You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Devdeep Singh <de...@citrix.com> on 2013/03/08 18:45:27 UTC
RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
I have started putting together the FS for this feature. The initial draft is shared here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Intel+TXT+Technology. Do let me know your comments/thoughts/concerns.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:55 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:32 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > This came in as I was following up on action item from IRC today.
> > > This
> > feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0
> > and processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in public
> > forms such as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow missed
> > getting filed. Can we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1.
> > I understand we are few days past cutoff, I will ensure we are more diligent
> in future.
> > >
> > > Animesh
> >
> > Just to close the loop on this. I'm not sure that this is even
> > progressing enough to make it in by out feature freeze date (if it is,
> > it's not visible to the rest of the community). Is the request to include it in
> 4.1.0 a moot point?
> >
> [Animesh>] Yes Chip we can move it out of 4.1 Devdeep is still wrapping up on
> some of his other tasks
Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:46:55AM -0800, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Wondering if anyone is interested to pick up QA for this story.
It's going to require some specialized hardware. It *might* be easier
for someone outside of Citrix to help test this if the hardware
requirements were shared. Folks will have to evaluate if they have it
available.
RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
Posted by Sudha Ponnaganti <su...@citrix.com>.
Wondering if anyone is interested to pick up QA for this story.
-----Original Message-----
From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.singh@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:45 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
I have started putting together the FS for this feature. The initial draft is shared here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Intel+TXT+Technology. Do let me know your comments/thoughts/concerns.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:55 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:32 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > This came in as I was following up on action item from IRC today.
> > > This
> > feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0
> > and processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in
> > public forms such as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow
> > missed getting filed. Can we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1.
> > I understand we are few days past cutoff, I will ensure we are more
> > diligent
> in future.
> > >
> > > Animesh
> >
> > Just to close the loop on this. I'm not sure that this is even
> > progressing enough to make it in by out feature freeze date (if it
> > is, it's not visible to the rest of the community). Is the request
> > to include it in
> 4.1.0 a moot point?
> >
> [Animesh>] Yes Chip we can move it out of 4.1 Devdeep is still
> wrapping up on some of his other tasks