You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ponymail.apache.org by sebb <se...@gmail.com> on 2017/09/03 09:25:20 UTC

Rename 'redundant' generator - misleading name

IMO the name 'redundant' for the generator is misleading.
It sounds like it is no longer used.

It should be renamed.

For example 'cluster'
Or 'invariant' as that is what it is trying to be.

Re: Rename 'redundant' generator - misleading name

Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.

On 09/03/2017 11:25 AM, sebb wrote:
> IMO the name 'redundant' for the generator is misleading.
> It sounds like it is no longer used.
> 
> It should be renamed.
> 
> For example 'cluster'
> Or 'invariant' as that is what it is trying to be.
> 

I have no strong attachment to the name. If you feel like a different
name is better suited, you are, from my point of view, more than welcome
to rename it.