for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I
>> > >> > >>> vote for Table and then there is a tie between DataTable and
>> > >> > >>> Relation? Will Table count for DataTable then?
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> – Ufuk
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> On 25 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> > >> > >>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=9>>
>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>>> +Relation
>> > >> > >>>> On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" <
>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=10>>
>> > >> > >>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>>> +Relation
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> PS
>> > >> > >>>>> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
>> > >> > >>>>> <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4743&i=11>>
>> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
>> > >> > >>>>>> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>>  From the previous discussion thread three names emerged:
>> > >> > >>>>>> Relation, Table and DataTable.
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>> > >> > >>>>>> The name with the most votes is chosen.
>> > >> > >>>>>> If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new
>> vote
>> > >> > >>>>>> with an alternative voting scheme will be done.
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> Please vote either of these:
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>>> +Relation
>> > >> > >>>>>> +Table
>> > >> > >>>>>> +DataTable
>> > >> > >>>>>>
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4743.html
> To start a new topic under Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., email ml-node+s1008284n1h60@n3.nabble.com<ma...@n3.nabble.com>
> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive., click here<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=aG9uZ3NpYmFvQGh1YXdlaS5jb218MXwxNDgwNTY1MzA4>.
> NAML<http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Name-of-Expression-API-Representation-tp4708p4744.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.