Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files?

[Greg Marr <gr...@alum.wpi.edu>]

At 11:23 AM 3/18/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>I absolutely refuse to punish users who are using good OSes because 
>some OSes are brain-dead.  This is exactly the role that APR is 
>meant to fill
>
>Feel free to advocate Linux always returning APR_ENOTIMPL for 
>sendfile - I don't care.  However, blocking sendfile on non-buggy 
>OSes is not a solution that I am willing to sign off on.  -- justin

Isn't this about a change to not enable sendfile in the default HTTPd 
config, not a change to APR to disable sendfile?  In that case, this 
won't affect existing HTTPd users, because they already have it 
enabled in their config, and the default config never replaces an 
existing config.