auto white-list spam points?

[Matthew Lenz <ma...@nocturnal.org>]

X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham 
        version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Report:  *  0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Isn't being in the the auto white-list a good thing?

-Matt

Re: auto white-list spam points?

[Jørn-Morten Innselset <jo...@banetele.com>]

It's all somewhat explained here: 
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay

jm

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Lenz" <ma...@nocturnal.org>
To: "Spamassassin Users" <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 4:43 PM
Subject: auto white-list spam points?


> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham
>        version=3.0.3
> X-Spam-Report:  *  0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>
> Isn't being in the the auto white-list a good thing?
>
> -Matt
>
> 

Re: auto white-list spam points?

[jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>]

Auto whitelist works both directions. If it's seem spams from a source
before it gets a spammish score while sources that showed ham tend to
get hammish scores. See the wiki about it.
{^_^}
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Lenz" <ma...@nocturnal.org>


> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham 
>        version=3.0.3
> X-Spam-Report:  *  0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
> 
> Isn't being in the the auto white-list a good thing?
> 
> -Matt

Re: Sare URI ruleset

[jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>]

From: "guenther" <gu...@rudersport.de>

> Please do not hijack unrelated threads. If you are posting to the list
> with a new topic, do not Reply to a post but rather send a new one.
>
>
> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:04 -0600, Andrew Ott wrote:
>> Got this report this morning from all 3 of my spamassassin servers, all
>> running 3.0
>>
>> Is this ruleset no longer supported for 3.0?
>>
>> ===================
>> Lint output: warning: description for SARE_URI_GEOCIT_NUM is over 50 
>> chars
>> lint: 1 issues detected.  please rerun with debug enabled for more
>> information.
>> ====================
>
> It's a warning only. AFAIK this is no reason to be concerned.
>
> It just means, that the description is more than 50 chars long, and thus
> a verbose report in the header may exceed an 80 chars limit.
>
> FWIW, this is pretty common with some translations, like German.
>
> ...guenther

It is an annoying warning. There should be some way to turn it off.
(I cheated, found the places character count limits are tested and
made them much bigger. Poof - no warnings that I don't care about.
I'm not anal about the spam report formatting.)

{^_^} 

Re: Sare URI ruleset

[guenther <gu...@rudersport.de>]

Please do not hijack unrelated threads. If you are posting to the list
with a new topic, do not Reply to a post but rather send a new one.


On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:04 -0600, Andrew Ott wrote:
> Got this report this morning from all 3 of my spamassassin servers, all
> running 3.0
> 
> Is this ruleset no longer supported for 3.0?
> 
> ===================
> Lint output: warning: description for SARE_URI_GEOCIT_NUM is over 50 chars
> lint: 1 issues detected.  please rerun with debug enabled for more
> information.
> ====================

It's a warning only. AFAIK this is no reason to be concerned.

It just means, that the description is more than 50 chars long, and thus
a verbose report in the header may exceed an 80 chars limit.

FWIW, this is pretty common with some translations, like German.

...guenther


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Sare URI ruleset

[Andrew Ott <sa...@actcom.net>]

Got this report this morning from all 3 of my spamassassin servers, all
running 3.0

Is this ruleset no longer supported for 3.0?

===================
Lint output: warning: description for SARE_URI_GEOCIT_NUM is over 50 chars
lint: 1 issues detected.  please rerun with debug enabled for more
information.
====================

Thanx
Andrew