You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> on 2018/08/31 16:58:39 UTC
Retiring Airflow Gitter?
For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this seemed
like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if anyone
gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any time
on Gitter.
Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we had
users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously answered
questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
time.
The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache mailing
lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies join
Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value from
it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider just
deleting it.
Thoughts welcome.
-s
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>.
@anirudh @barni could you guys add whoever manages the k8s slack please?
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018, 2:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm not a fan of slack for open source work - it's a walled garden,
> signing up is a hurdle (where you have to use a work around of a heroku
> app), not to mention that the client is just so memory hungry!
>
> I'm just a curmudgeon who still likes IRC mainly. So long as I can install
> https://slack.com/apps/A7DL60U5D-irccloud/ <
> https://blog.irccloud.com/slack-integration/> I won't object ;)
>
> (I am not a fan of Gitter either, but I am constantly logged in via their
> IRC gateway. I'm usually the only PPMC responding in there, Bolke pops up
> from time-to-time too)
>
> -ash
>
> > On 1 Sep 2018, at 02:40, Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving Gitter to
> > Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other Apache
> > projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
> >
> > -s
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
> > <jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always activity.
> >>
> >> I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
> >> searchability but don't see the point of switching without that feature.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> >> seemed
> >>> like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if
> anyone
> >>> gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> >> time
> >>> on Gitter.
> >>>
> >>> Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> >>> found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we
> had
> >>> users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> >> answered
> >>> questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> >>> essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> >>> time.
> >>>
> >>> The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> mailing
> >>> lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies
> >> join
> >>> Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value
> from
> >>> it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider
> >> just
> >>> deleting it.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts welcome.
> >>> -s
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 on slack, especially if we can have multiple channels. There's something
really great about being able to ask questions in specialized mini
communities (i.e. #celery-executor or #kubernetes-executor). It also makes
it way easier for subject matter experts to respond to relevant questions.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 12:38 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> Right..
>
> Slack has awesome desktop & mobile clients. Creating an account on Slack is
> very lightweight, and I don't see that being a major hurdle IMHO, though
> Gitter accepts 3rd party auth (e.g. GitHub, etc....).
>
> It turns out that https://the-asf.slack.com/ already exists and has a
> channel called #airflow. If we do use this and if at some point the ASF
> decides to upgrade the workspace to a standard account, we would benefit.
> The negative is that the 10K message retention limit is on the entire
> workspace, not the channel.
>
> I'll submit an Apache-style VOTE on this matter and let the community
> decide.
>
> I do hope that whatever the community decides doesn't turn off engagement.
> -s
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 11:23 AM Scott Halgrim
> <sc...@zapier.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Data point of one here, but I prefer Slack to Gitter because I have Slack
> > open all day anyway. The only time I think to open Gitter is when I have
> a
> > question about Airflow
> > On Sep 1, 2018, 2:13 PM -0700, Shah Altaf <me...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > > Worth considering what the benefits vs problems are for Gitter vs
> Slack;
> > > i.e. what is Slack solving that Gitter fails at, and what will you lose
> > for
> > > this exchange.
> > >
> > > IMO there is a non-quantifiable benefit of the openness of Gitter
> rooms,
> > in
> > > that Gitter conversation snippets appear in search results, with an
> > '?at='
> > > querystring so you can jump straight to where the conversation
> occurred.
> > >
> > > So while Gitter's search is lacking, there is that, *added* benefit of
> > the
> > > free, persistent chat.
> > >
> > > And as mentioned earlier, Gitter works with your existing accounts.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:26 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > When we first entered the incubator ~2.5 years ago and we were
> > considering
> > > > Gitter (Slack was not an option back then), Jakob Homan (our mentor)
> > > > mentioned that the the ASF mailing lists were really the place where
> > things
> > > > needed to be documented. We killed our google group and GH issues and
> > moved
> > > > into the mailing lists and Jira. We tried Gitter to give people a
> > chance to
> > > > get instant answers, though as I mentioned at the top of this thread,
> > it
> > > > had a lot of issues.
> > > >
> > > > I'm glad to hear that the community is gaining some benefit from a
> > > > collaborative instant messaging solution, though it does appear from
> > this
> > > > thread that the community wants to move to Slack. As a 4-year user of
> > > > Slack, I agree Slack is a pretty awesome platform, but I've mostly
> used
> > > > paid versions at my employers. Once I get some guidance on how to set
> > it up
> > > > within Apache guidelines, if the ASF has any thoughts on the matter,
> > I'll
> > > > proceed to transition. Having 2 parallel solutions will be confusing
> > IMHO.
> > > > -s
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm not a fan of slack for open source work - it's a walled garden,
> > > > > signing up is a hurdle (where you have to use a work around of a
> > heroku
> > > > > app), not to mention that the client is just so memory hungry!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm just a curmudgeon who still likes IRC mainly. So long as I can
> > > > install
> > > > > https://slack.com/apps/A7DL60U5D-irccloud/ <
> > > > > https://blog.irccloud.com/slack-integration/> I won't object ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > (I am not a fan of Gitter either, but I am constantly logged in via
> > their
> > > > > IRC gateway. I'm usually the only PPMC responding in there, Bolke
> > pops up
> > > > > from time-to-time too)
> > > > >
> > > > > -ash
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 1 Sep 2018, at 02:40, Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving
> Gitter
> > to
> > > > > > Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other
> > Apache
> > > > > > projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -s
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
> > > > > > <jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always
> > activity.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
> > > > > > > searchability but don't see the point of switching without that
> > > > feature.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account.
> Though
> > this
> > > > > > > seemed
> > > > > > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the
> > community if
> > > > > anyone
> > > > > > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers
> > spend any
> > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > on Gitter.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it,
> > but
> > > > soon
> > > > > > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in
> > which we
> > > > > had
> > > > > > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making
> > previously
> > > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of
> > Gitter
> > > > > > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on
> > topic
> > > > at a
> > > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the
> > Apache
> > > > > mailing
> > > > > > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence,
> as
> > > > newbies
> > > > > > > join
> > > > > > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting
> > value
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> > > > consider
> > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > deleting it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > > > > > -s
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>.
Right..
Slack has awesome desktop & mobile clients. Creating an account on Slack is
very lightweight, and I don't see that being a major hurdle IMHO, though
Gitter accepts 3rd party auth (e.g. GitHub, etc....).
It turns out that https://the-asf.slack.com/ already exists and has a
channel called #airflow. If we do use this and if at some point the ASF
decides to upgrade the workspace to a standard account, we would benefit.
The negative is that the 10K message retention limit is on the entire
workspace, not the channel.
I'll submit an Apache-style VOTE on this matter and let the community
decide.
I do hope that whatever the community decides doesn't turn off engagement.
-s
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 11:23 AM Scott Halgrim
<sc...@zapier.com.invalid> wrote:
> Data point of one here, but I prefer Slack to Gitter because I have Slack
> open all day anyway. The only time I think to open Gitter is when I have a
> question about Airflow
> On Sep 1, 2018, 2:13 PM -0700, Shah Altaf <me...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > Worth considering what the benefits vs problems are for Gitter vs Slack;
> > i.e. what is Slack solving that Gitter fails at, and what will you lose
> for
> > this exchange.
> >
> > IMO there is a non-quantifiable benefit of the openness of Gitter rooms,
> in
> > that Gitter conversation snippets appear in search results, with an
> '?at='
> > querystring so you can jump straight to where the conversation occurred.
> >
> > So while Gitter's search is lacking, there is that, *added* benefit of
> the
> > free, persistent chat.
> >
> > And as mentioned earlier, Gitter works with your existing accounts.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:26 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > When we first entered the incubator ~2.5 years ago and we were
> considering
> > > Gitter (Slack was not an option back then), Jakob Homan (our mentor)
> > > mentioned that the the ASF mailing lists were really the place where
> things
> > > needed to be documented. We killed our google group and GH issues and
> moved
> > > into the mailing lists and Jira. We tried Gitter to give people a
> chance to
> > > get instant answers, though as I mentioned at the top of this thread,
> it
> > > had a lot of issues.
> > >
> > > I'm glad to hear that the community is gaining some benefit from a
> > > collaborative instant messaging solution, though it does appear from
> this
> > > thread that the community wants to move to Slack. As a 4-year user of
> > > Slack, I agree Slack is a pretty awesome platform, but I've mostly used
> > > paid versions at my employers. Once I get some guidance on how to set
> it up
> > > within Apache guidelines, if the ASF has any thoughts on the matter,
> I'll
> > > proceed to transition. Having 2 parallel solutions will be confusing
> IMHO.
> > > -s
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not a fan of slack for open source work - it's a walled garden,
> > > > signing up is a hurdle (where you have to use a work around of a
> heroku
> > > > app), not to mention that the client is just so memory hungry!
> > > >
> > > > I'm just a curmudgeon who still likes IRC mainly. So long as I can
> > > install
> > > > https://slack.com/apps/A7DL60U5D-irccloud/ <
> > > > https://blog.irccloud.com/slack-integration/> I won't object ;)
> > > >
> > > > (I am not a fan of Gitter either, but I am constantly logged in via
> their
> > > > IRC gateway. I'm usually the only PPMC responding in there, Bolke
> pops up
> > > > from time-to-time too)
> > > >
> > > > -ash
> > > >
> > > > > On 1 Sep 2018, at 02:40, Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving Gitter
> to
> > > > > Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other
> Apache
> > > > > projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
> > > > >
> > > > > -s
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
> > > > > <jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always
> activity.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
> > > > > > searchability but don't see the point of switching without that
> > > feature.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though
> this
> > > > > > seemed
> > > > > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the
> community if
> > > > anyone
> > > > > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers
> spend any
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > on Gitter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it,
> but
> > > soon
> > > > > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in
> which we
> > > > had
> > > > > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making
> previously
> > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of
> Gitter
> > > > > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on
> topic
> > > at a
> > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the
> Apache
> > > > mailing
> > > > > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> > > newbies
> > > > > > join
> > > > > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting
> value
> > > > from
> > > > > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> > > consider
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > deleting it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > > > > -s
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Scott Halgrim <sc...@zapier.com.INVALID>.
Data point of one here, but I prefer Slack to Gitter because I have Slack open all day anyway. The only time I think to open Gitter is when I have a question about Airflow
On Sep 1, 2018, 2:13 PM -0700, Shah Altaf <me...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> Worth considering what the benefits vs problems are for Gitter vs Slack;
> i.e. what is Slack solving that Gitter fails at, and what will you lose for
> this exchange.
>
> IMO there is a non-quantifiable benefit of the openness of Gitter rooms, in
> that Gitter conversation snippets appear in search results, with an '?at='
> querystring so you can jump straight to where the conversation occurred.
>
> So while Gitter's search is lacking, there is that, *added* benefit of the
> free, persistent chat.
>
> And as mentioned earlier, Gitter works with your existing accounts.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:26 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > When we first entered the incubator ~2.5 years ago and we were considering
> > Gitter (Slack was not an option back then), Jakob Homan (our mentor)
> > mentioned that the the ASF mailing lists were really the place where things
> > needed to be documented. We killed our google group and GH issues and moved
> > into the mailing lists and Jira. We tried Gitter to give people a chance to
> > get instant answers, though as I mentioned at the top of this thread, it
> > had a lot of issues.
> >
> > I'm glad to hear that the community is gaining some benefit from a
> > collaborative instant messaging solution, though it does appear from this
> > thread that the community wants to move to Slack. As a 4-year user of
> > Slack, I agree Slack is a pretty awesome platform, but I've mostly used
> > paid versions at my employers. Once I get some guidance on how to set it up
> > within Apache guidelines, if the ASF has any thoughts on the matter, I'll
> > proceed to transition. Having 2 parallel solutions will be confusing IMHO.
> > -s
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a fan of slack for open source work - it's a walled garden,
> > > signing up is a hurdle (where you have to use a work around of a heroku
> > > app), not to mention that the client is just so memory hungry!
> > >
> > > I'm just a curmudgeon who still likes IRC mainly. So long as I can
> > install
> > > https://slack.com/apps/A7DL60U5D-irccloud/ <
> > > https://blog.irccloud.com/slack-integration/> I won't object ;)
> > >
> > > (I am not a fan of Gitter either, but I am constantly logged in via their
> > > IRC gateway. I'm usually the only PPMC responding in there, Bolke pops up
> > > from time-to-time too)
> > >
> > > -ash
> > >
> > > > On 1 Sep 2018, at 02:40, Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving Gitter to
> > > > Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other Apache
> > > > projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
> > > >
> > > > -s
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
> > > > <jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always activity.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
> > > > > searchability but don't see the point of switching without that
> > feature.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> > > > > seemed
> > > > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if
> > > anyone
> > > > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> > > > > time
> > > > > > on Gitter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but
> > soon
> > > > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we
> > > had
> > > > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> > > > > answered
> > > > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > > > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic
> > at a
> > > > > > time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> > > mailing
> > > > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> > newbies
> > > > > join
> > > > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value
> > > from
> > > > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> > consider
> > > > > just
> > > > > > deleting it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > > > -s
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Shah Altaf <me...@gmail.com>.
Worth considering what the benefits vs problems are for Gitter vs Slack;
i.e. what is Slack solving that Gitter fails at, and what will you lose for
this exchange.
IMO there is a non-quantifiable benefit of the openness of Gitter rooms, in
that Gitter conversation snippets appear in search results, with an '?at='
querystring so you can jump straight to where the conversation occurred.
So while Gitter's search is lacking, there is that, *added* benefit of the
free, persistent chat.
And as mentioned earlier, Gitter works with your existing accounts.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:26 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> When we first entered the incubator ~2.5 years ago and we were considering
> Gitter (Slack was not an option back then), Jakob Homan (our mentor)
> mentioned that the the ASF mailing lists were really the place where things
> needed to be documented. We killed our google group and GH issues and moved
> into the mailing lists and Jira. We tried Gitter to give people a chance to
> get instant answers, though as I mentioned at the top of this thread, it
> had a lot of issues.
>
> I'm glad to hear that the community is gaining some benefit from a
> collaborative instant messaging solution, though it does appear from this
> thread that the community wants to move to Slack. As a 4-year user of
> Slack, I agree Slack is a pretty awesome platform, but I've mostly used
> paid versions at my employers. Once I get some guidance on how to set it up
> within Apache guidelines, if the ASF has any thoughts on the matter, I'll
> proceed to transition. Having 2 parallel solutions will be confusing IMHO.
> -s
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm not a fan of slack for open source work - it's a walled garden,
> > signing up is a hurdle (where you have to use a work around of a heroku
> > app), not to mention that the client is just so memory hungry!
> >
> > I'm just a curmudgeon who still likes IRC mainly. So long as I can
> install
> > https://slack.com/apps/A7DL60U5D-irccloud/ <
> > https://blog.irccloud.com/slack-integration/> I won't object ;)
> >
> > (I am not a fan of Gitter either, but I am constantly logged in via their
> > IRC gateway. I'm usually the only PPMC responding in there, Bolke pops up
> > from time-to-time too)
> >
> > -ash
> >
> > > On 1 Sep 2018, at 02:40, Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving Gitter to
> > > Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other Apache
> > > projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
> > >
> > > -s
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
> > > <jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always activity.
> > >>
> > >> I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
> > >> searchability but don't see the point of switching without that
> feature.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> > >> seemed
> > >>> like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if
> > anyone
> > >>> gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> > >> time
> > >>> on Gitter.
> > >>>
> > >>> Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but
> soon
> > >>> found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we
> > had
> > >>> users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> > >> answered
> > >>> questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > >>> essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic
> at a
> > >>> time.
> > >>>
> > >>> The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> > mailing
> > >>> lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> newbies
> > >> join
> > >>> Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value
> > from
> > >>> it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> consider
> > >> just
> > >>> deleting it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts welcome.
> > >>> -s
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>.
When we first entered the incubator ~2.5 years ago and we were considering
Gitter (Slack was not an option back then), Jakob Homan (our mentor)
mentioned that the the ASF mailing lists were really the place where things
needed to be documented. We killed our google group and GH issues and moved
into the mailing lists and Jira. We tried Gitter to give people a chance to
get instant answers, though as I mentioned at the top of this thread, it
had a lot of issues.
I'm glad to hear that the community is gaining some benefit from a
collaborative instant messaging solution, though it does appear from this
thread that the community wants to move to Slack. As a 4-year user of
Slack, I agree Slack is a pretty awesome platform, but I've mostly used
paid versions at my employers. Once I get some guidance on how to set it up
within Apache guidelines, if the ASF has any thoughts on the matter, I'll
proceed to transition. Having 2 parallel solutions will be confusing IMHO.
-s
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:30 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm not a fan of slack for open source work - it's a walled garden,
> signing up is a hurdle (where you have to use a work around of a heroku
> app), not to mention that the client is just so memory hungry!
>
> I'm just a curmudgeon who still likes IRC mainly. So long as I can install
> https://slack.com/apps/A7DL60U5D-irccloud/ <
> https://blog.irccloud.com/slack-integration/> I won't object ;)
>
> (I am not a fan of Gitter either, but I am constantly logged in via their
> IRC gateway. I'm usually the only PPMC responding in there, Bolke pops up
> from time-to-time too)
>
> -ash
>
> > On 1 Sep 2018, at 02:40, Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving Gitter to
> > Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other Apache
> > projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
> >
> > -s
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
> > <jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always activity.
> >>
> >> I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
> >> searchability but don't see the point of switching without that feature.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> >> seemed
> >>> like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if
> anyone
> >>> gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> >> time
> >>> on Gitter.
> >>>
> >>> Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> >>> found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we
> had
> >>> users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> >> answered
> >>> questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> >>> essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> >>> time.
> >>>
> >>> The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> mailing
> >>> lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies
> >> join
> >>> Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value
> from
> >>> it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider
> >> just
> >>> deleting it.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts welcome.
> >>> -s
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>.
I'm not a fan of slack for open source work - it's a walled garden, signing up is a hurdle (where you have to use a work around of a heroku app), not to mention that the client is just so memory hungry!
I'm just a curmudgeon who still likes IRC mainly. So long as I can install https://slack.com/apps/A7DL60U5D-irccloud/ <https://blog.irccloud.com/slack-integration/> I won't object ;)
(I am not a fan of Gitter either, but I am constantly logged in via their IRC gateway. I'm usually the only PPMC responding in there, Bolke pops up from time-to-time too)
-ash
> On 1 Sep 2018, at 02:40, Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving Gitter to
> Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other Apache
> projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
>
> -s
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
> <jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always activity.
>>
>> I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
>> searchability but don't see the point of switching without that feature.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
>> seemed
>>> like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if anyone
>>> gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
>> time
>>> on Gitter.
>>>
>>> Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
>>> found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we had
>>> users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
>> answered
>>> questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
>>> essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
>>> time.
>>>
>>> The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache mailing
>>> lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies
>> join
>>> Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value from
>>> it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider
>> just
>>> deleting it.
>>>
>>> Thoughts welcome.
>>> -s
>>>
>>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>.
Great feedback. There is an overwhelming interest in moving Gitter to
Slack. Just curious: for the folks who set up Slack for other Apache
projects, did you go via an Apache Infra ticket?
-s
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM James Meickle
<jm...@quantopian.com.invalid> wrote:
> I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always activity.
>
> I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
> searchability but don't see the point of switching without that feature.
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> seemed
> > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if anyone
> > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> time
> > on Gitter.
> >
> > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we had
> > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> answered
> > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> > time.
> >
> > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache mailing
> > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies
> join
> > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value from
> > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider
> just
> > deleting it.
> >
> > Thoughts welcome.
> > -s
> >
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by James Meickle <jm...@quantopian.com.INVALID>.
I am in the gitter chat most work days and there's always activity.
I would be fine with switching to permanent retention slack for
searchability but don't see the point of switching without that feature.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:59 Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this seemed
> like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if anyone
> gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any time
> on Gitter.
>
> Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we had
> users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously answered
> questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> time.
>
> The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache mailing
> lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies join
> Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value from
> it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider just
> deleting it.
>
> Thoughts welcome.
> -s
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Юли Волкова <xn...@gmail.com>.
About slack. Do you plan to use pay accounts? It does not have privileges
for opensource and it's very bounded in free plans (for example, it save
only 10 000 messages)https://test-slack-hook.slack.com/plans. I know some
communities move from slack to discord https://discordapp.com/ it more
friendly and less corporate-oriented than slack. Just to notice.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 9:28 PM Ben Gregory <be...@astronomer.io> wrote:
> +1 to Slack over Gitter
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:18 PM Daniel Imberman <
> daniel.imberman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm with Adam. Slack has been significantly more useful for the k8s
> > community. It's now the case that all k8s executor questions are being
> > fielded on kubernetes.slack.com. Would be great to have an airflow slack
> > instead.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:54 AM Trent Robbins <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm in favor of (yet another) slack. It will probably improve community
> > > growth and development, not just support searchable answers. I think
> > > nonprofits have an easy time getting permanent message retention for
> free
> > > but that would be an issue if that was not possible for Airflow. The
> > > default free account does not have permanent message retention (last I
> > > checked).
> > >
> > > Trent
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:32 Daniel Cohen <
> daniel.cohen@cloudinary.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > As a newcommer I find gitter lacking it's hard to follow or find
> > things.
> > > +1
> > > > slack
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 20:11 Adam Boscarino
> > > > <ab...@digitalocean.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits
> > it's
> > > > > usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more
> > out
> > > of
> > > > > the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the
> > > search
> > > > is
> > > > > so much better.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <
> > andrewhharmon@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of
> > Gitter. I
> > > > > find
> > > > > > there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a
> > > queation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though
> > this
> > > > > > seemed
> > > > > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community
> > if
> > > > > anyone
> > > > > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers
> spend
> > > any
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > on Gitter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it,
> but
> > > > soon
> > > > > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in
> which
> > > we
> > > > > had
> > > > > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making
> previously
> > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of
> > Gitter
> > > > > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on
> > topic
> > > > at a
> > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the
> Apache
> > > > > mailing
> > > > > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> > > > newbies
> > > > > > join
> > > > > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting
> > value
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> > > > consider
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > deleting it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > > > > -s
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Andrew Harmon
> > > > > > (202) 615-6433
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Adam Boscarino
> > > > > Senior Data Engineer
> > > > >
> > > > > aboscarino@digitalocean.com
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
> > > > > @digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > (Sent from cellphone)
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> [image: Astronomer Logo] <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>
> *Ben Gregory*
> Data Engineer
>
> Mobile: +1-615-483-3653 • Online: astronomer.io <
> https://www.astronomer.io/>
>
> Download our new ebook. <http://marketing.astronomer.io/guide/> From
> Volume
> to Value - A Guide to Data Engineering.
>
--
_________
С уважением, Юлия Волкова
Тел. : +7 (911) 116-71-82
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Pedro Machado <pe...@205datalab.com>.
+1 Slack. I've posted questions on gitter that were not answered. I suppose
part of the reason is things are hard to find there. I got much better
response here.
If there is a way to get permanent retention on Slack that would be ideal.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 1:28 PM Ben Gregory <be...@astronomer.io> wrote:
> +1 to Slack over Gitter
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:18 PM Daniel Imberman <
> daniel.imberman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm with Adam. Slack has been significantly more useful for the k8s
> > community. It's now the case that all k8s executor questions are being
> > fielded on kubernetes.slack.com. Would be great to have an airflow slack
> > instead.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:54 AM Trent Robbins <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm in favor of (yet another) slack. It will probably improve community
> > > growth and development, not just support searchable answers. I think
> > > nonprofits have an easy time getting permanent message retention for
> free
> > > but that would be an issue if that was not possible for Airflow. The
> > > default free account does not have permanent message retention (last I
> > > checked).
> > >
> > > Trent
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:32 Daniel Cohen <
> daniel.cohen@cloudinary.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > As a newcommer I find gitter lacking it's hard to follow or find
> > things.
> > > +1
> > > > slack
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 20:11 Adam Boscarino
> > > > <ab...@digitalocean.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits
> > it's
> > > > > usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more
> > out
> > > of
> > > > > the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the
> > > search
> > > > is
> > > > > so much better.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <
> > andrewhharmon@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of
> > Gitter. I
> > > > > find
> > > > > > there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a
> > > queation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though
> > this
> > > > > > seemed
> > > > > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community
> > if
> > > > > anyone
> > > > > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers
> spend
> > > any
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > on Gitter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it,
> but
> > > > soon
> > > > > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in
> which
> > > we
> > > > > had
> > > > > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making
> previously
> > > > > > answered
> > > > > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of
> > Gitter
> > > > > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on
> > topic
> > > > at a
> > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the
> Apache
> > > > > mailing
> > > > > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> > > > newbies
> > > > > > join
> > > > > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting
> > value
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> > > > consider
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > deleting it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > > > > -s
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Andrew Harmon
> > > > > > (202) 615-6433
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Adam Boscarino
> > > > > Senior Data Engineer
> > > > >
> > > > > aboscarino@digitalocean.com
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
> > > > > @digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > (Sent from cellphone)
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> [image: Astronomer Logo] <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>
> *Ben Gregory*
> Data Engineer
>
> Mobile: +1-615-483-3653 • Online: astronomer.io <
> https://www.astronomer.io/>
>
> Download our new ebook. <http://marketing.astronomer.io/guide/> From
> Volume
> to Value - A Guide to Data Engineering.
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Ben Gregory <be...@astronomer.io>.
+1 to Slack over Gitter
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:18 PM Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm with Adam. Slack has been significantly more useful for the k8s
> community. It's now the case that all k8s executor questions are being
> fielded on kubernetes.slack.com. Would be great to have an airflow slack
> instead.
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:54 AM Trent Robbins <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm in favor of (yet another) slack. It will probably improve community
> > growth and development, not just support searchable answers. I think
> > nonprofits have an easy time getting permanent message retention for free
> > but that would be an issue if that was not possible for Airflow. The
> > default free account does not have permanent message retention (last I
> > checked).
> >
> > Trent
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:32 Daniel Cohen <da...@cloudinary.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > As a newcommer I find gitter lacking it's hard to follow or find
> things.
> > +1
> > > slack
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 20:11 Adam Boscarino
> > > <ab...@digitalocean.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits
> it's
> > > > usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more
> out
> > of
> > > > the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the
> > search
> > > is
> > > > so much better.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <
> andrewhharmon@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of
> Gitter. I
> > > > find
> > > > > there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a
> > queation.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though
> this
> > > > > seemed
> > > > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community
> if
> > > > anyone
> > > > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend
> > any
> > > > > time
> > > > > > on Gitter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but
> > > soon
> > > > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which
> > we
> > > > had
> > > > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> > > > > answered
> > > > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of
> Gitter
> > > > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on
> topic
> > > at a
> > > > > > time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> > > > mailing
> > > > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> > > newbies
> > > > > join
> > > > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting
> value
> > > > from
> > > > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> > > consider
> > > > > just
> > > > > > deleting it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > > > -s
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Andrew Harmon
> > > > > (202) 615-6433
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Adam Boscarino
> > > > Senior Data Engineer
> > > >
> > > > aboscarino@digitalocean.com
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
> > > > @digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > (Sent from cellphone)
> >
>
--
[image: Astronomer Logo] <https://www.astronomer.io/>
*Ben Gregory*
Data Engineer
Mobile: +1-615-483-3653 • Online: astronomer.io <https://www.astronomer.io/>
Download our new ebook. <http://marketing.astronomer.io/guide/> From Volume
to Value - A Guide to Data Engineering.
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>.
I'm with Adam. Slack has been significantly more useful for the k8s
community. It's now the case that all k8s executor questions are being
fielded on kubernetes.slack.com. Would be great to have an airflow slack
instead.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:54 AM Trent Robbins <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in favor of (yet another) slack. It will probably improve community
> growth and development, not just support searchable answers. I think
> nonprofits have an easy time getting permanent message retention for free
> but that would be an issue if that was not possible for Airflow. The
> default free account does not have permanent message retention (last I
> checked).
>
> Trent
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:32 Daniel Cohen <da...@cloudinary.com>
> wrote:
>
> > As a newcommer I find gitter lacking it's hard to follow or find things.
> +1
> > slack
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 20:11 Adam Boscarino
> > <ab...@digitalocean.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits it's
> > > usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more out
> of
> > > the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the
> search
> > is
> > > so much better.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <andrewhharmon@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of Gitter. I
> > > find
> > > > there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a
> queation.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> > > > seemed
> > > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if
> > > anyone
> > > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend
> any
> > > > time
> > > > > on Gitter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but
> > soon
> > > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which
> we
> > > had
> > > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> > > > answered
> > > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic
> > at a
> > > > > time.
> > > > >
> > > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> > > mailing
> > > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> > newbies
> > > > join
> > > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value
> > > from
> > > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> > consider
> > > > just
> > > > > deleting it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > > -s
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Harmon
> > > > (202) 615-6433
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Adam Boscarino
> > > Senior Data Engineer
> > >
> > > aboscarino@digitalocean.com
> > > ------------------------------
> > > We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
> > > @digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
> > >
> >
> --
> (Sent from cellphone)
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Trent Robbins <ro...@gmail.com>.
I'm in favor of (yet another) slack. It will probably improve community
growth and development, not just support searchable answers. I think
nonprofits have an easy time getting permanent message retention for free
but that would be an issue if that was not possible for Airflow. The
default free account does not have permanent message retention (last I
checked).
Trent
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:32 Daniel Cohen <da...@cloudinary.com>
wrote:
> As a newcommer I find gitter lacking it's hard to follow or find things. +1
> slack
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 20:11 Adam Boscarino
> <ab...@digitalocean.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits it's
> > usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more out of
> > the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the search
> is
> > so much better.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <an...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of Gitter. I
> > find
> > > there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a queation.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> > > seemed
> > > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if
> > anyone
> > > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> > > time
> > > > on Gitter.
> > > >
> > > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but
> soon
> > > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we
> > had
> > > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> > > answered
> > > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic
> at a
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> > mailing
> > > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as
> newbies
> > > join
> > > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value
> > from
> > > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should
> consider
> > > just
> > > > deleting it.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > > -s
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Harmon
> > > (202) 615-6433
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adam Boscarino
> > Senior Data Engineer
> >
> > aboscarino@digitalocean.com
> > ------------------------------
> > We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
> > @digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
> >
>
--
(Sent from cellphone)
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Daniel Cohen <da...@cloudinary.com>.
As a newcommer I find gitter lacking it's hard to follow or find things. +1
slack
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 20:11 Adam Boscarino
<ab...@digitalocean.com.invalid> wrote:
> The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits it's
> usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more out of
> the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the search is
> so much better.
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of Gitter. I
> find
> > there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a queation.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> > seemed
> > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if
> anyone
> > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> > time
> > > on Gitter.
> > >
> > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we
> had
> > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> > answered
> > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> > > time.
> > >
> > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache
> mailing
> > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies
> > join
> > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value
> from
> > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider
> > just
> > > deleting it.
> > >
> > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > -s
> > >
> > --
> > Andrew Harmon
> > (202) 615-6433
> >
>
>
> --
> Adam Boscarino
> Senior Data Engineer
>
> aboscarino@digitalocean.com
> ------------------------------
> We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
> @digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Scott Halgrim <sc...@zapier.com.INVALID>.
I’ve used Airflow Gitter in the past, and received good answers to my questions, but haven’t in a while. I’d hang out more in an Airflow Slack community
On Aug 31, 2018, 10:11 AM -0700, Adam Boscarino <ab...@digitalocean.com.invalid>, wrote:
> The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits it's
> usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more out of
> the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the search is
> so much better.
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of Gitter. I find
> > there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a queation.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> > seemed
> > > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if anyone
> > > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> > time
> > > on Gitter.
> > >
> > > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> > > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we had
> > > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> > answered
> > > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> > > time.
> > >
> > > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache mailing
> > > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies
> > join
> > > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value from
> > > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider
> > just
> > > deleting it.
> > >
> > > Thoughts welcome.
> > > -s
> > >
> > --
> > Andrew Harmon
> > (202) 615-6433
> >
>
>
> --
> Adam Boscarino
> Senior Data Engineer
>
> aboscarino@digitalocean.com
> ------------------------------
> We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
> @digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Adam Boscarino <ab...@digitalocean.com.INVALID>.
The search functionality on Gitter is sorely lacking, which limits it's
usefulness for me. This will probably be unpopular, but I get more out of
the communities that use Slack (go, kubernetes, etc.) because the search is
so much better.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:05 PM Andrew Harmon <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of Gitter. I find
> there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a queation.
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this
> seemed
> > like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if anyone
> > gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any
> time
> > on Gitter.
> >
> > Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> > found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we had
> > users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously
> answered
> > questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> > essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> > time.
> >
> > The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache mailing
> > lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies
> join
> > Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value from
> > it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider
> just
> > deleting it.
> >
> > Thoughts welcome.
> > -s
> >
> --
> Andrew Harmon
> (202) 615-6433
>
--
Adam Boscarino
Senior Data Engineer
aboscarino@digitalocean.com
------------------------------
We're Hiring! <https://www.digitalocean.com/company/careers/> |
@digitalocean <https://twitter.com/digitalocean>
Re: Retiring Airflow Gitter?
Posted by Andrew Harmon <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm new to Airlfow and I personally get a lot of use out of Gitter. I find
there's almost always someone in there that can help answer a queation.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org> wrote:
> For a while now, we have had an Airflow Gitter account. Though this seemed
> like a good idea initially, I'd like to hear from the community if anyone
> gets value of out it. I don't believe any of the committers spend any time
> on Gitter.
>
> Early on, the initial committers tried to be available on it, but soon
> found it impossible to be available on all the timezones in which we had
> users. Furthermore, Gitter notoriously sucks at making previously answered
> questions discoverable. Also, the single-threaded nature of Gitter
> essentially makes it confusing to debug/discuss more than on topic at a
> time.
>
> The community seems to be humming along by relying on the Apache mailing
> lists, which don't suffer the downside listed above. Hence, as newbies join
> Apache Airflow, they likely hop onto Gitter. Are they getting value from
> it? If not, perhaps we are doing them a disservice and should consider just
> deleting it.
>
> Thoughts welcome.
> -s
>
--
Andrew Harmon
(202) 615-6433